Coe Norma B, Konetzka R Tamara, Berkowitz Melissa, Blecker Emily, Van Houtven Courtney H
Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-4884, USA; email:
Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637-1447, USA; email:
Annu Rev Public Health. 2021 Apr 1;42:483-503. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-090419-102354. Epub 2021 Jan 4.
In this systematic review, we examine the literature from 2000 to 2020 to ascertain whether we can make strong conclusions about the relative benefit of adding informal care or formal care providers to the care mix among individuals receiving care in the home, specifically focusing on care recipient outcomes. We evaluate how informal care and formal care affect (or are associated with) health care use of care recipients, health care costs of care recipients, and health outcomes of care recipients. The literature to date suggests that informal care, either alone or in concert with formal care, delivers improvements in the health and well-being of older adults receiving care. The conclusions one can draw about the effects of formal care are less clear.
在本系统评价中,我们查阅了2000年至2020年的文献,以确定对于在家接受护理的个人而言,在护理组合中增加非正式护理提供者或正式护理提供者的相对益处,我们是否能够得出强有力的结论,特别关注护理接受者的结局。我们评估非正式护理和正式护理如何影响(或与)护理接受者的医疗保健使用、护理接受者的医疗保健成本以及护理接受者的健康结局。迄今为止的文献表明,单独的非正式护理或与正式护理相结合,都能改善接受护理的老年人的健康和福祉。关于正式护理的效果,人们能够得出的结论则不太明确。