Erickson R S, Yount S T
Oregon Health Sciences University, School of Nursing, Portland.
Nurs Res. 1991 Mar-Apr;40(2):90-3.
The purpose of this study was to compare tympanic and oral temperatures at four times during the perioperative period in 60 adults having major abdominal surgery. Tympanic temperature was measured with an infrared thermometer and oral temperature with a predictive thermistor thermometer. Measurements at the two sites were similar in pattern and moderately well correlated. Tympanic temperature was somewhat more sensitive to the effects of an intervention influencing body temperature. The tympanic-oral temperature offset was relatively stable over time, with tympanic readings having a smaller range of values at each measurement. Tympanic temperature measurement variation was fairly small, with 92% of readings reproducible within 0.5 degree F (0.3 degree C); comparable oral data were not available. The findings suggest that the tympanic site offers some advantage, but that either tympanic or oral readings would be satisfactory for routine intermittent monitoring of body temperature during the perioperative period.
本研究的目的是比较60例接受腹部大手术的成年人围手术期四个时间点的鼓膜温度和口腔温度。鼓膜温度用红外温度计测量,口腔温度用预测热敏电阻温度计测量。两个部位的测量模式相似,且相关性中等良好。鼓膜温度对影响体温的干预作用更为敏感。鼓膜-口腔温度差值随时间相对稳定,每次测量时鼓膜读数的取值范围较小。鼓膜温度测量的变异性相当小,92%的读数在0.5华氏度(0.3摄氏度)范围内可重复;未获得可比的口腔数据。研究结果表明,鼓膜测量部位具有一定优势,但鼓膜或口腔读数对于围手术期体温的常规间歇性监测都将是令人满意 的。