• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关于肺鼠疫的认知和反应。

Perceptions and reactions with regard to pneumonic plague.

机构信息

King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Department of Psychological Medicine, James Black Centre, 125 Coldharbour Lane, Camberwell, London SE5 9NU, UK.

出版信息

Emerg Infect Dis. 2010 Jan;16(1):120-2. doi: 10.3201/eid1601.081604.

DOI:10.3201/eid1601.081604
PMID:20031056
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2874346/
Abstract

We assessed perceptions and likely reactions of 1,005 UK adults to a hypothetical terrorist attack involving pneumonic plague. Likely compliance with official recommendations ranged from good (98% would take antimicrobial drugs) to poor (76% would visit a treatment center). Perceptions about plague were associated with these intentions.

摘要

我们评估了 1005 名英国成年人对涉及肺鼠疫的假设性恐怖袭击的看法和可能的反应。可能遵守官方建议的范围从好(98%会服用抗生素药物)到差(76%会去治疗中心)。对鼠疫的看法与这些意图有关。

相似文献

1
Perceptions and reactions with regard to pneumonic plague.关于肺鼠疫的认知和反应。
Emerg Infect Dis. 2010 Jan;16(1):120-2. doi: 10.3201/eid1601.081604.
2
The impact of communication materials on public responses to a radiological dispersal device (RDD) attack.宣传材料对公众应对放射性散布装置(RDD)袭击的反应的影响。
Biosecur Bioterror. 2013 Mar;11(1):49-58. doi: 10.1089/bsp.2012.0059. Epub 2013 Mar 19.
3
Use of Rapid Online Surveys to Assess People's Perceptions During Infectious Disease Outbreaks: A Cross-sectional Survey on COVID-19.利用快速在线调查评估传染病暴发期间人们的认知:一项关于新冠肺炎的横断面调查
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Apr 2;22(4):e18790. doi: 10.2196/18790.
4
Pneumonic plague.肺鼠疫
Semin Respir Infect. 2003 Sep;18(3):159-67.
5
Individual and community influences on adherence to directives in the event of a plague attack: survey results.个体和社区因素对传染病大流行时遵从指令的影响:调查结果。
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2012 Oct;6(3):253-62. doi: 10.1001/dmp.2012.43.
6
Epidemiological characteristics of an urban plague epidemic in Madagascar, August-November, 2017: an outbreak report.2017 年 8 月至 11 月马达加斯加城市鼠疫流行的流行病学特征:暴发报告。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2019 May;19(5):537-545. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(18)30730-8. Epub 2019 Mar 28.
7
What does the public want to know in the event of a terrorist attack using plague?如果发生利用鼠疫进行的恐怖袭击,公众想知道什么?
Biosecur Bioterror. 2004;2(3):208-15. doi: 10.1089/bsp.2004.2.208.
8
Yersinia pestis: still a plague in the 21st century.鼠疫耶尔森菌:21世纪的依然存在的一场“瘟疫”
Clin Lab Sci. 2004 Winter;17(1):25-9.
9
Bichat guidelines for the clinical management of plague and bioterrorism-related plague.比夏特鼠疫及生物恐怖主义相关鼠疫临床管理指南。
Euro Surveill. 2004 Dec 15;9(12):E5-6.
10
Plague.鼠疫
Respir Care Clin N Am. 2004 Mar;10(1):83-98. doi: 10.1016/S1078-5337(03)00051-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Challenges in Media Attention toward COVID-19-Preventive Behaviors: Dual Roles of Threat and Perceived Capability for Information Systems and Health Care.媒体对新冠肺炎预防行为关注的挑战:信息系统和医疗保健中威胁与感知能力的双重作用
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Apr 30;14(5):377. doi: 10.3390/bs14050377.
2
What Factors Influence Symptom Reporting and Access to Healthcare During an Emerging Infectious Disease Outbreak? A Rapid Review of the Evidence.哪些因素会影响传染病暴发期间的症状报告和获得医疗保健?对证据的快速审查。
Health Secur. 2021 Jul-Aug;19(4):353-363. doi: 10.1089/hs.2020.0126. Epub 2021 Jan 8.
3
Why disgust matters.厌恶为何重要。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2011 Dec 12;366(1583):3478-90. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2011.0165.
4
A plague on five of your houses--statistical re-assessment of three pneumonic plague outbreaks that occurred in Suffolk, England, between 1906 and 1918.降灾于你们五户人家——对1906年至1918年间发生在英国萨福克郡的三次肺鼠疫疫情的统计重新评估。
Theor Biol Med Model. 2010 Oct 25;7:39. doi: 10.1186/1742-4682-7-39.
5
Reassuring and managing patients with concerns about swine flu: qualitative interviews with callers to NHS Direct.对担心感染猪流感的患者进行安抚和管理:对 NHS Direct 来电者进行的定性访谈。
BMC Public Health. 2010 Aug 2;10:451. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-451.

本文引用的文献

1
Risk of person-to-person transmission of pneumonic plague.肺鼠疫人传人的风险。
Clin Infect Dis. 2005 Apr 15;40(8):1166-72. doi: 10.1086/428617. Epub 2005 Mar 16.
2
Bioterrorism: Preparing for the impossible or the improbable.生物恐怖主义:为不可能之事或不太可能之事做准备。
Crit Care Med. 2005 Jan;33(1 Suppl):S75-95. doi: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000151070.56915.22.
3
What does the public want to know in the event of a terrorist attack using plague?如果发生利用鼠疫进行的恐怖袭击,公众想知道什么?
Biosecur Bioterror. 2004;2(3):208-15. doi: 10.1089/bsp.2004.2.208.
4
Epidemiologic determinants for modeling pneumonic plague outbreaks.用于模拟肺鼠疫暴发的流行病学决定因素。
Emerg Infect Dis. 2004 Apr;10(4):608-14. doi: 10.3201/eid1004.030509.
5
Public health assessment of potential biological terrorism agents.潜在生物恐怖主义制剂的公共卫生评估
Emerg Infect Dis. 2002 Feb;8(2):225-30. doi: 10.3201/eid0802.010164.
6
Kaleidoscoping public understanding of science on hygiene, health and plague: a survey in the aftermath of a plague epidemic in India.万花筒般的公众对卫生、健康和瘟疫的科学认知:印度一场瘟疫疫情后的调查
Public Underst Sci. 1997 Jul;6(3):247-67. doi: 10.1088/0963-6625/6/3/004.
7
A plague on your city: observations from TOPOFF.降临你城市的一场瘟疫:来自“顶级官员计划”(TOPOFF)的观察
Clin Infect Dis. 2001 Feb 1;32(3):436-45. doi: 10.1086/318513. Epub 2001 Jan 29.