• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经国家心肺血液研究所资助的多中心 1985-1986 年经皮冠状动脉介入治疗和 1997-2006 年动态登记研究二十年演变及其对临床结果的影响。

Twenty-year evolution of percutaneous coronary intervention and its impact on clinical outcomes: a report from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute-sponsored, multicenter 1985-1986 PTCA and 1997-2006 Dynamic Registries.

机构信息

Cardiovascular Institute, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, and Department of Epidemiology, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pa, USA.

出版信息

Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Feb;2(1):6-13. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.108.825323. Epub 2008 Dec 15.

DOI:10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.108.825323
PMID:20031687
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3024012/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has undergone rapid progress, both in technology and adjunct therapy. However, documentation of long-term temporal trends in relation to contemporary practice is lacking.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We analyzed PCI use and outcomes in 8976 consecutive patients in the multicenter, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute-sponsored 1985-1986 percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) and 1997-2006 Dynamic Registries waves (wave 1: 1997-1998, bare-metal stents; wave 2: 1999, uniform use of stents; wave 3: 2001-2002, brachytherapy; waves 4 and 5: 2004-2006, drug-eluting stents). Patients undergoing PCI in the recent waves were older and more often reported comorbidities than those in the balloon era. PCI was more often performed for acute coronary syndromes and, in spite of the greater disease burden, was more often selective. Procedural success was achieved and maintained more often in the stent era. Significant reductions were observed in in-hospital rates (%) of myocardial infarction (PTCA Registry: 4.9; wave 1, 2.7; wave 2, 2.8; wave 3, 1.9; wave 4, 2.6; wave 5, 2; P(trend)<0.001) and emergency coronary artery bypass surgery (PTCA Registry: 3.7; wave 1, 0.4; wave 2, 0.4; wave 3, 0.3; wave 4, 0.4; wave 5, 0; P(trend)<0.001). Compared with the PTCA Registry, risk for repeat revascularization (31 to 365 days after index PCI) was significantly lower in the dynamic waves (adjusted hazard ratio: wave 1, 0.72; wave 2, 0.51; wave 3, 0.51; wave 4, 0.30; wave 5, 0.36; P<0.05 for all).

CONCLUSIONS

Percutaneous interventions, in the last 2 decades, have evolved to include more urgent, comorbid cases, despite achieving high success rates with significantly reduced need for repeat revascularization.

摘要

背景

经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)在技术和辅助治疗方面都取得了快速发展。然而,关于当代实践的长期时间趋势的文献记录却很少。

方法和结果

我们分析了多中心、美国国立心肺血液研究所(National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute)赞助的 1985-1986 经皮腔内冠状动脉血管成形术(PTCA)和 1997-2006 年动态注册研究中的 8976 例连续患者的 PCI 使用情况和结果(波 1:1997-1998 年,裸金属支架;波 2:1999 年,支架的统一使用;波 3:2001-2002 年,放射性治疗;波 4 和 5:2004-2006 年,药物洗脱支架)。与球囊时代相比,最近几轮 PCI 中的患者年龄更大,且更常报告合并症。对于急性冠状动脉综合征,进行 PCI 的比例更高,尽管疾病负担更大,但选择性也更高。支架时代的手术成功率更高且更稳定。院内心肌梗死发生率(PTCA 登记处:4.9%;波 1:2.7%;波 2:2.8%;波 3:1.9%;波 4:2.6%;波 5:2%;趋势 P<0.001)和紧急冠状动脉旁路移植术(PTCA 登记处:3.7%;波 1:0.4%;波 2:0.4%;波 3:0.3%;波 4:0.4%;波 5:0%;趋势 P<0.001)显著降低。与 PTCA 登记处相比,动态波的再次血运重建风险(指数 PCI 后 31 至 365 天)显著降低(校正后的危险比:波 1:0.72;波 2:0.51;波 3:0.51;波 4:0.30;波 5:0.36;P<0.05)。

结论

在过去的 20 年中,经皮介入治疗已经发展到包括更紧急、合并症更多的病例,尽管成功率很高,但需要再次血运重建的情况明显减少。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1a5/3024012/3bf2577ef3c8/nihms93120f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1a5/3024012/711278e5e54e/nihms93120f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1a5/3024012/6fc72450b412/nihms93120f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1a5/3024012/3bf2577ef3c8/nihms93120f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1a5/3024012/711278e5e54e/nihms93120f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1a5/3024012/6fc72450b412/nihms93120f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1a5/3024012/3bf2577ef3c8/nihms93120f3.jpg

相似文献

1
Twenty-year evolution of percutaneous coronary intervention and its impact on clinical outcomes: a report from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute-sponsored, multicenter 1985-1986 PTCA and 1997-2006 Dynamic Registries.经国家心肺血液研究所资助的多中心 1985-1986 年经皮冠状动脉介入治疗和 1997-2006 年动态登记研究二十年演变及其对临床结果的影响。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Feb;2(1):6-13. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.108.825323. Epub 2008 Dec 15.
2
Risk of death and myocardial infarction in patients with peripheral arterial disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (from the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute Dynamic Registry).外周动脉疾病患者行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的死亡和心肌梗死风险(来自美国国立心肺血液研究所动态注册研究)。
Am J Cardiol. 2011 Apr 1;107(7):959-64. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2010.11.019. Epub 2011 Jan 20.
3
The first generation of angioplasty.第一代血管成形术。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Feb;2(1):1-3. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.109.849950.
4
Percutaneous coronary intervention of moderate to severe calcified coronary lesions: insights from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Dynamic Registry.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中重度钙化冠状动脉病变:来自美国国立心肺血液研究所动态注册研究的新视角。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 Jan 1;77(1):22-8. doi: 10.1002/ccd.22613.
5
Impact of drug-eluting stents among insulin-treated diabetic patients: a report from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Dynamic Registry.药物洗脱支架在胰岛素治疗的糖尿病患者中的影响:来自美国国立心肺血液研究所动态注册研究的报告
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2008 Apr;1(2):139-47. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2008.02.005.
6
Temporal trends in patient-reported angina at 1 year after percutaneous coronary revascularization in the stent era: a report from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute-sponsored 1997-2006 dynamic registry.支架时代经皮冠状动脉血运重建术后1年患者报告的心绞痛的时间趋势:美国国立心肺血液研究所资助的1997 - 2006年动态注册研究报告
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2009 Nov;2(6):607-15. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.109.869131. Epub 2009 Oct 13.
7
Impact of sex on 3-year outcome after percutaneous coronary intervention using bare-metal and drug-eluting stents in previously untreated coronary artery disease: insights from the RESEARCH (Rapamycin-Eluting Stent Evaluated at Rotterdam Cardiology Hospital) and T-SEARCH (Taxus-Stent Evaluated at Rotterdam Cardiology Hospital) Registries.性别对既往未经治疗的冠状动脉疾病患者使用裸金属支架和药物洗脱支架进行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后3年预后的影响:来自RESEARCH(鹿特丹心脏病医院雷帕霉素洗脱支架评估)和T-SEARCH(鹿特丹心脏病医院紫杉醇支架评估)注册研究的见解
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Jul;2(7):603-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2009.03.016.
8
Outcomes of small coronary artery stenting with bare-metal stents versus drug-eluting stents: results from the NHLBI Dynamic Registry.裸金属支架与药物洗脱支架治疗小冠状动脉狭窄的结果:来自 NHLBI 动态注册研究的结果。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Feb;83(2):192-200. doi: 10.1002/ccd.23194. Epub 2013 Oct 24.
9
Contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention versus balloon angioplasty for multivessel coronary artery disease: a comparison of the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute Dynamic Registry and the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI) study.当代经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与球囊血管成形术治疗多支冠状动脉疾病的比较:美国国立心肺血液研究所动态注册研究与旁路血管成形术血运重建调查(BARI)研究的对比
Circulation. 2002 Sep 24;106(13):1627-33. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000031570.27023.79.
10
Drug-eluting stents and the use of percutaneous coronary intervention among patients with class I indications for coronary artery bypass surgery undergoing index revascularization: analysis from the NCDR (National Cardiovascular Data Registry).药物洗脱支架与接受首次血运重建的冠状动脉旁路移植术I类适应症患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的应用:来自国家心血管数据注册库(NCDR)的分析
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Jul;2(7):614-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2009.05.001.

引用本文的文献

1
Advances in drug-coated balloons for the treatment of coronary artery de novo large-vessel lesions.用于治疗冠状动脉初发大血管病变的药物涂层球囊的进展
J Int Med Res. 2025 Jun;53(6):3000605251342671. doi: 10.1177/03000605251342671. Epub 2025 Jun 28.
2
Application of Drug-Coated Balloons in Complex High Risk and Indicated Percutaneous Coronary Interventions.药物涂层球囊在复杂高危及特定经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的应用
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2025 Feb;105(2):494-516. doi: 10.1002/ccd.31316. Epub 2024 Dec 11.
3
Clinical and subclinical acute brain injury caused by invasive cardiovascular procedures.侵入性心血管操作引起的临床和亚临床急性脑损伤。
Nat Rev Cardiol. 2025 Apr;22(4):273-303. doi: 10.1038/s41569-024-01076-0. Epub 2024 Oct 11.
4
Current Landscape and Future Directions of Coronary Revascularization in Ischemic Systolic Heart Failure: A Review.缺血性收缩性心力衰竭中冠状动脉血运重建的现状与未来方向:综述
J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2023 Dec 4;2(6Part B):101197. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2023.101197. eCollection 2023 Nov-Dec.
5
Poking and Prodding So They Take Their Pills.戳戳点点,只为让他们吃药。
Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2024 Jun;38(3):395-396. doi: 10.1007/s10557-023-07487-4. Epub 2023 Jul 11.
6
Transcarotid versus transfemoral access for cerebrovascular intervention: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.经颈动脉与经股动脉入路行脑血管介入治疗的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Jun 14;13(6):e071820. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-071820.
7
Novel application of drug-coated balloons in coronary heart disease: A narrative review.药物涂层球囊在冠心病中的新应用:一项叙述性综述。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Mar 2;10:1055274. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1055274. eCollection 2023.
8
Complex Coronary Interventions: Are We Reaching a Plateau?复杂冠状动脉介入治疗:我们是否已达到平台期?
J Pers Med. 2022 Aug 8;12(8):1298. doi: 10.3390/jpm12081298.
9
Impact of multivessel versus single-vessel disease on the association between low diastolic blood pressure and mortality after acute myocardial infarction with revascularization.多支血管病变与单支血管病变对急性心肌梗死血运重建后舒张压降低与死亡率之间关联的影响。
Cardiol J. 2024;31(1):72-83. doi: 10.5603/CJ.a2022.0067. Epub 2022 Jul 12.
10
Radial Access for Coronary Angiography Carries Fewer Complications Compared with Femoral Access: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.与股动脉入路相比,桡动脉入路进行冠状动脉造影的并发症更少:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
J Clin Med. 2021 May 17;10(10):2163. doi: 10.3390/jcm10102163.

本文引用的文献

1
Catheter-based treatment of coronary artery disease: past, present, and future.基于导管的冠状动脉疾病治疗:过去、现在和未来。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2008 Aug;1(1):60-73. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.108.783134.
2
Completeness of revascularization for multivessel coronary artery disease and its effect on one-year outcome: a report from the NHLBI Dynamic Registry.多支冠状动脉疾病血运重建的完整性及其对一年结局的影响:美国国立心肺血液研究所动态注册研究报告
J Interv Cardiol. 2007 Oct;20(5):373-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8183.2007.00273.x.
3
Twenty-five-year trends in in-hospital and long-term outcome after percutaneous coronary intervention: a single-institution experience.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后住院及长期预后的25年趋势:单机构经验
Circulation. 2007 Jun 5;115(22):2835-41. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.632679. Epub 2007 May 28.
4
Outcomes and complications associated with off-label and untested use of drug-eluting stents.药物洗脱支架标签外使用和未经测试使用相关的结果及并发症。
JAMA. 2007 May 9;297(18):1992-2000. doi: 10.1001/jama.297.18.1992.
5
Prevention of premature discontinuation of dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with coronary artery stents: a science advisory from the American Heart Association, American College of Cardiology, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, American College of Surgeons, and American Dental Association, with representation from the American College of Physicians.冠状动脉支架置入患者双联抗血小板治疗过早停药的预防:美国心脏协会、美国心脏病学会、心血管造影和介入学会、美国外科医师学会及美国牙科协会联合发布的科学咨询意见,美国医师学会参与其中
J Am Dent Assoc. 2007 May;138(5):652-5. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2007.0237.
6
Thrombosis in coronary drug-eluting stents: report from the meeting of the Circulatory System Medical Devices Advisory Panel of the Food and Drug Administration Center for Devices and Radiologic Health, December 7-8, 2006.冠状动脉药物洗脱支架中的血栓形成:来自食品药品监督管理局器械与放射健康中心循环系统医疗器械咨询小组2006年12月7 - 8日会议的报告
Circulation. 2007 May 1;115(17):2352-7. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.688416.
7
Optimal medical therapy with or without PCI for stable coronary disease.稳定型冠心病接受或不接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的优化药物治疗
N Engl J Med. 2007 Apr 12;356(15):1503-16. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa070829. Epub 2007 Mar 26.
8
Mortality in randomized controlled trials comparing drug-eluting vs. bare metal stents in coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis.比较药物洗脱支架与裸金属支架治疗冠状动脉疾病的随机对照试验中的死亡率:一项荟萃分析。
Eur Heart J. 2006 Dec;27(23):2784-814. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehl282. Epub 2006 Oct 4.
9
Outcome of percutaneous coronary intervention in unstable angina pectoris versus stable angina pectoris in two different time periods.两个不同时间段内不稳定型心绞痛与稳定型心绞痛患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的结果
Am J Cardiol. 2006 Aug 15;98(4):447-52. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.03.021. Epub 2006 Jun 19.
10
Long-term (11-year) statin therapy following percutaneous coronary intervention improves clinical outcome and is not associated with increased malignancy.
Int J Cardiol. 2007 Jan 8;114(2):210-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2006.01.028. Epub 2006 Jun 23.