Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Texas, USA.
Am J Cardiol. 2011 Apr 1;107(7):959-64. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2010.11.019. Epub 2011 Jan 20.
Patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are at high risk for adverse cardiovascular events. Trends over time in outcomes with advances in PCI and medical therapy are unknown. We evaluated 866 patients with PAD in the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) Dynamic Registry undergoing PCI according to treatment eras: the early bare metal stent (BMS) era (wave 1, 1997 to 1998, n = 180), the BMS era (waves 2 and 3, 1999 and 2001 to 2002, n = 339), and the drug-eluting stent (DES) era (waves 4 and 5, 2004 and 2006, n = 347). We compared in-hospital and 1-year outcomes by recruitment era. In-hospital coronary artery bypass graft surgery rates were significantly lower in the later eras (3.9%, 0.9%, and 0.6% for the early BMS, BMS, and DES eras, respectively, p for trend = 0.005), and an increasing percentage of patients were discharged on aspirin, β blockers, statins, and thienopyridines (p for trend <0.001 for all comparisons). Cumulative 1-year event rates in patients with PAD in the early BMS era, BMS era, and DES era for death were 13.7%, 10.5%, and 9.8% (p for trend = 0.21), those for myocardial infarction (MI) were 9.8%, 8.8%, and 10.0% (p for trend = 0.95), and those for repeat revascularization were 26.8%, 21.0%, and 17.2% (p for trend = 0.008). The 1-year adjusted hazard ratios of adverse events in patients with PAD using the early BMS era as the reference were 0.84 for death in the BMS era (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.46 to 1.55, p = 0.58) and 1.35 in the DES era (95% CI 0.71 to 2.56, p = 0.36), 0.89 for MI in the BMS era (95% CI 0.48 to 1.66, p = 0.72) and 1.02 in the DES era (95% CI 0.55 to 1.87, p = 0.95), and 0.63 for repeat revascularization in the BMS era (95% CI 0.41 to 0.97, p = 0.04) and 0.46 in the DES era (95% CI 0.29 to 0.73, p = 0.001). In conclusion, despite significant improvements in medical therapy and a decrease in repeat revascularization over time, patients with PAD who undergo PCI have a persistent high rate of death and MI.
患有外周动脉疾病(PAD)并接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的患者发生不良心血管事件的风险很高。随着 PCI 和药物治疗的进步,其治疗效果的时间趋势尚不清楚。我们评估了美国国立心肺血液研究所(NHLBI)动态注册中心 866 例接受 PCI 的 PAD 患者的治疗时期:早期裸金属支架(BMS)时期(波 1,1997 年至 1998 年,n = 180)、BMS 时期(波 2 和 3,1999 年和 2001 年至 2002 年,n = 339)和药物洗脱支架(DES)时期(波 4 和 5,2004 年和 2006 年,n = 347)。我们比较了按招募时期的住院和 1 年结果。在后期治疗中,住院冠状动脉旁路移植术的比例显著降低(早期 BMS、BMS 和 DES 时期分别为 3.9%、0.9%和 0.6%,趋势 p 值=0.005),并且出院时使用阿司匹林、β受体阻滞剂、他汀类药物和噻吩吡啶类药物的患者比例呈上升趋势(所有比较的趋势 p 值均<0.001)。在早期 BMS 时期、BMS 时期和 DES 时期,PAD 患者的 1 年累积死亡率分别为 13.7%、10.5%和 9.8%(趋势 p 值=0.21),心肌梗死(MI)分别为 9.8%、8.8%和 10.0%(趋势 p 值=0.95),再次血运重建的分别为 26.8%、21.0%和 17.2%(趋势 p 值=0.008)。将早期 BMS 时期作为参考,PAD 患者的不良事件 1 年调整后的风险比为:BMS 时期的死亡率为 0.84(95%置信区间[CI]为 0.46 至 1.55,p = 0.58),DES 时期为 1.35(95%CI 为 0.71 至 2.56,p = 0.36);BMS 时期的 MI 为 0.89(95%CI 为 0.48 至 1.66,p = 0.72),DES 时期为 1.02(95%CI 为 0.55 至 1.87,p = 0.95);BMS 时期的再次血运重建为 0.63(95%CI 为 0.41 至 0.97,p = 0.04),DES 时期为 0.46(95%CI 为 0.29 至 0.73,p = 0.001)。总之,尽管随着时间的推移,药物治疗有了显著改善,再次血运重建的数量也有所减少,但接受 PCI 的 PAD 患者的死亡率和 MI 发生率仍然很高。