• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用依维莫司洗脱和紫杉醇洗脱冠状动脉支架植入术中边支闭塞的频率及临床后果。

Frequency and clinical consequences associated with sidebranch occlusion during stent implantation using zotarolimus-eluting and paclitaxel-eluting coronary stents.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Cardiology Division, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA 02215, USA.

出版信息

Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Apr;2(2):133-9. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.108.832048. Epub 2009 Apr 1.

DOI:10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.108.832048
PMID:20031706
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Myocardial infarction (MI) after drug-eluting stent placement has been associated with an unfavorable late prognosis. Although the etiology of periprocedural MI is multifactorial, sidebranch occlusion may be an important contributing factor. We sought to identify the incidence of sidebranch occlusion during zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES) and paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES) placement and to relate sidebranch occlusion to the occurrence of periprocedural MI.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Angiograms were reviewed from patients randomly assigned to treatment with a ZES (597 patients; 943 sidebranches) or a PES (619 patients; 977 sidebranches). Sidebranch occlusion was defined as Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction flow grade 0 or 1. Sidebranch occlusion was correlated with frequency of MI, as assessed by the creatine phosphokinase MB isoenzyme. Sidebranch occlusion occurred less often after the first stent deployment in patients treated with ZES (2.2%) than in patients treated with PES (4.0%; P=0.032). A similar reduction in the frequency of sidebranch occlusion at any point during the procedure was found in patients treated with ZES (2.9% versus 4.8% in PES patients; P=0.042). Multivariable predictors of sidebranch occlusion included baseline sidebranch stenosis, complex lesion morphology, smaller baseline minimal lumen diameters, and the use of a PES. Of the 20 patients with MI within 30 days of the procedure, 30% had evidence of sidebranch occlusion during the stent procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients treated with ZES were less likely to develop sidebranch occlusion during stent placement than patients treated with PES. Less frequent sidebranch occlusion with ZES may have contributed to the lower frequency rates of periprocedural MI in this study.

摘要

背景

药物洗脱支架置入后心肌梗死(MI)与预后不良相关。虽然围手术期 MI 的病因是多因素的,但侧支闭塞可能是一个重要的促成因素。我们旨在确定雷帕霉素洗脱支架(ZES)和紫杉醇洗脱支架(PES)置入过程中侧支闭塞的发生率,并将侧支闭塞与围手术期 MI 的发生联系起来。

方法和结果

对随机接受 ZES(597 例患者;943 个侧支)或 PES(619 例患者;977 个侧支)治疗的患者的血管造影进行了回顾。侧支闭塞定义为心肌梗死溶栓治疗血流分级 0 或 1。侧支闭塞与肌酸磷酸激酶 MB 同工酶评估的 MI 频率相关。与接受 PES 治疗的患者(4.0%;P=0.032)相比,接受 ZES 治疗的患者首次支架置入后侧支闭塞发生率较低(2.2%)。在接受 ZES 治疗的患者中,在手术过程中的任何时间点,侧支闭塞的频率也呈相似降低(ZES 患者为 2.9%,而 PES 患者为 4.8%;P=0.042)。侧支闭塞的多变量预测因素包括基线侧支狭窄、复杂病变形态、更小的基线最小管腔直径和 PES 的使用。在术后 30 天内发生 MI 的 20 例患者中,30%的患者在支架手术过程中存在侧支闭塞的证据。

结论

与接受 PES 治疗的患者相比,接受 ZES 治疗的患者在支架置入期间发生侧支闭塞的可能性较低。在这项研究中,ZES 导致的侧支闭塞发生率较低可能是围手术期 MI 发生率较低的原因之一。

相似文献

1
Frequency and clinical consequences associated with sidebranch occlusion during stent implantation using zotarolimus-eluting and paclitaxel-eluting coronary stents.使用依维莫司洗脱和紫杉醇洗脱冠状动脉支架植入术中边支闭塞的频率及临床后果。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Apr;2(2):133-9. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.108.832048. Epub 2009 Apr 1.
2
Late safety, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness of a zotarolimus-eluting stent compared with a paclitaxel-eluting stent in patients with de novo coronary lesions: 2-year follow-up from the ENDEAVOR IV trial (Randomized, Controlled Trial of the Medtronic Endeavor Drug [ABT-578] Eluting Coronary Stent System Versus the Taxus Paclitaxel-Eluting Coronary Stent System in De Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions).在新发冠状动脉病变患者中,与紫杉醇洗脱支架相比,依维莫司洗脱支架的安全性、疗效和成本效益:来自 ENDEAVOR IV 试验的 2 年随访结果(美敦力 Endeavor 药物[ABT-578]洗脱冠状动脉支架系统与紫杉醇洗脱 Taxus 冠状动脉支架系统在新发原生冠状动脉病变中的随机对照试验)。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Dec;2(12):1208-18. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2009.10.008.
3
Side branch occlusion with everolimus-eluting and paclitaxel-eluting stents: three-year results from the SPIRIT III randomised trial.使用依维莫司洗脱和紫杉醇洗脱支架治疗边支闭塞:SPIRIT III 随机试验的 3 年结果。
EuroIntervention. 2010 Dec;6 Suppl J:J44-52. doi: 10.4244/EIJV6SUPJA8.
4
Evaluation of the effects of everolimus-eluting and paclitaxel-eluting stents on target lesions with jailed side branches: 2-year results from the SPIRIT III randomized trial.评价药物洗脱支架和紫杉醇洗脱支架对伴有受困边支的靶病变的影响:SPIRIT III 随机试验的 2 年结果。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 Nov 1;76(5):644-51. doi: 10.1002/ccd.22606.
5
Improved late clinical safety with zotarolimus-eluting stents compared with paclitaxel-eluting stents in patients with de novo coronary lesions: 3-year follow-up from the ENDEAVOR IV (Randomized Comparison of Zotarolimus- and Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease) trial.与紫杉醇洗脱支架相比,在新发冠状动脉病变患者中,使用佐他莫司洗脱支架可改善晚期临床安全性:来自 ENDEAVOR IV (随机比较冠状动脉疾病患者中使用佐他莫司和紫杉醇洗脱支架)试验的 3 年随访结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 Oct;3(10):1043-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2010.07.008.
6
Zotarolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting stents in an all-comer population in China: the RESOLUTE China randomized controlled trial.中国所有患者人群中使用佐他莫司和紫杉醇洗脱支架的效果:RESOLUTE China 随机对照试验。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Jul;6(7):664-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.03.001. Epub 2013 Mar 21.
7
The "final" 5-year follow-up from the ENDEAVOR IV trial comparing a zotarolimus-eluting stent with a paclitaxel-eluting stent.ENDEAVOR IV 试验的“最终”5 年随访结果,比较了依维莫司洗脱支架与紫杉醇洗脱支架。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Apr;6(4):325-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2012.12.123. Epub 2013 Mar 20.
8
Intravascular ultrasound results from the ENDEAVOR IV trial: randomized comparison between zotarolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting stents in patients with coronary artery disease.ENDEAVOR IV试验的血管内超声结果:冠心病患者中佐他莫司洗脱支架与紫杉醇洗脱支架的随机对照比较
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Aug;2(8):779-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2009.05.015.
9
Differential long-term outcomes of zotarolimus-eluting stents compared with sirolimus-eluting and paclitaxel-eluting stents in diabetic and nondiabetic patients: two-year subgroup analysis of the ZEST randomized trial.在糖尿病和非糖尿病患者中,与西罗莫司洗脱和紫杉醇洗脱支架相比,依维莫司洗脱支架的长期差异预后:ZEST 随机试验的两年亚组分析。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Jun 1;81(7):1106-14. doi: 10.1002/ccd.24603. Epub 2013 Feb 9.
10
Clinical and angiographic outcomes of drug-eluting stents in patients with large vessel and single coronary artery lesion.大血管病变和单支冠状动脉病变患者药物洗脱支架的临床和血管造影结果。
Clin Cardiol. 2010 Jun;33(6):340-4. doi: 10.1002/clc.20744.

引用本文的文献

1
Drug-Eluting Stent Use in Percutaneous Coronary Interventions-A Narrative Review.药物洗脱支架在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的应用——一篇叙述性综述
J Clin Med. 2025 Jul 1;14(13):4643. doi: 10.3390/jcm14134643.
2
Final kissing balloon dilatation in patients with coronary bifurcation lesions treated with an upfront provisional stenting strategy.采用初始临时支架置入策略治疗的冠状动脉分叉病变患者的最终亲吻球囊扩张术
EuroIntervention. 2025 Mar 17;21(6):e318-e328. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00471.
3
Comparison of Contemporary Drug-eluting Coronary Stents - Is Any Stent Better than the Others?
当代药物洗脱冠状动脉支架的比较——是否有某种支架比其他支架更好?
Heart Int. 2020 Jun 18;14(1):34-42. doi: 10.17925/HI.2020.14.1.34. eCollection 2020.
4
Inadvertent Septal Ablation During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗期间的意外间隔消融
Cureus. 2021 Nov 3;13(11):e19227. doi: 10.7759/cureus.19227. eCollection 2021 Nov.
5
Inflammation during Percutaneous Coronary Intervention-Prognostic Value, Mechanisms and Therapeutic Targets.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗期间的炎症:预后价值、机制和治疗靶点。
Cells. 2021 Jun 4;10(6):1391. doi: 10.3390/cells10061391.
6
Carina Bifurcation Angle and Side Branch Occlusion in Coronary Bifurcation Lesions Intervention: Angiographic Lesions Characteristic Role in Determining Its Relation.冠状动脉分叉病变介入治疗中的嵴分叉角度和边支闭塞:血管造影病变特征在确定其关系中的作用
Int J Angiol. 2019 Jun;28(2):137-141. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1676042. Epub 2018 Nov 29.
7
The Role of Bioresorbable Scaffolds in Meeting the Challenges of Bifurcations.生物可吸收支架在应对分叉病变挑战中的作用
Interv Cardiol. 2013 Aug;8(2):87-89. doi: 10.15420/icr.2013.8.2.87.
8
Clinical outcomes of different first- and second-generation drug-eluting stents in routine clinical practice: results from the prospective multicenter German DES.DE registry.常规临床实践中不同代药物洗脱支架的临床结局:前瞻性多中心德国 DES.DE 注册研究结果。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2013 May;102(5):371-81. doi: 10.1007/s00392-013-0546-5. Epub 2013 Feb 6.
9
Second- and third-generation drug-eluting coronary stents: progress and safety.第二代和第三代药物洗脱冠状动脉支架:进展与安全性
Herz. 2011 May;36(3):190-6. doi: 10.1007/s00059-011-3458-z.
10
Automated surveillance to detect postprocedure safety signals of approved cardiovascular devices.自动化监测以发现已批准心血管器械的术后安全性信号。
JAMA. 2010 Nov 10;304(18):2019-27. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.1633.