• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

药物洗脱支架在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的应用——一篇叙述性综述

Drug-Eluting Stent Use in Percutaneous Coronary Interventions-A Narrative Review.

作者信息

Arh Rok, Balevski Igor, Granda Samo, Bevc Sebastjan

机构信息

Clinical Department of Cardiology, Clinic for Internal Medicine, University Clinical Centre Maribor, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia.

Department of Nephrology, Clinic for Internal Medicine, University Clinical Centre Maribor, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2025 Jul 1;14(13):4643. doi: 10.3390/jcm14134643.

DOI:10.3390/jcm14134643
PMID:40649017
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12250108/
Abstract

Coronary artery disease is the most common cause of mortality worldwide. Percutaneous coronary intervention represents an important method of treatment. Over time, the methods have been refined to improve safety and efficacy. With the development of drug-eluting stents, in-stent restenosis has importantly decreased, but it remains a relevant concern in terms of the need for additional revascularization procedures or recurrent coronary events. Different platforms, polymers, and anti-proliferative agents have been tested, mostly demonstrating non-inferiority when compared. Additional devices, such as drug-coated balloons, bioresorbable scaffold systems, gene-eluting stents and bioadaptor implants have been developed. As none of the aforementioned methods demonstrated considerable superiority over the others, the search for the ideal treatment method continues. Based on currently available data, the ideal treatment method could be a personalized approach combining different revascularization methods. Additional research with subpopulation group studies, different associated diseases or vessels affected, and longer follow-up are required to determine better subgroups of patients that would benefit most from specific treatment methods.

摘要

冠状动脉疾病是全球最常见的死亡原因。经皮冠状动脉介入治疗是一种重要的治疗方法。随着时间的推移,这些方法不断完善以提高安全性和疗效。随着药物洗脱支架的发展,支架内再狭窄已显著减少,但就需要额外的血运重建程序或复发性冠状动脉事件而言,它仍然是一个相关问题。不同的平台、聚合物和抗增殖剂已经过测试,大多数在比较时显示出非劣效性。还开发了其他装置,如药物涂层球囊、生物可吸收支架系统、基因洗脱支架和生物适配器植入物。由于上述方法均未显示出比其他方法有相当大的优越性,因此对理想治疗方法的探索仍在继续。根据目前可得的数据,理想的治疗方法可能是一种结合不同血运重建方法的个性化方法。需要进行更多针对亚人群组研究、不同相关疾病或受累血管以及更长随访时间的研究,以确定能从特定治疗方法中获益最大的更好的患者亚组。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a06/12250108/5ce025e3a56e/jcm-14-04643-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a06/12250108/5ce025e3a56e/jcm-14-04643-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a06/12250108/5ce025e3a56e/jcm-14-04643-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Drug-Eluting Stent Use in Percutaneous Coronary Interventions-A Narrative Review.药物洗脱支架在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的应用——一篇叙述性综述
J Clin Med. 2025 Jul 1;14(13):4643. doi: 10.3390/jcm14134643.
2
Management of urinary stones by experts in stone disease (ESD 2025).结石病专家对尿路结石的管理(2025年结石病专家共识)
Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2025 Jun 30;97(2):14085. doi: 10.4081/aiua.2025.14085.
3
Coronary artery stents: a rapid systematic review and economic evaluation.冠状动脉支架:一项快速系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2004 Sep;8(35):iii-iv, 1-242. doi: 10.3310/hta8350.
4
The Black Book of Psychotropic Dosing and Monitoring.《精神药物剂量与监测黑皮书》
Psychopharmacol Bull. 2024 Jul 8;54(3):8-59.
5
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.
6
Drug-eluting stents: a systematic review and economic evaluation.药物洗脱支架:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2007 Nov;11(46):iii, xi-221. doi: 10.3310/hta11460.
7
Treatment strategies for coronary in-stent restenosis: systematic review and hierarchical Bayesian network meta-analysis of 24 randomised trials and 4880 patients.冠状动脉支架内再狭窄的治疗策略:对24项随机试验和4880例患者的系统评价与分层贝叶斯网络荟萃分析
BMJ. 2015 Nov 4;351:h5392. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h5392.
8
Drug-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents for acute coronary syndrome.药物洗脱支架与裸金属支架治疗急性冠状动脉综合征的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Aug 23;8(8):CD012481. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012481.pub2.
9
Percutaneous coronary interventional strategies for treatment of in-stent restenosis: a network meta-analysis.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗策略治疗支架内再狭窄:网状荟萃分析。
Lancet. 2015 Aug 15;386(9994):655-64. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60657-2.
10
Next-generation drug-eluting stents in coronary artery disease: focus on everolimus-eluting stent (Xience V).冠状动脉疾病中的新一代药物洗脱支架:聚焦依维莫司洗脱支架(Xience V)。
Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2008;4(1):31-8. doi: 10.2147/vhrm.2008.04.01.31.

本文引用的文献

1
Randomized comparison of the combined Sirolimus eluting and endothelial progenitor cell combo Stent vs. biolimus eluting absorbable polymer coated biomatrix alpha stent in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: Rationale and study design of the Scandinavian Organization for randomized trials with clinical outcome (SORT OUT) XI trial.西罗莫司洗脱与内皮祖细胞联合支架对比生物雷帕霉素洗脱可吸收聚合物涂层生物基质α支架用于经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者的随机对照研究:斯堪的纳维亚临床结局随机试验组织(SORT OUT)XI试验的原理与研究设计
Am Heart J. 2025 May;283:37-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2025.01.012. Epub 2025 Jan 25.
2
A Randomized Comparison of Bioheart Sirolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Scaffold and Everolimus-Eluting Stents: The BIOHEART-II Trial.生物心脏西罗莫司洗脱生物可吸收支架与依维莫司洗脱支架的随机对照研究:BIOHEART-II试验
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2025 Jan 13;18(1):15-27. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2024.09.043.
3
Long-term outcomes following ultrathin vs thin-strut drug-eluting stents for percutaneous coronary intervention: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中超薄与薄支撑药物洗脱支架的长期疗效:随机对照试验的最新系统评价和荟萃分析
Am J Cardiovasc Dis. 2024 Oct 15;14(5):267-280. doi: 10.62347/UCLC9729. eCollection 2024.
4
Bioadaptor implant versus contemporary drug-eluting stent in percutaneous coronary interventions in Sweden (INFINITY-SWEDEHEART): a single-blind, non-inferiority, registry-based, randomised controlled trial.生物适应器植入物与当代药物洗脱支架在瑞典经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的比较(INFINITY-SWEDEHEART):一项基于登记、单盲、非劣效、随机对照试验。
Lancet. 2024 Nov 2;404(10464):1750-1759. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)02227-X. Epub 2024 Oct 28.
5
2024 ESC Guidelines for the management of chronic coronary syndromes.2024年欧洲心脏病学会慢性冠状动脉综合征管理指南
Eur Heart J. 2024 Sep 29;45(36):3415-3537. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehae177.
6
Benefits and Challenges of Drug-Coated Balloons in Peripheral Artery Disease: From Molecular Mechanisms to Clinical Practice.药物涂层球囊在周围动脉疾病中的应用:从分子机制到临床实践。
Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Aug 11;25(16):8749. doi: 10.3390/ijms25168749.
7
Clinical Updates in Coronary Artery Disease: A Comprehensive Review.冠状动脉疾病的临床进展:全面综述
J Clin Med. 2024 Aug 6;13(16):4600. doi: 10.3390/jcm13164600.
8
Systematic Review on Role of Drug Eluting Stent (DES) Versus Drug-Coated Balloon (DCB) in Small Vessel Coronary Artery Disease.系统评价:药物洗脱支架(DES)与药物涂层球囊(DCB)在小血管冠状动脉疾病中的作用
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2024 Jul;26(7):681-688. doi: 10.1007/s11886-024-02077-8. Epub 2024 Jun 8.
9
Long-Term Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Outcomes in Chronic Versus Acute Coronary Syndromes (TARGET All Comers Trial).慢性与急性冠状动脉综合征患者长期经皮冠状动脉介入治疗结局比较(TARGET 所有患者试验)。
Am J Cardiol. 2024 Apr 15;217:94-101. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2023.12.002. Epub 2024 Feb 11.
10
Efficacy and safety of drug-coated balloon for de novo lesions of large coronary arteries: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.药物涂层球囊治疗大冠状动脉初发病变的疗效与安全性:随机对照试验的系统评价与Meta分析
Heliyon. 2024 Jan 30;10(3):e25264. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25264. eCollection 2024 Feb 15.