Arnold Suzanne V, Morrow David A, Wang Kaijun, Lei Yang, Mahoney Elizabeth M, Scirica Benjamin M, Braunwald Eugene, Cohen David J
Saint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute, Kansas City, MO 64111, USA.
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2008 Nov;1(2):107-15. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.108.798009. Epub 2008 Nov 5.
Ranolazine has been shown to reduce myocardial ischemia and symptom severity among selected patients with chronic angina. However, data regarding the effect of ranolazine on health status/quality of life (QOL) are limited.
We performed a prospective QOL analysis alongside the Metabolic Efficiency with Ranolazine for Less Ischemia in Non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes (MERLIN)-TIMI 36 trial, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of ranolazine in 6560 patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes. Health status/QOL was evaluated at baseline and 4, 8, and 12 months after index hospitalization using the Seattle Angina Questionnaire, Rose dyspnea scale, SF-12, and EuroQol-5D. Health status/QOL scores improved significantly at all follow-up time points for both treatment arms. In the overall population, randomization to ranolazine was associated with minimal 12-month improvements in angina frequency and Seattle Angina Questionnaire-QOL (P<0.05). In subsequent exploratory analyses, there was a significant interaction between the benefits of ranolazine and anginal status before the index event. Among patients with prior angina (n=3565), treatment with ranolazine was associated with modest benefits across the full range of QOL domains, with the greatest benefits observed in angina frequency (mean effect=3.4; P<0.001) and Seattle Angina Questionnaire-QOL (mean effect=2.7; P<0.001). There were no significant benefits among patients without prior angina, however.
Among a broad population of patients with unstable coronary disease, ranolazine had a minimal effect on disease-specific health status and QOL over approximately 12 months of follow-up. Posthoc subgroup analysis, however, suggested a modest benefit among the subgroup of patients with angina before their acute coronary syndromes event.
雷诺嗪已被证明可减少特定慢性心绞痛患者的心肌缺血及症状严重程度。然而,关于雷诺嗪对健康状况/生活质量(QOL)影响的数据有限。
我们在非ST段抬高急性冠脉综合征患者中进行的雷诺嗪降低缺血代谢效率(MERLIN)-TIMI 36试验(一项在6560例非ST段抬高急性冠脉综合征患者中开展的随机、双盲、安慰剂对照的雷诺嗪试验)期间进行了一项前瞻性生活质量分析。使用西雅图心绞痛问卷、罗斯呼吸困难量表、SF-12和欧洲五维健康量表在基线以及入院后4、8和12个月评估健康状况/生活质量。两个治疗组在所有随访时间点的健康状况/生活质量评分均显著改善。在总体人群中,随机接受雷诺嗪治疗与12个月内心绞痛发作频率及西雅图心绞痛问卷生活质量的最小改善相关(P<0.05)。在随后的探索性分析中,雷诺嗪的益处与指数事件前的心绞痛状态之间存在显著交互作用。在既往有心绞痛的患者(n=3565)中,雷诺嗪治疗在整个生活质量领域均有适度益处,在心绞痛发作频率(平均效应=3.4;P<0.001)和西雅图心绞痛问卷生活质量(平均效应=2.7;P<0.001)方面观察到的益处最大。然而,在既往无心绞痛的患者中未观察到显著益处。
在广泛的不稳定冠心病患者群体中,雷诺嗪在大约12个月的随访期间对疾病特异性健康状况和生活质量的影响极小。然而,事后亚组分析表明,在急性冠脉综合征事件前有心绞痛的患者亚组中有适度益处。