Ueng Kwo-Chang, Chiang Chern-En, Chao Ting-Hsing, Wu Yen-Wen, Lee Wen-Lieng, Li Yi-Heng, Ting Ke-Hsin, Su Chun-Hung, Lin Hung-Ju, Su Ta-Chen, Liu Tsun-Jui, Lin Tsung-Hsien, Hsu Po-Chao, Wang Yu-Chen, Chen Zhih-Cherng, Jen Hsu-Lung, Lin Po-Lin, Ko Feng-You, Yen Hsueh-Wei, Chen Wen-Jone, Hou Charles Jia-Yin
Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital; School of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung.
General Clinical Research Center and Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei.
Acta Cardiol Sin. 2023 Jan;39(1):4-96. doi: 10.6515/ACS.202301_39(1).20221103A.
Coronary artery disease (CAD) covers a wide spectrum from persons who are asymptomatic to those presenting with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) and sudden cardiac death. Coronary atherosclerotic disease is a chronic, progressive process that leads to atherosclerotic plaque development and progression within the epicardial coronary arteries. Being a dynamic process, CAD generally presents with a prolonged stable phase, which may then suddenly become unstable and lead to an acute coronary event. Thus, the concept of "stable CAD" may be misleading, as the risk for acute events continues to exist, despite the use of pharmacological therapies and revascularization. Many advances in coronary care have been made, and guidelines from other international societies have been updated. The 2023 guidelines of the Taiwan Society of Cardiology for CAD introduce a new concept that categorizes the disease entity according to its clinical presentation into acute or chronic coronary syndromes (ACS and CCS, respectively). Previously defined as stable CAD, CCS include a heterogeneous population with or without chest pain, with or without prior ACS, and with or without previous coronary revascularization procedures. As cardiologists, we now face the complexity of CAD, which involves not only the epicardial but also the microcirculatory domains of the coronary circulation and the myocardium. New findings about the development and progression of coronary atherosclerosis have changed the clinical landscape. After a nearly 50-year ischemia-centric paradigm of coronary stenosis, growing evidence indicates that coronary atherosclerosis and its features are both diagnostic and therapeutic targets beyond obstructive CAD. Taken together, these factors have shifted the clinicians' focus from the functional evaluation of coronary ischemia to the anatomic burden of disease. Research over the past decades has strengthened the case for prevention and optimal medical therapy as central interventions in patients with CCS. Even though functional capacity has clear prognostic implications, it does not include the evaluation of non-obstructive lesions, plaque burden or additional risk-modifying factors beyond epicardial coronary stenosis-driven ischemia. The recommended first-line diagnostic tests for CCS now include coronary computed tomographic angiography, an increasingly used anatomic imaging modality capable of detecting not only obstructive but also non-obstructive coronary plaques that may be missed with stress testing. This non-invasive anatomical modality improves risk assessment and potentially allows for the appropriate allocation of preventive therapies. Initial invasive strategies cannot improve mortality or the risk of myocardial infarction. Emphasis should be placed on optimizing the control of risk factors through preventive measures, and invasive strategies should be reserved for highly selected patients with refractory symptoms, high ischemic burden, high-risk anatomies, and hemodynamically significant lesions. These guidelines provide current evidence-based diagnosis and treatment recommendations. However, the guidelines are not mandatory, and members of the Task Force fully realize that the treatment of CCS should be individualized to address each patient's circumstances. Ultimately, the decision of healthcare professionals is most important in clinical practice.
冠状动脉疾病(CAD)涵盖了从无症状者到出现急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)和心源性猝死患者的广泛范围。冠状动脉粥样硬化性疾病是一个慢性、渐进性的过程,会导致心外膜冠状动脉内动脉粥样硬化斑块的形成和进展。作为一个动态过程,CAD通常表现为一个较长的稳定期,然后可能突然变得不稳定并导致急性冠状动脉事件。因此,“稳定型CAD”的概念可能会产生误导,因为尽管使用了药物治疗和血运重建,但急性事件的风险仍然存在。冠状动脉护理已经取得了许多进展,其他国际学会的指南也已更新。台湾心脏病学会2023年CAD指南引入了一个新概念,根据临床表现将疾病实体分为急性或慢性冠状动脉综合征(分别为ACS和CCS)。以前定义为稳定型CAD的CCS包括一个异质性群体,有或没有胸痛,有或没有既往ACS,有或没有既往冠状动脉血运重建手术。作为心脏病专家,我们现在面临着CAD的复杂性,它不仅涉及冠状动脉循环的心外膜部分,还涉及微循环领域和心肌。关于冠状动脉粥样硬化发生和进展的新发现改变了临床格局。在经历了近50年以缺血为中心的冠状动脉狭窄范式后,越来越多的证据表明,冠状动脉粥样硬化及其特征既是阻塞性CAD之外的诊断和治疗靶点。综上所述,这些因素已将临床医生的关注点从冠状动脉缺血的功能评估转移到疾病的解剖学负担上。过去几十年的研究强化了预防和优化药物治疗作为CCS患者核心干预措施的理由。尽管功能能力具有明确的预后意义,但它不包括对非阻塞性病变、斑块负担或心外膜冠状动脉狭窄驱动的缺血之外的其他风险修正因素的评估。目前推荐的CCS一线诊断测试包括冠状动脉计算机断层血管造影,这是一种越来越常用的解剖成像方式,不仅能够检测阻塞性冠状动脉斑块,还能检测可能被负荷试验遗漏的非阻塞性冠状动脉斑块。这种非侵入性解剖方式改善了风险评估,并可能允许适当分配预防性治疗。初始侵入性策略并不能降低死亡率或心肌梗死风险。应强调通过预防措施优化风险因素的控制,侵入性策略应保留给高度选择的有难治性症状、高缺血负担、高危解剖结构和血流动力学显著病变的患者。这些指南提供了当前基于证据的诊断和治疗建议。然而,这些指南并非强制性的,特别工作组的成员充分认识到,CCS的治疗应个体化以应对每个患者的具体情况。最终,医疗保健专业人员的决定在临床实践中最为重要。