Suppr超能文献

味觉和嗅觉信号在风味感知中的共激活。

Coactivation of gustatory and olfactory signals in flavor perception.

机构信息

The John B Pierce Laboratory, New Haven, CT 06519, USA.

出版信息

Chem Senses. 2010 Feb;35(2):121-33. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjp089. Epub 2009 Dec 23.

Abstract

It is easier to detect mixtures of gustatory and olfactory flavorants than to detect either component alone. But does the detection of mixtures exceed the level predicted by probability summation, assuming independent detection of each component? To answer this question, we measured simple response times (RTs) to detect brief pulses of one of 3 flavorants (sucrose [gustatory], citral [olfactory], sucrose-citral mixture) or water, presented into the mouth by a computer-operated, automated flow system. Subjects were instructed to press a button as soon as they detected any of the 3 nonwater stimuli. Responses to the mixtures were faster (RTs smaller) than predicted by a model of probability summation of independently detected signals, suggesting positive coactivation (integration) of gustation and retronasal olfaction in flavor perception. Evidence for integration appeared mainly in the fastest 60% of the responses, indicating that integration arises relatively early in flavor processing. Results were similar when the 3 possible flavorants, and water, were interleaved within the same session (experimental condition), and when each flavorant was interleaved with water only (control conditions). This outcome suggests that subjects did not attend selectively to one flavor component or the other in the experimental condition and further supports the conclusion that (late) decisional or attentional strategies do not exert a large influence on the gustatory-olfactory flavor integration.

摘要

与单独检测一种味觉或嗅觉成分相比,人们更容易检测到味觉和嗅觉成分的混合物。但是,假设对每个成分进行独立检测,混合物的检测是否超过概率总和的水平?为了回答这个问题,我们使用计算机操作的自动流系统将 3 种味道剂(蔗糖[味觉]、柠檬醛[嗅觉]、蔗糖-柠檬醛混合物)或水之一短暂脉冲传递到口中,测量了简单的反应时间(RT)以检测到这些刺激中的任何一种。要求被试者一旦检测到任何 3 种非水刺激物之一,就立即按下按钮。与独立检测信号的概率总和模型的预测相比,对混合物的反应更快(RT 更小),这表明味觉和鼻后嗅觉在味道感知中存在正协同激活(整合)。整合的证据主要出现在最快的 60%的反应中,这表明整合在味道处理中相对较早出现。当 3 种可能的味道剂和水在同一会话(实验条件)中混合,或者当每种味道剂仅与水混合(对照条件)时,结果相似。这一结果表明,被试者在实验条件下并没有选择性地关注一种味道成分或另一种味道成分,进一步支持了这样的结论,即(后期)决策或注意力策略对味觉-嗅觉味道整合没有很大影响。

相似文献

1
3
Flavor-intensity perception: effects of stimulus context.风味强度感知:刺激环境的影响。
Physiol Behav. 2012 Jan 18;105(2):443-50. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2011.08.039. Epub 2011 Sep 10.
9
Flavor Identification and Intensity: Effects of Stimulus Context.风味识别与强度:刺激情境的影响。
Chem Senses. 2016 Mar;41(3):249-59. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjv087. Epub 2016 Jan 31.

引用本文的文献

9

本文引用的文献

2
The multisensory perception of flavor.风味的多感官感知。
Conscious Cogn. 2008 Sep;17(3):1016-31. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2007.06.005. Epub 2007 Aug 3.
6
The Temporal Automated System for Taste Experiments (TASTE).
Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 2004 Feb;36(1):83-8. doi: 10.3758/bf03195552.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验