Suppr超能文献

内镜超声检查(EUS)、正电子发射断层扫描(PET)和计算机断层扫描(CT)在可切除食管癌术前局部区域分期中的比较。

Comparison of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS), positron emission tomography (PET), and computed tomography (CT) in the preoperative locoregional staging of resectable esophageal cancer.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine and Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Yongun-dong 28, Chongno-gu, Seoul 110-744, South Korea.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2010 Jun;24(6):1380-6. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0783-x. Epub 2009 Dec 24.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) has been a useful method for the accurate staging of esophageal cancer. This study aimed to compare the diagnostic performance of EUS, positron emission tomography (PET), and computed tomography (CT) in the locoregional staging of resectable esophageal cancer.

METHODS

A total of 109 patients with resectable esophageal cancer were prospectively enrolled and retrospectively reviewed for evaluation of preoperative EUS, PET, and CT. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of tumor depth (T) staging and regional lymph nodal (N) staging for each test were compared with the postoperative histopathologic stage as the gold standard.

RESULTS

The overall accuracy of EUS for T staging was 72%, and it was the only method for delineating the layers of the esophageal wall. The sensitivities for N staging were 42% for EUS, 49% for PET, and 35% for CT, and their specificities were, respectively, 91, 87, and 93%. The accuracy for N staging was 66% for EUS, 68% for PET, and 63% for CT, and it did not differ significantly across the three tests.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative EUS for the locoregional staging of esophageal cancer provides excellent T staging accuracy and similar accuracy for N staging compared with PET and CT. Especially in T staging, EUS could play an important role in the choice of candidates for esophageal cancer surgery.

摘要

背景

内镜超声检查(EUS)已成为一种用于准确分期食管癌的有用方法。本研究旨在比较 EUS、正电子发射断层扫描(PET)和计算机断层扫描(CT)在可切除食管癌局部区域分期中的诊断性能。

方法

共前瞻性纳入 109 例可切除食管癌患者,回顾性评估术前 EUS、PET 和 CT。将每种检查的肿瘤深度(T)分期和区域淋巴结(N)分期的敏感性、特异性和准确性与术后组织病理学分期作为金标准进行比较。

结果

EUS 对 T 分期的总体准确性为 72%,是唯一能够描绘食管壁各层的方法。EUS、PET 和 CT 对 N 分期的敏感度分别为 42%、49%和 35%,特异度分别为 91%、87%和 93%。EUS 对 N 分期的准确性为 66%、PET 为 68%、CT 为 63%,三种检查方法之间无显著差异。

结论

术前 EUS 对食管癌的局部区域分期可提供出色的 T 分期准确性,并与 PET 和 CT 具有相似的 N 分期准确性。特别是在 T 分期方面,EUS 可在食管癌手术候选者的选择中发挥重要作用。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验