• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

药物安全问题的早期沟通:一项增强制药行业与监管机构互动的可行性研究。

Early communication of drug safety concerns: a feasibility study on enhancing interaction between the pharmaceutical industry and regulators.

机构信息

GlaxoSmithKline, Global Clinical Safety and Pharmacovigilance, Harlow, Essex, CM19 5AW, UK.

出版信息

Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2010 Mar;19(3):232-7. doi: 10.1002/pds.1898.

DOI:10.1002/pds.1898
PMID:20033909
Abstract

PURPOSE

The responsibility for monitoring the safety of marketed medicines is shared between regulatory authorities and the pharmaceutical industry and is underpinned by legal obligations on both sides. Both marketing authorisation holders (MAHs) and regulators initially evaluate and investigate potential safety concerns, and then work together on further review as appropriate. We wanted to test the feasibility of enhanced interaction between MAH and regulator via a regular monthly, two-way communication of potential safety concerns between the MAHs and the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA). It was envisaged that such a process would aid prioritisation and planning by both parties, avoid duplication of effort and support a collaborative approach for decision making.

METHODS

Four MAHs took part in the pilot, which was conducted between July 2007 and June 2008. Potential safety concerns were exchanged on a monthly basis. The MAH/MHRA proposed a timeline for evaluation of each potential safety concern. The pilot did not include serious public health issues which are immediately reported to regulatory authorities.

RESULTS

During the pilot, 136 potential safety concerns were exchanged. Thirteen per cent of these resulted in a change to product information for health professionals and patients. There was concurrence between the MAHs and MHRA on timelines proposed for evaluation.

CONCLUSIONS

The pilot proved feasible for the companies involved and indicated potential benefits of a system for avoiding duplication of effort and supporting a collaborative approach to planning and prioritisation of investigation of potential safety concerns between pharmaceutical industry and regulatory authorities.

摘要

目的

上市药品的安全性监测责任由监管机构和制药行业共同承担,并以双方的法律义务为基础。药品上市许可持有人(MAH)和监管机构最初都对潜在的安全问题进行评估和调查,然后根据需要共同进行进一步的审查。我们希望通过 MAH 和监管机构之间定期每月进行潜在安全问题的双向沟通,来测试加强 MAH 和监管机构之间互动的可行性。设想这样的过程将有助于双方的优先排序和规划,避免重复工作,并支持协作决策方法。

方法

四家 MAH 参与了该试点,该试点于 2007 年 7 月至 2008 年 6 月进行。每月交换潜在安全问题。MAH/MHRA 提出了评估每个潜在安全问题的时间表。该试点不包括严重的公共卫生问题,这些问题会立即报告给监管机构。

结果

在试点期间,共交换了 136 个潜在安全问题。其中 13%导致了对专业医务人员和患者的产品信息的更改。MAH 和 MHRA 在评估时间表上达成了一致。

结论

该试点对参与的公司来说是可行的,并表明了一种避免重复工作、支持协作方法的系统的潜在好处,以规划和优先考虑制药行业和监管机构之间潜在安全问题的调查。

相似文献

1
Early communication of drug safety concerns: a feasibility study on enhancing interaction between the pharmaceutical industry and regulators.药物安全问题的早期沟通:一项增强制药行业与监管机构互动的可行性研究。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2010 Mar;19(3):232-7. doi: 10.1002/pds.1898.
2
Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.德国药品效益评估的程序和方法。
Eur J Health Econ. 2008 Nov;9 Suppl 1:5-29. doi: 10.1007/s10198-008-0122-5.
3
The US drug safety system: role of the pharmaceutical industry.美国药品安全系统:制药行业的作用。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2008 Feb;17(2):110-4. doi: 10.1002/pds.1467.
4
Provision of information on regulatory authorities' websites.在监管机构网站上提供信息。
Intern Med J. 2008 Jul;38(7):559-67. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2007.01588.x. Epub 2008 Mar 11.
5
[Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany].[德国药品效益评估的程序和方法]
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2008 Dec;133 Suppl 7:S225-46. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1100954. Epub 2008 Nov 25.
6
Preparation of Direct Healthcare Professional Communication: An Exploratory Study on the Experiences and Perceptions of European Pharmaceutical Companies and the EMA.直接医疗专业人员沟通的准备:对欧洲制药公司和 EMA 的经验和看法的探索性研究。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2020 May;54(3):631-639. doi: 10.1007/s43441-019-00097-z. Epub 2020 Jan 6.
7
If children ruled the pharmaceutical industry: the need for pediatric formulations.如果由儿童掌管制药行业:儿科制剂的必要性。
Drug News Perspect. 2010 Sep;23(7):458-64. doi: 10.1358/dnp.2010.23.7.1458283.
8
[Contact and dialogue between drug companies and the global regulatory authorities throughout research and development phase].[制药公司与全球监管机构在整个研发阶段的接触与对话]
Ugeskr Laeger. 2003 Apr 14;165(16):1649-52.
9
The innovative medicines initiative: a European response to the innovation challenge.创新药物倡议:欧洲对创新挑战的回应。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2012 Mar;91(3):418-25. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2011.321. Epub 2012 Feb 8.
10
Issues with regulatory pharmacovigilance in East European countries: the industry perspective.东欧国家药品监管中的药物警戒问题:行业视角
Toxicol Lett. 2007 Feb 5;168(3):228-35. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2006.10.019. Epub 2006 Nov 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Validation of Instruments for Assessing Drug Safety Management During the Conduction of Clinical Trials.临床试验实施过程中药物安全管理评估工具的验证。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2018 Jul 1;7(7):623-629. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2017.140.