Josephson Cassandra D, Castillejo Marta-Inés, Grima Kathleen, Hillyer Christopher D
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Center for Transfusion and Cellular Therapies, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia 30322, USA.
Transfus Apher Sci. 2010 Feb;42(1):83-8. doi: 10.1016/j.transci.2009.10.013. Epub 2010 Jan 19.
Clinically significant hemolysis is a rare but potentially severe complication of administering an ABO-mismatched platelet transfusion. Platelet products from Group O donors, particularly single donor platelets (SDP) are most commonly implicated in these reactions. This is due to the presence of unusually high titers of anti-A which can be found in the plasma of some Group O donors and the large plasma volume of SDPs. These products can cause significant hemolysis when infused into a Group A or AB recipient. Random donor platelets from Group O donors have also been implicated. In practice, platelets are frequently transfused across ABO barriers though, ideally, in order to prevent or mitigate these reactions, platelet transfusions that are matched for ABO should be administered. However, limited availability of donor platelets as well as an abundance of Group O donors makes this a difficult standard to adhere to since often out-of group products are the only ones available. Methods to improve the safety of Group O products have focused on defining a safe level of isohemagglutinins so that the risk of hemolysis is alleviated when mismatched products are transfused. Determining the critical titer which defines a level above which a mismatched product should not be administered has been challenging. Non-standardized methods of isohemagglutinin titering and varying reports in the literature where products with a wide range of titers have been implicated in acute hemolytic transfusion reactions have made it difficult to determine a cut-off for labeling a product as high titer and thereby restricting its use to O recipients. Standards in the US place the responsibility for designing and implementing policies for the use of mismatched platelet products on each individual hospital transfusion service. Compliance requires only that there be an existing written policy which addresses the transfusion of products containing incompatible ABO antibodies but no specific procedures are required. In sharp contrast, European strategies have defined the low-end titer for which an out-of-group transfusion should not be given to an ABO-incompatible recipient. This testing is performed centrally at the Blood Centers who then make the determination on the status of a "dangerous donor". The progress in this European strategy may serve the US to stimulate a re-examination of its practices and policies for the advancement of platelet transfusion safety.
具有临床意义的溶血是输注 ABO 血型不匹配的血小板时罕见但可能严重的并发症。O 型供者的血小板制品,尤其是单采血小板(SDP)最常与这些反应有关。这是因为在一些 O 型供者的血浆中可发现异常高滴度的抗 A 抗体,以及 SDP 的血浆量较大。当将这些制品输注给 A 型或 AB 型受者时,可导致显著的溶血。O 型供者的随机供者血小板也有相关报道。实际上,血小板经常跨 ABO 血型屏障输注,不过,理想情况下,为预防或减轻这些反应,应输注 ABO 血型匹配的血小板。然而,供者血小板供应有限以及 O 型供者数量众多,使得这一标准难以遵守,因为通常非同型产品是唯一可用的。提高 O 型产品安全性的方法集中在确定同种血凝素的安全水平,以便在输注不匹配产品时降低溶血风险。确定定义不匹配产品不应输注的临界滴度一直具有挑战性。同种血凝素滴度测定方法不标准,且文献中有各种不同的报道,其中滴度范围广泛的产品都与急性溶血性输血反应有关,这使得难以确定将产品标记为高滴度并因此将其使用限制于 O 型受者的临界值。美国的标准将设计和实施不匹配血小板制品使用政策的责任赋予每个医院的输血服务部门。合规仅要求有一份现有的书面政策,该政策涉及含有不相容 ABO 抗体的产品的输注,但不需要具体程序。与之形成鲜明对比的是,欧洲的策略定义了不应向 ABO 血型不相容受者进行非同型输血的低滴度界限。这种检测在血液中心集中进行,然后由血液中心确定“危险供者”的状态。欧洲这一策略的进展可能促使美国重新审视其做法和政策,以提高血小板输血安全性。