Suppr超能文献

医护人员对呼吸器使用的看法,以及下一代呼吸器应具备的特点。

Health care workers' views about respirator use and features that should be included in the next generation of respirators.

机构信息

National Center for Occupational Health and Infection Control, Office of Public Health and Environmental Hazards, Veterans Health Administration, US Department of Veterans Affairs, Gainesville, FL 23608, USA.

出版信息

Am J Infect Control. 2010 Feb;38(1):18-25. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2009.09.005. Epub 2009 Dec 29.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Numerous studies have demonstrated that health care workers are, in general, poorly compliant with respiratory protection guidelines, especially when a N95 respirator is recommended. The purpose of this study was to assess health care workers' views about respirator use and the features they prefer to be included in the next generation of respirators.

METHODS

A 63-item survey was distributed to health care workers in 27 units of 2 tertiary care medical centers.

RESULTS

From a total of 559 surveys distributed at both hospitals, 159 responses were returned (response rate, 28%). Survey results indicated that health care workers seek respirators that are more comfortable, interfere less with breathing, diminish heat buildup, are disposable, and permit the user to have facial hair. Multivariate analyses suggest that emergency department staff had 12.3 greater odds of wanting a new respirator (P = .031) as compared with their referent group. Males were more likely to indicate that the N95 respirator was comfortable to wear versus females (P = .003).

CONCLUSION

To increase substantially the acceptance of respiratory protective equipment and improve compliance rates, respirators should be modified to meet the specific needs of health care workers.

摘要

背景

大量研究表明,医护人员总体上对呼吸防护指南的遵守情况较差,尤其是当推荐使用 N95 呼吸器时。本研究旨在评估医护人员对呼吸器使用的看法,以及他们希望在下一代呼吸器中包含的功能。

方法

向 2 家 3 级护理医疗中心的 27 个单位的医护人员分发了一份 63 项的调查问卷。

结果

在这两家医院共发放了 559 份调查问卷,共收到 159 份回复(回复率为 28%)。调查结果表明,医护人员希望呼吸器更舒适、呼吸干扰更小、热量积聚减少、一次性使用且允许使用者留胡须。多变量分析表明,与参照组相比,急诊科工作人员对新呼吸器的需求增加了 12.3 倍(P =.031)。与女性相比,男性更倾向于表示 N95 呼吸器佩戴舒适(P =.003)。

结论

为了大幅提高呼吸防护设备的接受程度并提高合规率,应根据医护人员的具体需求对呼吸器进行改进。

相似文献

1
Health care workers' views about respirator use and features that should be included in the next generation of respirators.
Am J Infect Control. 2010 Feb;38(1):18-25. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2009.09.005. Epub 2009 Dec 29.
3
B95: a new respirator for health care personnel.
Am J Infect Control. 2013 Dec;41(12):1224-30. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2013.03.293. Epub 2013 May 29.
5
Under-mask beard covers achieve an adequate seal with tight-fitting disposable respirators using quantitative fit testing.
J Hosp Infect. 2022 Oct;128:8-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2022.05.015. Epub 2022 May 31.
6
N95 respirators: quantitative fit test pass rates and usability and comfort assessment by health care workers.
Med J Aust. 2022 Jul 18;217(2):88-93. doi: 10.5694/mja2.51585. Epub 2022 May 29.
7
User acceptance of reusable respirators in health care.
Am J Infect Control. 2019 Jun;47(6):648-655. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2018.11.021. Epub 2019 Jan 10.

引用本文的文献

2
Examination of factors that impact mask or respirator purchase and usage during the COVID-19 pandemic.
PLoS One. 2024 Sep 25;19(9):e0308841. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308841. eCollection 2024.
3
Experiences when using different EHMR models: Implications for different designs and meeting user expectations.
Am J Infect Control. 2025 Jan;53(1):144-149. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2024.08.019. Epub 2024 Aug 25.
4
Speech intelligibility in respiratory protective equipment - Implications for verbal communication in critical care.
Trends Anaesth Crit Care. 2021 Feb;36:23-29. doi: 10.1016/j.tacc.2020.08.006. Epub 2020 Aug 15.
5
Impact of personal protective equipment on patient safety and health care workers.
Med J Armed Forces India. 2023 Sep-Oct;79(5):531-538. doi: 10.1016/j.mjafi.2021.07.004. Epub 2021 Oct 19.
6
Prospective analysis of the physiological changes caused by prolonged use of N95-type masks.
Ann Thorac Med. 2023 Apr-Jun;18(2):86-89. doi: 10.4103/atm.atm_429_22. Epub 2023 Apr 25.
7
A Review of Filtration Performance of Protective Masks.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 28;20(3):2346. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20032346.
8
N95 respirators: quantitative fit test pass rates and usability and comfort assessment by health care workers.
Med J Aust. 2022 Jul 18;217(2):88-93. doi: 10.5694/mja2.51585. Epub 2022 May 29.
9
Enhanced protection face masks do not adversely impact thermophysiological comfort.
PLoS One. 2022 Apr 7;17(4):e0265126. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265126. eCollection 2022.
10
Design considerations for protective mask development: A remote mask usability evaluation.
Appl Ergon. 2022 Jul;102:103751. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2022.103751. Epub 2022 Mar 24.

本文引用的文献

1
Surgical mask vs N95 respirator for preventing influenza among health care workers: a randomized trial.
JAMA. 2009 Nov 4;302(17):1865-71. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1466. Epub 2009 Oct 1.
2
Gender differences in thermal comfort and mental performance at different vertical air temperatures.
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2010 May;109(1):41-8. doi: 10.1007/s00421-009-1158-7. Epub 2009 Aug 22.
3
The physician's role in reducing SIDS.
Health Promot Pract. 2011 May;12(3):370-8. doi: 10.1177/1524839909341033. Epub 2009 Jul 20.
4
Respirator physiological effects under simulated work conditions.
J Occup Environ Hyg. 2009 Apr;6(4):221-7. doi: 10.1080/15459620902729218.
5
Respirator tolerance in health care workers.
JAMA. 2009 Jan 7;301(1):36-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.2008.894.
7
Sex differences in denture satisfaction.
J Dent. 2008 May;36(5):301-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2008.02.009. Epub 2008 Apr 3.
8
What do healthcare workers think? A survey of facial protection equipment user preferences.
J Hosp Infect. 2008 Mar;68(3):241-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2007.12.007. Epub 2008 Mar 4.
9
Physician recommendations regarding SIDS risk reduction: a national survey of pediatricians and family physicians.
Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2007 Nov;46(9):791-800. doi: 10.1177/0009922807303894. Epub 2007 Jul 19.
10
Determinants of healthcare workers' compliance with infection control procedures.
Healthc Q. 2007;10(1):44-52. doi: 10.12927/hcq.2007.18648.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验