Suppr超能文献

增强防护口罩不会对热生理舒适度产生不良影响。

Enhanced protection face masks do not adversely impact thermophysiological comfort.

机构信息

School of Engineering, University of British Columbia, Kelowna, Canada.

Department of Mechanical & Industrial Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2022 Apr 7;17(4):e0265126. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265126. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

The World Health Organization has advocated mandatory face mask usage to combat the spread of COVID-19, with multilayer masks recommended for enhanced protection. However, this recommendation has not been widely adopted, with noncompliant persons citing discomfort during prolonged usage of face masks. And yet, a scientific understanding on how face mask fabrics/garment systems affect thermophysiological comfort remains lacking. We aimed to investigate how fabric/garment properties alter the thermal and evaporative resistances responsible for thermophysiological strain. We constructed 12 different layered facemasks (D1-D5, T1-T6, Q1) with various filters using commercially available fabrics. Three approaches were employed: (1) the evaporative and thermal resistances were measured in all the test face masks using the medium size to determine the effect of fabric properties; (2) the effect of face mask size by testing close-fitted (small), fitted (medium) and loose fitted (large) face mask T-6; (3) the effect of face mask fit by donning a large size face mask T-6, both loose and tightened using thermal manikin, Newton. ANOVA test revealed that the additional N95 middle layer filter has no significant effect on the thermal resistances of all the face masks, and evaporative resistances except for face masks T-2 and T-3 (P-values<0.05) whereas size significantly affected thermal and evaporative resistances (P-values<0.05). The correlation coefficient between the air gap size and the thermal and evaporative resistance of face masks T-6 were R2 = 0.96 and 0.98, respectively. The tight fit large face mask had superior performance in the dissipation of heat and moisture from the skin (P-values <0.05). Three-layer masks incorporating filters and water-resistant and antimicrobial/antiviral finishes did not increase discomfort. Interestingly, using face masks with fitters improved user comfort, decreasing thermal and evaporative resistances in direct opposition to the preconceived notion that safer masks decrease comfort.

摘要

世界卫生组织提倡佩戴口罩以控制 COVID-19 的传播,建议使用多层口罩以增强防护效果。然而,这一建议并未得到广泛采纳,不遵守规定的人声称长时间佩戴口罩会感到不适。尽管如此,对于口罩织物/服装系统如何影响热生理舒适度,科学界仍缺乏了解。我们旨在研究织物/服装特性如何改变导致热生理应激的热阻和蒸发热阻。我们使用市售的各种织物制作了 12 种不同的分层口罩(D1-D5、T1-T6、Q1),并使用不同的过滤器。采用了三种方法:(1)使用中号测试所有测试口罩的蒸发和热阻力,以确定织物特性的影响;(2)通过测试紧密贴合(小号)、贴合(中号)和宽松贴合(大号)T-6 口罩来测试口罩尺寸的影响;(3)使用热人体模型牛顿(Newton)佩戴大号 T-6 口罩并使其宽松和收紧,测试口罩贴合度的影响。方差分析(ANOVA)测试结果表明,除了 T-2 和 T-3 口罩(P 值<0.05)之外,额外的 N95 中间层过滤器对所有口罩的热阻力和蒸发阻力没有显著影响,而尺寸对热阻力和蒸发阻力有显著影响(P 值<0.05)。T-6 口罩的空气间隙尺寸与热阻力和蒸发阻力之间的相关系数分别为 R2=0.96 和 0.98。紧密贴合的大号口罩在皮肤散热和排湿方面表现出色(P 值<0.05)。三层口罩中加入过滤器以及防水和抗菌/抗病毒涂层并不会增加不适感。有趣的是,使用贴合度更好的口罩可以提高用户的舒适度,降低热阻和蒸发阻力,这与更安全的口罩会降低舒适度的观念相反。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf1e/8989302/bf4f6102da93/pone.0265126.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验