Macias Cathaleene, Aronson Elliot, Hargreaves William, Weary Gifford, Barreira Paul J, Harvey John, Rodican Charles F, Bickman Leonard, Fisher William
Community Intervention Research, McLean Hospital, Belmont, MA.
J Appl Soc Psychol. 2009 Aug 1;39(8):1835-1859. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2009.00506.x.
A field study of supported employment for adults with mental illness (N=174) provided an experimental test of cognitive dissonance theory. We predicted that most work-interested individuals randomly assigned to a non-preferred program would reject services and lower their work aspirations. However, individuals who chose to pursue employment through a non-preferred program were expected to resolve this dissonance through favorable service evaluations and strong efforts to succeed at work. Significant work interest-by-service preference interactions supported these predictions. Over two years, participants interested in employment who obtained work through a non-preferred program stayed employed a median of 362 days versus 108 days for those assigned to a preferred program, and participants who obtained work through a non-preferred program had higher service satisfaction.
一项针对成年精神疾病患者(N = 174)的支持性就业实地研究对认知失调理论进行了实证检验。我们预测,大多数被随机分配到非首选项目的有工作意愿的个体将会拒绝服务并降低其工作期望。然而,那些选择通过非首选项目来寻求就业的个体,预计会通过积极的服务评价和在工作中取得成功的强烈努力来解决这种失调。显著的工作意愿与服务偏好交互作用支持了这些预测。在两年多的时间里,通过非首选项目获得工作的有就业意愿的参与者,就业时间中位数为362天,而被分配到首选项目的参与者为108天,并且通过非首选项目获得工作的参与者对服务的满意度更高。