Suppr超能文献

美国胃肠内镜外科学会(SAGES)关于专业医学协会与行业之间关系的声明。

Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons(SAGES)statement on the relationship between professional medical associations and industry.

机构信息

11300 W, Olympic Blvd., Suite 600, Los Angeles, CA 90064, USA.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2010 Apr;24(4):742-4. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0802-y.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Surgical societies, including SAGES, distribute grant funds to support research, as well as to promote recipient careers. Although we hypothesize that these awards have a positive impact, no objective evidence exists. We sought to benchmark the scientific productivity of the grants, the academic success of the recipients, and the generation of further research projects.

METHODS

All SAGES grant principle investigators (PI) and co-PIs were surveyed using Survey Monkey™. Questions included resultant presentations/publications, ensuing funding, academic promotion, further research initiatives, and opinions on grant impact. A Medline query of all grant recipients was used to verify and supplement this data.

RESULTS

48 of 108 recipients (44%) responded to the survey, with 81% of respondents listed as the PI. The majority of the funded studies (73%) were accepted for presentation at a national meeting, with 89% presented at SAGES and 9% receiving various meeting awards. Grant recipients attended 3.8 of the last 5 SAGES meetings. Respondents also reported a 64% rate of publication, with the majority published in (68%). Of recipients, 84% had at least one publication identified by a Medline search, with an average of 32 papers since grant completion. Among the awardees, 43% received further research funding, most frequently (43%) from a professional organization and occasionally (7%) from the National Institutes of Health. The amount of extramural funding received was greater than US $50,000 for 67% of the awardees, with half of those receiving more than US $200,000.

CONCLUSION

SAGES grants have a strong impact on recipient academic careers. Future funding, society activism, and publication are favorably influenced by these grants. SAGES should continue to support research with this successful mechanism as a necessary tool for the academic growth of recipients and development of research deemed important by SAGES.

摘要

简介

包括 SAGES 在内的外科协会分配赠款资金以支持研究,并促进受赠者的职业发展。尽管我们假设这些奖项具有积极影响,但没有客观证据存在。我们试图对这些赠款的科研产出、受赠者的学术成就以及进一步研究项目的产生进行基准测试。

方法

使用 Survey Monkey™对所有 SAGES 赠款主要研究者(PI)和共同研究者进行了调查。问题包括研究成果的展示/发表、后续资金、学术晋升、进一步的研究计划以及对赠款影响的看法。使用 Medline 对所有赠款接受者进行了查询,以验证和补充这些数据。

结果

48 名(44%)接受者对调查做出了回应,81%的回应者被列为 PI。大多数资助研究(73%)被接受在全国会议上展示,其中 9%在 SAGES 会议上展示,9%获得了各种会议奖项。赠款接受者参加了过去 5 次 SAGES 会议中的 3.8 次。受访者还报告了 64%的发表率,其中大部分发表在(68%)。在接受者中,84%至少有一篇由 Medline 搜索确定的出版物,自赠款完成以来平均有 32 篇论文。在获奖者中,43%获得了进一步的研究资金,最常见的是(43%)来自专业组织,偶尔(7%)来自美国国立卫生研究院。67%的获奖者获得的外部资助超过 50,000 美元,其中一半获奖者获得的超过 200,000 美元。

结论

SAGES 赠款对受赠者的学术生涯有很大影响。未来的资金、社会活动和发表都受到这些赠款的有利影响。SAGES 应继续通过这一成功机制支持研究,作为受赠者学术成长和 SAGES 认为重要的研究发展的必要工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f1fb/2869439/a99c0b11a322/464_2009_802_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验