Department of Neurosurgery, The National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, WC1N 3BG, UK.
Eur Spine J. 2010 Feb;19(2):215-22. doi: 10.1007/s00586-009-1252-x. Epub 2009 Dec 29.
Choosing the right operation for metastatic spinal tumours is often difficult, and depends on many factors, including life expectancy and the balance of the risk of surgery against the likelihood of improving quality of life. Several prognostic scores have been devised to help the clinician decide the most appropriate course of action, but there still remains controversy over how to choose the best option; more often the decision is influenced by habit, belief and subjective experience. The purpose of this article is to review the present systems available for classifying spinal metastases, how these classifications can be used to help surgical planning, discuss surgical outcomes, and make suggestions for future research. It is important for spinal surgeons to reach a consensus regarding the classification of spinal metastases and surgical strategies. The authors of this article constitute the Global Spine Tumour Study Group: an international group of spinal surgeons who are dedicated to studying the techniques and outcomes of surgery for spinal tumours, to build on the existing evidence base for the surgical treatment of spinal tumours.
选择治疗转移性脊柱肿瘤的正确方法往往很困难,需要考虑许多因素,包括预期寿命和手术风险与提高生活质量的可能性之间的平衡。已经设计了几种预后评分来帮助临床医生决定最合适的治疗方案,但对于如何选择最佳方案仍存在争议;更多情况下,决策受到习惯、信念和主观经验的影响。本文旨在回顾目前可用于分类脊柱转移瘤的系统,以及这些分类如何用于帮助手术计划、讨论手术结果,并为未来的研究提出建议。脊柱外科医生需要就脊柱转移瘤的分类和手术策略达成共识。本文的作者构成了全球脊柱肿瘤研究组:一个致力于研究脊柱肿瘤手术技术和结果的国际脊柱外科医生组织,旨在为脊柱肿瘤的手术治疗建立在现有的证据基础上。