Distler Oliver, Eich Wolfgang, Dokoupilova Eva, Dvorak Zdenek, Fleck Martin, Gaubitz Markus, Hechler Manfred, Jansen Jan-Peter, Krause Andreas, Bendszus Martin, Pache Lothar, Reiter Rudolf, Müller-Ladner Ulf
University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Arthritis Rheum. 2010 Jan;62(1):291-300. doi: 10.1002/art.25062.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of terguride, a partial dopamine agonist, in patients with fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS). METHODS: In a 12-week, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study, 99 patients were randomized at a ratio of 2 to 1 to receive terguride or placebo. Over 21 days, the dosage was titrated to a maximum daily dose of 3 mg of terguride or placebo, and this fixed dosage was continued over 9 weeks. The primary efficacy variable was the intensity of pain (100-mm visual analog scale). Secondary efficacy variables included the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) score, the tender point score (TPS), and the Hamilton Depression Scale (HDS) score. During the study, patients were evaluated for the presence of cervical spine stenosis by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). RESULTS: No significant differences in the change in pain intensity, FIQ score, TPS, or HDS score between baseline and 12 weeks were observed in the terguride group as compared with the placebo group. Cervical spine stenosis was detected in 22% of the patients. Only patients with cervical spine stenosis responded to terguride treatment. FIQ scores improved significantly (per-protocol analysis), and pain intensity, the TPS score, and the HDS score showed a trend toward improvement in the terguride group as compared with the placebo group. Terguride treatment was safe. Only those adverse events already known to be side effects of terguride were observed. Premature termination of the study in patients receiving terguride (26%) occurred predominantly during up-titration and in the absence of comedication for treatment of nausea. CONCLUSION: Terguride treatment did not improve pain, the FIQ score, the TPS, or the HDS score in the total study population. However, a subgroup of patients with cervical spine stenosis seemed to benefit from terguride treatment.
目的:评估部分多巴胺激动剂泰舒达在纤维肌痛综合征(FMS)患者中的疗效和安全性。 方法:在一项为期12周的多中心、双盲、安慰剂对照、平行组研究中,99例患者按2:1的比例随机分组,分别接受泰舒达或安慰剂治疗。在21天内,将剂量滴定至泰舒达或安慰剂的最大日剂量3mg,并在接下来的9周内维持该固定剂量。主要疗效变量为疼痛强度(100mm视觉模拟量表)。次要疗效变量包括纤维肌痛影响问卷(FIQ)评分、压痛点评分(TPS)和汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HDS)评分。在研究期间,通过磁共振成像(MRI)评估患者是否存在颈椎管狭窄。 结果:与安慰剂组相比,泰舒达组在基线和12周时疼痛强度、FIQ评分、TPS或HDS评分的变化无显著差异。22%的患者检测出颈椎管狭窄。只有颈椎管狭窄的患者对泰舒达治疗有反应。FIQ评分显著改善(符合方案分析),与安慰剂组相比,泰舒达组的疼痛强度、TPS评分和HDS评分有改善趋势。泰舒达治疗是安全的。仅观察到那些已知为泰舒达副作用的不良事件。接受泰舒达治疗的患者(26%)提前终止研究主要发生在剂量滴定期间且未同时使用治疗恶心的药物时。 结论:在整个研究人群中,泰舒达治疗并未改善疼痛、FIQ评分、TPS或HDS评分。然而,颈椎管狭窄的患者亚组似乎从泰舒达治疗中获益。
Health Psychol Res. 2021-7-10
Pharmacol Res. 2020-11
Pain Res Manag. 2020-2-11
Biomedicines. 2017-5-8
Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2011-7-19
Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2011-10