Suppr超能文献

一项针对正在接受辅助药物治疗的纤维肌痛患者,使用多巴胺激动剂普拉克索进行的随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验。

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of pramipexole, a dopamine agonist, in patients with fibromyalgia receiving concomitant medications.

作者信息

Holman Andrew J, Myers Robin R

机构信息

Pacific Rheumatology Associates, Renton, Washington 98055, USA.

出版信息

Arthritis Rheum. 2005 Aug;52(8):2495-505. doi: 10.1002/art.21191.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy and safety of pramipexole, a dopamine 3 receptor agonist, in patients with fibromyalgia.

METHODS

In this 14-week, single-center, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, escalating-dose trial, 60 patients with fibromyalgia were randomized 2:1 (pramipexole:placebo) to receive 4.5 mg of pramipexole or placebo orally every evening. The primary outcome was improvement in the pain score (10-cm visual analog scale [VAS]) at 14 weeks. Secondary outcome measures were the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ), the Multidimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire (MDHAQ), the pain improvement scale, the tender point score, the 17-question Hamilton Depression Inventory (HAM-d), and the Beck Anxiety Index (BAI). Patients with comorbidities and disability were not excluded. Stable dosages of concomitant medications, including analgesics, were allowed.

RESULTS

Compared with the placebo group, patients receiving pramipexole experienced gradual and more significant improvement in measures of pain, fatigue, function, and global status. At 14 weeks, the VAS pain score decreased 36% in the pramipexole arm and 9% in the placebo arm (treatment difference -1.77 cm). Forty-two percent of patients receiving pramipexole and 14% of those receiving placebo achieved > or =50% decrease in pain. Secondary outcomes favoring pramipexole over placebo included the total FIQ score (treatment difference -9.57) and the percentages of improvement in function (22% versus 0%), fatigue (29% versus 7%), and global (38% versus 3%) scores on the MDHAQ. Compared with baseline, some outcomes showed a better trend for pramipexole treatment than for placebo, but failed to reach statistical significance, including improvement in the tender point score (51% versus 36%) and decreases in the MDHAQ psychiatric score (37% versus 28%), the BAI score (39% versus 27%), and the HAM-d score (29% versus 9%). No end points showed a better trend for the placebo arm. The most common adverse events associated with pramipexole were transient anxiety and weight loss. No patient withdrew from the study because of inefficacy or an adverse event related to pramipexole.

CONCLUSION

In a subset of patients with fibromyalgia, approximately 50% of whom required narcotic analgesia and/or were disabled, treatment with pramipexole improved scores on assessments of pain, fatigue, function, and global status, and was safe and well-tolerated.

摘要

目的

评估多巴胺3受体激动剂普拉克索治疗纤维肌痛患者的疗效和安全性。

方法

在这项为期14周的单中心、双盲、安慰剂对照、平行组、剂量递增试验中,60例纤维肌痛患者按2:1随机分组(普拉克索:安慰剂),每晚口服4.5毫克普拉克索或安慰剂。主要结局是14周时疼痛评分(10厘米视觉模拟量表[VAS])的改善情况。次要结局指标包括纤维肌痛影响问卷(FIQ)、多维健康评估问卷(MDHAQ)、疼痛改善量表、压痛点评分、17项汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAM-d)和贝克焦虑指数(BAI)。不排除患有合并症和残疾的患者。允许使用包括镇痛药在内的稳定剂量的伴随药物。

结果

与安慰剂组相比,接受普拉克索治疗的患者在疼痛、疲劳、功能和总体状况测量方面有逐渐且更显著的改善。在14周时,普拉克索组的VAS疼痛评分下降了36%,安慰剂组下降了9%(治疗差异-1.77厘米)。接受普拉克索治疗的患者中有42%、接受安慰剂治疗的患者中有14%的疼痛减轻≥50%。与安慰剂相比,普拉克索更有利的次要结局包括FIQ总分(治疗差异-9.57)以及MDHAQ上功能改善百分比(22%对0%)、疲劳改善百分比(29%对7%)和总体改善百分比(38%对3%)。与基线相比,一些结局显示普拉克索治疗比安慰剂有更好的趋势,但未达到统计学显著性,包括压痛点评分的改善(51%对36%)以及MDHAQ精神评分的下降(37%对28%)、BAI评分的下降(39%对27%)和HAM-d评分的下降(29%对9%)。没有终点指标显示安慰剂组有更好的趋势。与普拉克索相关的最常见不良事件是短暂性焦虑和体重减轻。没有患者因无效或与普拉克索相关的不良事件退出研究。

结论

在一部分纤维肌痛患者中,其中约50%需要使用麻醉性镇痛药和/或存在残疾,普拉克索治疗可改善疼痛、疲劳、功能和总体状况的评估评分,且安全且耐受性良好。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验