Wymer James P, Simpson Jeffrey, Sen David, Bongardt Sabine
Upstate Clinical Research, Albany, NY 12205, USA.
Clin J Pain. 2009 Jun;25(5):376-85. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e318196d2b6.
The aims of this multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial were to confirm the efficacy of lacosamide at a daily dose of 400 mg/d and to explore the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of lacosamide 200 mg/d and 600 mg/d in the treatment of painful diabetic neuropathy.
The trial consisted of a 2-week run-in period, a 6-week titration phase, and a 12-week maintenance phase, during which patients received placebo or fixed doses of lacosamide 200, 400, or 600 mg/d. No back titration was allowed during the trial. The primary efficacy criterion was the change in Likert pain score from baseline to the average over the last 4 weeks of the maintenance phase in the intent-to-treat population.
The lacosamide 400 mg/d group demonstrated statistically significant improvement in Likert pain score over placebo for the primary efficacy measure. At the end of treatment, 58% of patients in the lacosamide 400 mg/d treatment group achieved at least a 2-point or 30% reduction in Likert pain score, compared with 46% of placebo-treated patients. The lacosamide 200 mg/d group separated from placebo, but failed to show statistical significance for any of the primary or secondary outcome measures. The lacosamide 600 mg/d group was significantly more efficacious than placebo in the observed cases but not in the intent-to-treat population. This was probably secondary to a relatively high-premature withdrawal rate due to adverse events that occurred during the titration phase in that group. Overall lacosamide at daily doses of 200 to 400 mg was well tolerated, with 8% of patients discontinuing due to an adverse event from the 200 mg/d group and 23% from the 400 mg/d group compared with 9% in the placebo group. Discontinuations due to adverse events were highest in the 600 mg/d group (40%). The most common adverse events consisted of dizziness, nausea, tremor, headache, and fatigue. Somnolence, cognitive and behavioral side effects, weight change, and edema were notably low.
Safety and efficacy analyses indicated that lacosamide 400 mg/d provided an optimal balance between efficacy and side effects in patients with painful diabetic neuropathy.
本多中心、随机、安慰剂对照、双盲试验的目的是确认每日剂量400mg的拉科酰胺的疗效,并探索每日剂量200mg和600mg的拉科酰胺在治疗疼痛性糖尿病神经病变中的疗效、安全性和耐受性。
试验包括2周的导入期、6周的滴定阶段和12周的维持阶段,在此期间患者接受安慰剂或固定剂量的每日200、400或600mg的拉科酰胺。试验期间不允许反向滴定。主要疗效标准是意向性治疗人群中从基线到维持阶段最后4周平均水平的李克特疼痛评分变化。
对于主要疗效指标,每日400mg拉科酰胺组的李克特疼痛评分相对于安慰剂有统计学上的显著改善。治疗结束时,每日400mg拉科酰胺治疗组中58%的患者李克特疼痛评分至少降低2分或30%,而安慰剂治疗组为46%。每日200mg拉科酰胺组与安慰剂组有差异,但在任何主要或次要结局指标上均未显示出统计学意义。在观察病例中,每日600mg拉科酰胺组比安慰剂组显著更有效,但在意向性治疗人群中并非如此。这可能是由于该组在滴定阶段因不良事件导致相对较高的提前退出率。总体而言,每日剂量200至400mg的拉科酰胺耐受性良好,每日200mg组有8%的患者因不良事件停药,每日400mg组为23%,而安慰剂组为9%。因不良事件停药在每日600mg组最高(40%)。最常见的不良事件包括头晕、恶心、震颤、头痛和疲劳。嗜睡、认知和行为副作用、体重变化和水肿明显较少。
安全性和疗效分析表明,每日400mg的拉科酰胺在疼痛性糖尿病神经病变患者的疗效和副作用之间提供了最佳平衡。