• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

健康和健康差异的分级和报告。

Grading and reporting health and health disparities.

机构信息

University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI 53726, USA.

出版信息

Prev Chronic Dis. 2010 Jan;7(1):A16. Epub 2009 Dec 15.

PMID:20040231
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2811511/
Abstract

Report cards are widely used in health for drawing attention to performance indicators. We developed a state health report card with separate grades for health and health disparities to generate interest in and awareness of differences in health across different population subgroups and to identify opportunities to improve health. We established grading curves from data for all 50 states for 2 outcomes (mortality and unhealthy days) and 4 life stages (infants, children and young adults, working-age adults, and older adults). We assigned grades for health within each life stage by sex, race/ethnicity, socioeconomics, and geography. We also assigned a health disparity grade to each life stage. Report cards can simplify complex information for lay audiences and garner media and policy maker attention. However, their development requires methodologic and value choices that may limit their interpretation.

摘要

报告卡广泛应用于健康领域,以引起对绩效指标的关注。我们开发了一份州健康报告卡,为健康和健康差距分别评分,以引起人们对不同人群亚组之间健康差异的兴趣和认识,并确定改善健康的机会。我们根据所有 50 个州的两个结果(死亡率和不健康天数)和四个生命阶段(婴儿、儿童和年轻人、工作年龄成年人和老年人)的数据建立了评分曲线。我们按性别、种族/族裔、社会经济和地理位置为每个生命阶段的健康分配等级。我们还为每个生命阶段分配了一个健康差距等级。报告卡可以为非专业观众简化复杂的信息,并引起媒体和政策制定者的关注。然而,它们的发展需要方法学和价值观的选择,这可能限制它们的解释。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4576/2811511/b32b86e8b7d4/PCD71A16s03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4576/2811511/b32b86e8b7d4/PCD71A16s03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4576/2811511/b32b86e8b7d4/PCD71A16s03.jpg

相似文献

1
Grading and reporting health and health disparities.健康和健康差异的分级和报告。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2010 Jan;7(1):A16. Epub 2009 Dec 15.
2
Health-related quality of life surveillance--United States, 1993-2002.1993 - 2002年美国与健康相关的生活质量监测
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2005 Oct 28;54(4):1-35.
3
Core state preconception health indicators - pregnancy risk assessment monitoring system and behavioral risk factor surveillance system, 2009.核心孕前健康指标 - 妊娠风险评估监测系统和行为危险因素监测系统,2009 年。
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2014 Apr 25;63(3):1-62.
4
Racial/ethnic and socioeconomic disparities in health-related quality of life among people with coronary heart disease, 2007.2007 年,冠心病患者健康相关生活质量的种族/民族和社会经济差异。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2011 Jul;8(4):A78. Epub 2011 Jun 15.
5
Surveillance for disparities in maternal health-related behaviors--selected states, Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS), 2000-2001.孕产妇健康相关行为差异监测——部分州,妊娠风险评估监测系统(PRAMS),2000 - 2001年
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2004 Jul 2;53(4):1-13.
6
CDC National Health Report: leading causes of morbidity and mortality and associated behavioral risk and protective factors--United States, 2005-2013.美国疾病控制与预防中心国家健康报告:2005 - 2013年美国发病和死亡的主要原因以及相关行为风险和保护因素
MMWR Suppl. 2014 Oct 31;63(4):3-27.
7
Awareness of racial and socioeconomic health disparities in the United States: the national opinion survey on health and health disparities, 2008-2009.美国对种族和社会经济健康差异的认识:2008-2009 年全国健康和健康差异意见调查。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2011 Jul;8(4):A73. Epub 2011 Jun 15.
8
The health status of southern children: a neglected regional disparity.南方儿童的健康状况:一个被忽视的地区差异。
Pediatrics. 2005 Dec;116(6):e746-53. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-0366. Epub 2005 Nov 1.
9
Asthma Surveillance - United States, 2006-2018.哮喘监测 - 美国,2006-2018 年。
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2021 Sep 17;70(5):1-32. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss7005a1.
10
Differences in healthy life expectancy for the US population by sex, race/ethnicity and geographic region: 2008.2008年美国不同性别、种族/族裔和地理区域人群的健康预期寿命差异
J Public Health (Oxf). 2015 Sep;37(3):470-9. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdu059. Epub 2014 Aug 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Discounting Health Grades for Disparity: The 2021 Wisconsin Population Health and Equity Report Card.忽视健康等级差异:2021 年威斯康星州人口健康与公平报告卡。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2023 Apr 6;20:E23. doi: 10.5888/pcd20.220301.
2
Availability and Accuracy of EMS Information about Chronic Health and Medications in Cardiac Arrest.院外心脏骤停时急救医疗服务(EMS)关于慢性健康状况和用药信息的可得性与准确性
West J Emerg Med. 2017 Aug;18(5):864-869. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2017.5.33198. Epub 2017 Jul 14.
3
Population health and the academic medical center: the time is right.

本文引用的文献

1
Improving population health and reducing health care disparities.改善人群健康状况并减少医疗保健差距。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2007 Sep-Oct;26(5):1281-92. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.26.5.1281.
2
Methodological issues in measuring health disparities.衡量健康差异中的方法学问题。
Vital Health Stat 2. 2005 Jul(141):1-16.
3
Explaining the differences in income-related health inequalities across European countries.解释欧洲各国与收入相关的健康不平等现象的差异。
人口健康与学术医疗中心:时机已到。
Acad Med. 2014 Apr;89(4):544-9. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000171.
4
Summarizing social disparities in health.总结健康方面的社会差异。
Milbank Q. 2013 Mar;91(1):5-36. doi: 10.1111/milq.12001.
5
Health inequalities: trends, progress, and policy.健康不平等:趋势、进展与政策。
Annu Rev Public Health. 2012 Apr;33:7-40. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031811-124658. Epub 2012 Jan 6.
6
A summary measure of health inequalities for a pay-for-population health performance system.用于按人头付费的卫生绩效系统的健康不平等综合衡量指标。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2010 Jul;7(4):A72. Epub 2010 Jun 15.
Health Econ. 2004 Jul;13(7):609-28. doi: 10.1002/hec.918.
4
Trends in racial and ethnic-specific rates for the health status indicators: United States, 1990-98.1990 - 1998年美国特定种族和族裔健康状况指标的变化趋势。
Healthy People 2000 Stat Notes. 2002 Jan(23):1-16.
5
Creating a community report card: the San Diego experience.创建社区成绩单:圣地亚哥的经验。
Am J Public Health. 2000 Jun;90(6):880-2. doi: 10.2105/ajph.90.6.880.
6
Community health report cards. Results of a national survey.
Am J Prev Med. 1999 Jul;17(1):79-86. doi: 10.1016/s0749-3797(99)00033-1.
7
Finding audiences, changing beliefs: the structure of research use in Canadian health policy.寻找受众,改变观念:加拿大卫生政策中研究应用的结构
J Health Polit Policy Law. 1990 Fall;15(3):525-42. doi: 10.1215/03616878-15-3-525.