• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Community health report cards. Results of a national survey.

作者信息

Fielding J E, Sutherland C E, Halfon N

机构信息

Department of Health Services, School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles 90095-1772, USA.

出版信息

Am J Prev Med. 1999 Jul;17(1):79-86. doi: 10.1016/s0749-3797(99)00033-1.

DOI:10.1016/s0749-3797(99)00033-1
PMID:10429757
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this research is to examine the state-of-the-art in community health report card development and use in order to increase their effective integration into community health improvement efforts.

METHODS

A mailed survey was sent to 115 "report card" communities nationwide. This list was generated through multiple key informants at the national, regional, and state levels. Seventy-four percent (85/115) were eligible for the study. The report cards returned were inventoried for: quality of their data, comprehensiveness, presentation, appropriateness to target audiences, purpose and sponsorship, relevance to policy development, community involvement, comparability, replicability, and other factors.

RESULTS

Of the 85 eligible projects, 65 responded. The report cards varied significantly in all areas. Only one half of communities used pre-existing formats or the experience of others to guide this resource-intensive development process. Data collection was the greatest challenge encountered in development. Local health departments, hospitals, and non-profit civic groups were the community groups most likely to be involved in development.

CONCLUSION

There is need for infrastructure, technical assistance, and improved, easy-to-use tools to facilitate the report card development process and the sharing of expertise and experience among involved communities. Greater systematization of the process would enhance the reasonableness and sustainability of the effort. Broad community involvement, including support of the local health department, other community agencies, as well as the local business community, may be key to their success.

摘要

相似文献

1
Community health report cards. Results of a national survey.
Am J Prev Med. 1999 Jul;17(1):79-86. doi: 10.1016/s0749-3797(99)00033-1.
2
The role of public health in population health.公共卫生在人群健康中的作用。
Physician Exec. 1997 Sep-Oct;23(7):25-9.
3
A community health report card: comprehensive assessment for tracking community health (CATCH).
Best Pract Benchmarking Healthc. 1997 Sep-Oct;2(5):196-207.
4
Improving community health status: strategies for success.改善社区健康状况:成功策略
Qual Lett Healthc Lead. 1996 Feb;8(1):2-12.
5
NC-CATCH: North Carolina Comprehensive Assessment for Tracking Community Health.北卡罗来纳州社区健康追踪综合评估
N C Med J. 2008 Mar-Apr;69(2):122-6.
6
The future of community coalition building.社区联盟建设的未来。
Am J Community Psychol. 2001 Apr;29(2):263-8. doi: 10.1023/A:1010330730421.
7
The city government's role in community health improvement.市政府在改善社区健康方面的作用。
Public Health Rep. 2000 Mar-Jun;115(2-3):216-21.
8
Community coalition building--contemporary practice and research: introduction.社区联盟建设——当代实践与研究:引言
Am J Community Psychol. 2001 Apr;29(2):165-72; discussion 205-11. doi: 10.1023/A:1010314326787.
9
America's communities movement: investing in the civic landscape.美国社区运动:投资公民环境。
Am J Community Psychol. 2001 Apr;29(2):301-7. doi: 10.1023/A:1010391016309.
10
Initiatives of 11 rural Appalachian cancer coalitions in Pennsylvania and New York.宾夕法尼亚州和纽约州11个阿巴拉契亚农村癌症联盟的倡议。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2006 Oct;3(4):A122. Epub 2006 Sep 15.

引用本文的文献

1
NC CATCH: Advancing Public Health Analytics.北卡罗来纳州公共卫生分析与转化中心:推动公共卫生分析发展。
Online J Public Health Inform. 2010;2(3). doi: 10.5210/ojphi.v2i3.3348. Epub 2010 Dec 23.
2
Grading and reporting health and health disparities.健康和健康差异的分级和报告。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2010 Jan;7(1):A16. Epub 2009 Dec 15.
3
Use of peer groupings to assess county public health status.使用同侪分组来评估县公共卫生状况。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2008 Jul;5(3):A93. Epub 2008 Jun 15.
4
Starting school healthy and ready to learn: using social indicators to improve school readiness in Los Angeles County.健康入学并做好学习准备:利用社会指标提升洛杉矶县的入学准备情况
Prev Chronic Dis. 2007 Oct;4(4):A106. Epub 2007 Sep 15.
5
Using routine comparative data to assess the quality of health care: understanding and avoiding common pitfalls.利用常规比较数据评估医疗保健质量:理解并避免常见陷阱。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2003 Apr;12(2):122-8. doi: 10.1136/qhc.12.2.122.
6
Meeting the data needs of a local health department: the Los Angeles County Health Survey.满足当地卫生部门的数据需求:洛杉矶县健康调查。
Am J Public Health. 2001 Dec;91(12):1950-2. doi: 10.2105/ajph.91.12.1950.
7
Creating a community report card: the San Diego experience.创建社区成绩单:圣地亚哥的经验。
Am J Public Health. 2000 Jun;90(6):880-2. doi: 10.2105/ajph.90.6.880.