Histopathology Department, Dubai Hospital, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2010 Jan;14(1):22-8. doi: 10.1097/LGT.0b013e3181ab4584.
To investigate the possibility of the occurrence of errors in the interpretation of cervical smears in the presence of lubricant, mucus and other contaminant particles in ThinPrep (TP) technique (Cytyc Corp., Boxborough, MA) liquid-based cervical cytology.
Four thousands sixty-eight TP cervical smears were reviewed over a 12-month period. Those cases that initially had caused interpretation errors in which lubricant, mucus, and other contaminant materials were confused with infectious agents or epithelial abnormalities among the primary screening cytotechnologists and pathologists were selected for our study. These cases were retrieved from the cytology unit's registered logbook. The possibility of these detected lubricant, mucus, and other contaminant materials in these cases to cause misinterpretation for randomly selected pathologists and cytotechnologists who were blinded for the study was further investigated. Three cytotechnologists and 2 pathologists were independently asked to give their opinions on each case without their prior knowledge of the selected cases.
Only 15 cases out of 4068 were found to cause interpretation errors. Five different contaminant patterns were detected. The main potential misinterpretations included secondary diagnosis that is confused mainly with infectious agents. However, other contaminants were even misinterpreted as high-grade squamous epithelial abnormalities.
This study illustrates the potential of lubricant, mucus, and foreign body contaminant materials to cause interpretation errors in TP cervical cytology. Although liquid-based preparation reduces the obscuring effect of these materials, the unusual appearance of some of these particles in TP cervical smears not only can mimic infectious microorganisms, but also squamous dyskaryosis. This can lead to serious interpretation errors for the inexperienced cytotechnologists and pathologists, which subsequently can have an effect on the women's management.
探讨在 ThinPrep(TP)技术(Cytyc 公司,马萨诸塞州 Boxborough)液基细胞学检查中存在润滑剂、黏液和其他污染物颗粒时,对巴氏涂片判读出现错误的可能性。
在 12 个月的时间内,共复查了 4068 例 TP 宫颈涂片。选择了最初在初级筛查细胞技术人员和病理学家中因润滑剂、黏液和其他污染物与感染因子或上皮异常混淆而导致判读错误的病例进行研究。这些病例是从细胞学检查室的登记日志中检索出来的。进一步调查了这些检测到的润滑剂、黏液和其他污染物在随机选择的病理学家和细胞技术人员中是否有可能导致误诊,这些病理学家和细胞技术人员对研究是盲法的。三名细胞技术人员和两名病理学家被要求独立地对每一个病例发表意见,而他们事先并不知道所选病例。
在 4068 例中仅发现 15 例导致判读错误。共发现 5 种不同的污染物模式。主要的潜在误诊包括与感染因子混淆的次要诊断。然而,其他污染物甚至被误诊为高级别鳞状上皮异常。
本研究说明了润滑剂、黏液和异物污染物在 TP 宫颈细胞学检查中可能导致判读错误。虽然液基制片减少了这些物质的模糊效应,但这些物质在 TP 宫颈涂片上的异常表现不仅可以模拟感染性微生物,还可以模拟鳞状细胞不典型增生。这可能导致经验不足的细胞技术人员和病理学家出现严重的判读错误,进而对女性的管理产生影响。