Western Australian Institute for Medical Research, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia 6012, Australia.
J Environ Public Health. 2009;2009:957023. doi: 10.1155/2009/957023. Epub 2009 Oct 15.
Assessing occupational exposure in retrospective community-based case-control studies is difficult as measured exposure data are very seldom available. The expert assessment method is considered the most accurate way to attribute exposure but it is a time consuming and expensive process and may be seen as subjective, nonreproducible, and nontransparent. In this paper, we describe these problems and outline our solutions as operationalized in a web-based software application (OccIDEAS). The novel aspects of OccIDEAS are combining all steps in the assessment into one software package; enmeshing the process of assessment into the development of questionnaires; selecting the exposure(s) of interest; specifying rules for exposure assignment; allowing manual or automatic assessments; ensuring that circumstances in which exposure is possible for an individual are highlighted for review; providing reports to ensure consistency of assessment. Development of this application has the potential to make high-quality occupational assessment more efficient and accessible for epidemiological studies.
在回顾性基于社区的病例对照研究中评估职业暴露是困难的,因为很少有测量的暴露数据可用。专家评估方法被认为是归因于暴露的最准确方法,但它是一个耗时且昂贵的过程,并且可能被视为主观、不可复制和不透明的。在本文中,我们描述了这些问题,并概述了我们在基于网络的软件应用程序(OccIDEAS)中的解决方案。OccIDEAS 的新颖之处在于将评估的所有步骤组合到一个软件包中;将评估过程嵌入到问卷的开发中;选择感兴趣的暴露(s);指定暴露分配规则;允许手动或自动评估;确保突出显示个体可能存在暴露的情况以供审查;提供报告以确保评估的一致性。该应用程序的开发有可能使高质量的职业评估更有效和更容易为流行病学研究所采用。