Surgical Emergency and Trauma Department, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Pavillon G visceral, 5 place d'Arsonval, 69437, Lyon Cedex 03, France.
World J Surg. 2010 Feb;34(2):210-5. doi: 10.1007/s00268-009-0349-z.
The clinical diagnosis of acute appendicitis in adults remains tricky, but radiological examinations are very helpful to determine the diagnosis even when the adult patient presents atypically. This study was designed to quantify the proportion of patients with a preoperative diagnosis of acute appendicitis that had isolated right lower quadrant pain without biological inflammatory signs and then to determine which imaging examination led to the determination of the diagnosis.
In this monocentric study based on retrospectively collected data, we analyzed a series of 326 patients with a preoperative diagnosis of acute appendicitis and isolated those who were afebrile and had isolated right lower quadrant pain and normal white blood cell counts and C-reactive protein levels. We determined whether the systematic ultrasonography examination was informative enough or a complementary intravenous contrast media computed tomography scan was necessary to determine the diagnosis, and whether the final pathological diagnosis fit the preoperative one.
A total of 15.6% of the patients with a preoperative diagnosis of acute appendicitis had isolated rebound tenderness in the right lower quadrant, i.e., they were afebrile and their white blood cell counts and C-reactive protein levels were normal. In 96.1% of the cases, the ultrasonography examination, sometimes complemented by an intravenous contrasted computed tomography scan if the ultrasonography result was equivocal, fit the histopathological diagnosis of acute appendicitis.
The diagnosis of acute appendicitis cannot be excluded when an adult patient presents with isolated rebound tenderness in the right lower quadrant even without fever and biological inflammatory signs. In our study, ultrasonography and computed tomography were very helpful when making the final diagnosis.
成人急性阑尾炎的临床诊断仍然具有挑战性,但影像学检查对于确定诊断非常有帮助,即使成人患者表现不典型。本研究旨在定量分析术前诊断为急性阑尾炎的患者中,有多少例出现单纯右下腹痛而无生物学炎症迹象,然后确定哪种影像学检查有助于确定诊断。
本研究为基于回顾性收集数据的单中心研究,我们分析了一系列 326 例术前诊断为急性阑尾炎的患者,从中分离出那些无发热、单纯右下腹痛、白细胞计数和 C 反应蛋白水平正常的患者。我们确定系统超声检查是否足够有信息,或者是否需要补充静脉对比剂计算机断层扫描来确定诊断,以及最终的病理诊断是否符合术前诊断。
术前诊断为急性阑尾炎的患者中,有 15.6%的患者出现单纯右下象限反跳痛,即无发热,白细胞计数和 C 反应蛋白水平正常。在 96.1%的情况下,超声检查,在超声结果不确定时,有时补充静脉对比剂计算机断层扫描,符合急性阑尾炎的组织病理学诊断。
当成年患者出现单纯右下象限反跳痛,即使无发热和生物学炎症迹象,也不能排除急性阑尾炎的诊断。在我们的研究中,超声检查和计算机断层扫描在做出最终诊断时非常有帮助。