School of Public Health, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 35 blok d, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Implement Sci. 2009 Dec 30;4:82. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-4-82.
Electronic guideline-based decision support systems have been suggested to successfully deliver the knowledge embedded in clinical practice guidelines. A number of studies have already shown positive findings for decision support systems such as drug-dosing systems and computer-generated reminder systems for preventive care services.
A systematic literature search (1990 to December 2008) of the English literature indexed in the Medline database, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and CRD (DARE, HTA and NHS EED databases) was conducted to identify evaluation studies of electronic multi-step guideline implementation systems in ambulatory care settings. Important inclusion criterions were the multidimensionality of the guideline (the guideline needed to consist of several aspects or steps) and real-time interaction with the system during consultation. Clinical decision support systems such as one-time reminders for preventive care for which positive findings were shown in earlier reviews were excluded. Two comparisons were considered: electronic multidimensional guidelines versus usual care (comparison one) and electronic multidimensional guidelines versus other guideline implementation methods (comparison two).
Twenty-seven publications were selected for analysis in this systematic review. Most designs were cluster randomized controlled trials investigating process outcomes more than patient outcomes. With success defined as at least 50% of the outcome variables being significant, none of the studies were successful in improving patient outcomes. Only seven of seventeen studies that investigated process outcomes showed improvements in process of care variables compared with the usual care group (comparison one). No incremental effect of the electronic implementation over the distribution of paper versions of the guideline was found, neither for the patient outcomes nor for the process outcomes (comparison two).
There is little evidence at the moment for the effectiveness of an increasingly used and commercialized instrument such as electronic multidimensional guidelines. After more than a decade of development of numerous electronic systems, research on the most effective implementation strategy for this kind of guideline-based decision support systems is still lacking. This conclusion implies a considerable risk towards inappropriate investments in ineffective implementation interventions and in suboptimal care.
电子循证决策支持系统已被建议成功传递临床实践指南中所嵌入的知识。许多研究已经显示出针对药物剂量系统和计算机生成的预防保健服务提醒系统等决策支持系统的积极结果。
对 Medline 数据库、Embase、Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库和 CRD(DARE、HTA 和 NHS EED 数据库)中 1990 年至 2008 年 12 月期间的英文文献进行系统的文献检索,以确定在门诊环境中评估电子多步骤指南实施系统的评价研究。重要的纳入标准是指南的多维性(指南需要由几个方面或步骤组成)和咨询过程中与系统的实时交互。排除了在早期综述中显示出积极结果的临床决策支持系统,如单次提醒预防保健。考虑了两种比较:电子多维指南与常规护理(比较一)和电子多维指南与其他指南实施方法(比较二)。
本系统评价分析了 27 篇出版物。大多数设计都是调查过程结果而不是患者结果的集群随机对照试验。以至少 50%的结果变量具有统计学意义为成功定义,没有一项研究成功改善了患者的结局。在与常规护理组比较时,只有 17 项研究中有 7 项研究显示出对护理过程变量的改善(比较一)。在患者结局和过程结局方面,电子实施并没有比指南纸质版本的分发产生增量效果(比较二)。
目前几乎没有证据表明电子多维指南这种日益被使用和商业化的工具的有效性。在开发了众多电子系统十多年后,对于这种基于指南的决策支持系统最有效的实施策略的研究仍然缺乏。这一结论意味着在无效实施干预措施和次优护理方面的不当投资存在相当大的风险。