Suppr超能文献

意大利献血者全国调查:梅毒检测的外部质量评估(EQA)。

Italian national survey of blood donors: external quality assessment (EQA) of syphilis testing.

机构信息

Section of Transfusion Methodologies, Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Molecular Medicine, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

J Clin Microbiol. 2010 Mar;48(3):753-7. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01460-09. Epub 2009 Dec 30.

Abstract

The detection of syphilis among blood donors may reveal high-risk sexual behavior, which can go unreported at the time of donor selection and compromise the safety of the donated blood. In Italy, blood is collected, tested, and distributed by transfusion services (TSs), which also perform outpatient transfusions. Although the TSs must screen for syphilis by law, there are no indications of the specific type of method to be used, generating discrepancies in the results obtained by the different TSs. To determine the proficiency of the TSs in screening for syphilis, we performed an external quality assessment (EQA). The EQA was based on two shipments of serum panels; 133 and 118 of the 326 existing TSs participated in the first and second shipments, respectively. Each panel consisted of both positive and negative serum samples. The results confirmed that the use of a single nontreponemal test (the Venereal Disease Research Laboratory [VDRL] and the rapid plasma reagin [RPR] tests) is the least sensitive means of identifying samples that are positive for syphilis antibodies. We also found that the interpretation of the results of manual techniques, such as the RPR test, the VDRL test, the Treponema pallidum hemagglutination (TPHA) assay, and the T. pallidum particle agglutination (TPPA) assay, can vary greatly among different TSs and operators. Total Ig enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) are the most sensitive. However, the determination of syphilis on the basis of the results of a single test is not sufficient for an accurate screening; and all blood units should thus be assessed by two distinct treponemal tests, that is, a total Ig EIA and the TPHA or the TPPA assay.

摘要

献血者梅毒检测可揭示高危性行为,这些行为在献血者选择时可能未被报告,从而危及献血安全性。在意大利,血液采集、检测和分发由输血服务机构(TS)完成,这些机构也进行门诊输血。尽管 TS 必须依法筛查梅毒,但并未指明具体使用哪种方法,导致不同 TS 获得的结果存在差异。为确定 TS 梅毒筛查的能力,我们进行了外部质量评估(EQA)。EQA 基于两批血清板;326 个 TS 中有 133 个和 118 个分别参加了第一批和第二批发货。每个板都包含阳性和阴性血清样本。结果证实,使用单个非梅毒螺旋体试验(性病研究实验室[VDRL]和快速血浆反应素[RPR]试验)是识别梅毒抗体阳性样本最不敏感的方法。我们还发现,对 RPR 试验、VDRL 试验、梅毒螺旋体血凝(TPHA)试验和梅毒螺旋体颗粒凝集(TPPA)试验等手动技术结果的解释在不同的 TS 和操作人员之间存在很大差异。总 Ig 酶免疫测定(EIAs)最敏感。然而,仅基于单个检测结果进行梅毒筛查是不够的,因此所有血液单位都应通过两种不同的梅毒螺旋体检测进行评估,即总 Ig EIA 和 TPHA 或 TPPA 检测。

相似文献

1
Italian national survey of blood donors: external quality assessment (EQA) of syphilis testing.
J Clin Microbiol. 2010 Mar;48(3):753-7. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01460-09. Epub 2009 Dec 30.
4

引用本文的文献

1
Efforts in blood safety: Integrated approach for serological diagnosis of syphilis.
Asian J Transfus Sci. 2016 Jan-Jun;10(1):22-30. doi: 10.4103/0973-6247.164267.

本文引用的文献

1
Nucleic acid testing (NAT) for HCV RNA in Italian transfusion centres: an external quality assessment.
J Clin Virol. 2008 Apr;41(4):277-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2008.01.008. Epub 2008 Mar 5.
2
Increase in recently acquired syphilis infections in English, Welsh and Northern Irish blood donors.
Vox Sang. 2007 Jul;93(1):19-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1423-0410.2007.00923.x.
3
Sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines, 2006.
MMWR Recomm Rep. 2006 Aug 4;55(RR-11):1-94.
6
Update on syphilis: resurgence of an old problem.
JAMA. 2003 Sep 17;290(11):1510-4. doi: 10.1001/jama.290.11.1510.
7
Guidelines for serological testing for syphilis.
Sex Transm Infect. 2000 Oct;76(5):403-5. doi: 10.1136/sti.76.5.403.
8
9
Syphilis: review with emphasis on clinical, epidemiologic, and some biologic features.
Clin Microbiol Rev. 1999 Apr;12(2):187-209. doi: 10.1128/CMR.12.2.187.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验