Maple P A C, Ratcliffe D, Smit E
Health Protection Agency—Birmingham, West Midlands Public Health Laboratory, Heart of England Foundation Trust, Bordesley Green East, Birmingham B9 5SS, United Kingdom.
Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2010 Nov;17(11):1718-22. doi: 10.1128/CVI.00102-10. Epub 2010 Sep 15.
Following a laboratory audit, a significant number of Treponema pallidum particle agglutination assay (TPPA)-negative sera were identified when TPPA was used as a confirmatory assay of syphilis enzyme immunoassay (EIA) screening-reactive sera (SSRS). Sera giving such discrepant results were further characterized to assess their significance. A panel of 226 sera was tested by the Abbott Murex ICE Syphilis EIA and then by the Newmarket Syphilis EIA II. TPPA testing was performed on 223 sera. Further testing by the Venereal Disease Research Laboratory (VDRL) test, the Mercia Syphilis IgM EIA, the fluorescent treponemal antibody (FTA-ABS) assay, and INNO-LIA immunoblotting was undertaken in discrepant cases. One hundred eighty-seven of 223 (83.8%) SSRS were TPPA reactive, while 26 (11.6%) sera which were reactive in both the ICE and Newmarket EIAs were nonreactive by TPPA. The majority (68%) of the TPPA-discrepant sera were from HIV-positive patients and did not represent early acute cases, based on previous or follow-up samples, which were available for 22/26 samples. FTA-ABS testing was performed on 24 of these sera; 14 (58.3%) were FTA-ABS positive, and 10 (41.7%) were FTA-ABS negative. Twenty-one of these 26 sera were tested by INNO-LIA, and an additional 4 FTA-ABS-negative samples were positive. In this study, significant numbers (18/26) of SSRS- and TPPA-negative sera were shown by further FTA-ABS and LIA (line immunoblot assay) testing to be positive. The reason why certain sera are negative by TPPA but reactive by treponemal EIA and other syphilis confirmatory assays is not clear, and these initial findings should be further explored.
在一次实验室审核中,当梅毒螺旋体颗粒凝集试验(TPPA)用作梅毒酶免疫测定(EIA)筛查反应性血清(SSRS)的确认试验时,发现大量TPPA阴性血清。对给出此类不一致结果的血清进行了进一步特征分析以评估其意义。用雅培Murex ICE梅毒EIA检测了一组226份血清,然后用纽马克特梅毒EIA II进行检测。对223份血清进行了TPPA检测。对不一致的病例进一步采用性病研究实验室(VDRL)试验、默西亚梅毒IgM EIA、荧光密螺旋体抗体(FTA-ABS)试验和INNO-LIA免疫印迹法进行检测。223份SSRS中有187份(83.8%)TPPA反应性阳性,而在ICE和纽马克特EIA中均反应性阳性的26份(11.6%)血清TPPA反应性阴性。根据之前或后续样本(22/26份样本可获得),大多数(68%)TPPA不一致血清来自HIV阳性患者,且不代表早期急性病例。对其中24份血清进行了FTA-ABS检测;14份(58.3%)FTA-ABS阳性,10份(41.7%)FTA-ABS阴性。对这26份血清中的21份进行了INNO-LIA检测,另外4份FTA-ABS阴性样本呈阳性。在本研究中,通过进一步的FTA-ABS和LIA(线性免疫印迹法)检测显示,大量(18/26)SSRS且TPPA阴性的血清呈阳性。某些血清TPPA阴性但密螺旋体EIA和其他梅毒确认试验反应性阳性的原因尚不清楚,这些初步发现应进一步探索。