• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

同伴评估对医学生专业发展的影响:一项定性研究。

Impact of peer assessment on the professional development of medical students: a qualitative study.

机构信息

Department of Family Medicine, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York 14642, USA.

出版信息

Acad Med. 2010 Jan;85(1):140-7. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181c47a5b.

DOI:10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181c47a5b
PMID:20042840
Abstract

PURPOSE

Peer assessment can predict future academic performance and provide medical students with reliable feedback about professionalism. It is unclear whether peer assessment fosters personal growth or transformations in attitudes or behaviors. The authors investigated what types of peer feedback students remember and what reactions or transformations students experience as a result of peer assessment.

METHOD

In May 2005, the authors invited medical students from the second-year (n = 101) and fourth-year (n = 83) classes to provide narratives about how peer assessment affected their personal and professional development. All students had participated in peer assessment during required, formative comprehensive assessments. The authors analyzed responses using mixed qualitative-quantitative methods.

RESULTS

The 138 responses represented 82% and 69% of students from the fourth-year and second-year classes, respectively. Students recalled peer assessment content about both positive (e.g., teaching skills) and negative (e.g., overconfidence) qualities. Both positive (e.g., appreciation) and negative (e.g., anger) emotional reactions were reported. Many (67%) found peer assessment helpful, reassuring, or confirming of something they knew; 65% reported important transformations in awareness, attitudes, or behaviors because of peer assessment. Change was more likely when feedback was specific and described an area for improvement. Wholly negative responses to the peer assessment process were rare.

CONCLUSIONS

Peer assessment can be a powerful tool to assess and encourage formation of professional behaviors, particularly the interpersonal dimensions. Participants should receive training to provide specific, constructive feedback. The institutional culture should emphasize safety around feedback, while committing to rewarding excellence and addressing concerning behaviors.

摘要

目的

同伴评估可以预测未来的学业表现,并为医学生提供关于专业精神的可靠反馈。目前尚不清楚同伴评估是否有助于个人成长或态度或行为的转变。作者调查了学生记住了哪些类型的同伴反馈,以及学生由于同伴评估而经历了哪些反应或转变。

方法

2005 年 5 月,作者邀请了来自二年级(n=101)和四年级(n=83)的医学生提供叙述,说明同伴评估如何影响他们的个人和专业发展。所有学生都在必修的形成性综合评估中参与了同伴评估。作者使用混合定性-定量方法分析了回复。

结果

138 份回复分别代表了四年级和二年级学生的 82%和 69%。学生回忆起同伴评估内容包括积极的(例如,教学技能)和消极的(例如,过于自信)品质。报告了积极的(例如,感激)和消极的(例如,愤怒)情绪反应。许多人(67%)认为同伴评估很有帮助、令人安心或证实了他们所知道的某些事情;65%的人表示,由于同伴评估,他们的意识、态度或行为发生了重要转变。当反馈具体并描述了一个需要改进的领域时,转变更有可能发生。对同伴评估过程的完全负面反应很少见。

结论

同伴评估可以成为评估和鼓励形成专业行为的有力工具,特别是在人际交往方面。参与者应该接受培训以提供具体、建设性的反馈。机构文化应强调反馈的安全性,同时承诺奖励卓越表现并解决令人担忧的行为。

相似文献

1
Impact of peer assessment on the professional development of medical students: a qualitative study.同伴评估对医学生专业发展的影响:一项定性研究。
Acad Med. 2010 Jan;85(1):140-7. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181c47a5b.
2
Can there be a single system for peer assessment of professionalism among medical students? A multi-institutional study.能否建立一个针对医学生职业素养的同行评估单一系统?一项多机构研究。
Acad Med. 2007 Jun;82(6):578-86. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3180555d4e.
3
An analysis of peer, self, and tutor assessment in problem-based learning tutorials.基于问题的学习辅导中同伴、自我和导师评估的分析。
Med Teach. 2007 Jun;29(5):e122-32. doi: 10.1080/01421590701294323.
4
Peer assessment in problem-based learning: a qualitative study.基于问题的学习中的同伴评估:一项定性研究。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2007 May;12(2):169-86. doi: 10.1007/s10459-005-5046-6. Epub 2006 Oct 28.
5
Effects of rater selection on peer assessment among medical students.评分者选择对医学生同伴评估的影响。
Med Educ. 2006 Nov;40(11):1088-97. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02613.x.
6
Methods to assess students' acquisition, application and integration of basic science knowledge in an innovative competency-based curriculum.在基于创新能力的课程中评估学生对基础科学知识的掌握、应用和整合的方法。
Med Teach. 2008;30(7):e171-7. doi: 10.1080/01421590802139740.
7
Lessons learned from a study-group pilot program for medical students perceived to be 'at risk'.从一项针对被认为“有风险”的医学生的学习小组试点项目中吸取的经验教训。
Med Teach. 2007 Mar;29(2-3):e37-40. doi: 10.1080/01421590601034688.
8
Maximizing the value of feedback for individual facilitator and faculty development in a problem-based learning curriculum.在基于问题的学习课程中,最大化反馈对个体促进者和教师发展的价值。
Med Teach. 2007 Feb;29(1):e26-31. doi: 10.1080/01421590601032435.
9
Helping each other to learn--a process evaluation of peer assisted learning.相互帮助学习——同伴辅助学习的过程评估
BMC Med Educ. 2006 Mar 8;6:18. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-6-18.
10
Strengthening public health medicine training for medical students: development and evaluation of a lifestyle curriculum.加强医学生的公共卫生医学培训:生活方式课程的开发与评估。
Med Teach. 2008;30(9-10):e196-218. doi: 10.1080/01421590802334267.

引用本文的文献

1
Video-based peer assessment of collaborative teamwork in a large-scale interprofessional learning activity.基于视频的大规模跨专业学习活动中协作团队的同伴评估。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Nov 14;24(1):1307. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06124-4.
2
Exploring medical students' experience of the learning environment: a mixed methods study in Saudi medical college.探索医学生的学习环境体验:沙特医学院的一项混合方法研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Jul 3;24(1):723. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05716-4.
3
Reduction of discrepancies between students and instructors in the assessment of practical tasks through structured evaluation sheets and peer feedback.
通过结构化评估表和同伴反馈减少学生和教师在实践任务评估中的差异。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jan 17;14(1):1514. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-51953-4.
4
Clerkship Chiefs: Introducing Students to the Role of Physician Educator.临床实习主任:向学生介绍医师教育工作者的角色。
Med Sci Educ. 2023 Oct 27;33(6):1533-1538. doi: 10.1007/s40670-023-01928-3. eCollection 2023 Dec.
5
Factors That Determine the Perceived Effectiveness of Peer Feedback in Collaborative Learning: a Mixed Methods Design.协作学习中决定同伴反馈感知有效性的因素:混合方法设计
Med Sci Educ. 2020 May 19;30(3):1145-1156. doi: 10.1007/s40670-020-00980-7. eCollection 2020 Sep.
6
Student Perceptions of a Novel Approach to Promote Professionalism Using Peer Evaluation in a Team-Based Learning™ Setting: a Quality Improvement Project.学生对在基于团队的学习™环境中使用同伴评估来促进职业素养的新方法的看法:一项质量改进项目。
Med Sci Educ. 2019 Oct 16;29(4):1229-1232. doi: 10.1007/s40670-019-00830-1. eCollection 2019 Dec.
7
A Survey of Health Sciences Faculty Practices and Attitudes Regarding the Peer Feedback Component of Team-Based Learning.关于基于团队学习的同伴反馈部分的健康科学教师实践与态度调查
Med Sci Educ. 2019 Sep 13;29(4):1211-1219. doi: 10.1007/s40670-019-00816-z. eCollection 2019 Dec.
8
Unheard Voices: A Qualitative Study of Resident Perspectives on Remediation.未被倾听的声音:一项关于住院医师对补救看法的定性研究。
J Grad Med Educ. 2021 Aug;13(4):507-514. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-20-01481.1. Epub 2021 Aug 13.
9
Faculty's attitudes and perceptions related to applying motivational principles to their teaching: a mixed methods study.教师对将激励原则应用于教学的态度和看法:一项混合方法研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2021 Mar 29;21(1):188. doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-02599-7.
10
Formative peer assessment in higher healthcare education programmes: a scoping review.高等卫生保健教育项目中的形成性同伴评估:一项范围综述
BMJ Open. 2021 Feb 9;11(2):e045345. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045345.