Suppr超能文献

高等卫生保健教育项目中的形成性同伴评估:一项范围综述

Formative peer assessment in higher healthcare education programmes: a scoping review.

作者信息

Stenberg Marie, Mangrio Elisabeth, Bengtsson Mariette, Carlson Elisabeth

机构信息

Department of Care Science, Faculty of Health and Society, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden.

Department of Care Science, Faculty of Health and Society, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2021 Feb 9;11(2):e045345. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045345.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Formative peer assessment focuses on learning and development of the student learning process. This implies that students are taking responsibility for assessing the work of their peers by giving and receiving feedback to each other. The aim was to compile research about formative peer assessment presented in higher healthcare education, focusing on the rationale, the interventions, the experiences of students and teachers and the outcomes of formative assessment interventions.

DESIGN

A scoping review.

DATA SOURCES

Searches were conducted until May 2019 in PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Education Research Complete and Education Research Centre. Grey literature was searched in Library Search, Google Scholar and Science Direct.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Studies addressing formative peer assessment in higher education, focusing on medicine, nursing, midwifery, dentistry, physical or occupational therapy and radiology published in peer-reviewed articles or in grey literature.

DATA EXTRACTIONS AND SYNTHESIS

Out of 1452 studies, 37 met the inclusion criteria and were critically appraised using relevant Critical Appraisal Skills Programme, Joanna Briggs Institute and Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool tools. The pertinent data were analysed using thematic analysis.

RESULT

The critical appraisal resulted in 18 included studies with high and moderate quality. The rationale for using formative peer assessment relates to giving and receiving constructive feedback as a means to promote learning. The experience and outcome of formative peer assessment interventions from the perspective of students and teachers are presented within three themes: (1) organisation and structure of the formative peer assessment activities, (2) personal attributes and consequences for oneself and relationships and (3) experience and outcome of feedback and learning.

CONCLUSION

Healthcare education must consider preparing and introducing students to collaborative learning, and thus develop well-designed learning activities aligned with the learning outcomes. Since peer collaboration seems to affect students' and teachers' experiences of formative peer assessment, empirical investigations exploring collaboration between students are of utmost importance.

摘要

目的

形成性同伴评估侧重于学生学习过程的学习与发展。这意味着学生要通过相互给予和接受反馈,对同伴的作业进行评估。其目的是汇编高等卫生保健教育中关于形成性同伴评估的研究,重点关注其基本原理、干预措施、学生和教师的体验以及形成性评估干预措施的结果。

设计

范围综述。

数据来源

截至2019年5月,在PubMed、护理学与健康相关文献累积索引、教育研究全文数据库和教育研究中心进行了检索。在图书馆搜索、谷歌学术和科学Direct中搜索了灰色文献。

纳入标准

发表在同行评审文章或灰色文献中,涉及高等教育中形成性同伴评估,重点关注医学、护理、助产、牙科、物理治疗或职业治疗以及放射学的研究。

数据提取与综合

在1452项研究中,37项符合纳入标准,并使用相关的批判性评估技能计划、乔安娜·布里格斯研究所和混合方法评估工具进行了严格评估。使用主题分析法对相关数据进行了分析。

结果

严格评估后纳入了18项高质量和中等质量的研究。使用形成性同伴评估的基本原理与给予和接受建设性反馈以促进学习有关。从学生和教师的角度来看,形成性同伴评估干预措施的体验和结果体现在三个主题中:(1)形成性同伴评估活动的组织和结构,(2)个人属性以及对自身和人际关系的影响,(3)反馈与学习的体验和结果。

结论

卫生保健教育必须考虑让学生做好协作学习的准备并引入协作学习,从而开展与学习成果相一致的精心设计的学习活动。由于同伴协作似乎会影响学生和教师对形成性同伴评估的体验,因此探索学生之间协作的实证研究至关重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f82c/7875268/ae659c89a9df/bmjopen-2020-045345f01.jpg

相似文献

1
Formative peer assessment in higher healthcare education programmes: a scoping review.
BMJ Open. 2021 Feb 9;11(2):e045345. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045345.
2
Formative peer assessment in healthcare education programmes: protocol for a scoping review.
BMJ Open. 2018 Nov 8;8(11):e025055. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025055.
5
Impact of summer programmes on the outcomes of disadvantaged or 'at risk' young people: A systematic review.
Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 13;20(2):e1406. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1406. eCollection 2024 Jun.
6
Evaluation of a formative peer assessment in research methods teaching using an online platform: A mixed methods pre-post study.
Nurse Educ Today. 2022 Jan;108:105166. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2021.105166. Epub 2021 Oct 12.
8
Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):14-26. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1694.
10
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.

引用本文的文献

7
Innovative Tele-Instruction Approach Impacts Basic Life Support Performance: A Non-inferiority Trial.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 May 12;9:825823. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.825823. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
4
Collaboration in Health Care.
J Med Imaging Radiat Sci. 2017 Jun;48(2):207-216. doi: 10.1016/j.jmir.2017.02.071. Epub 2017 May 31.
5
Formative peer assessment in healthcare education programmes: protocol for a scoping review.
BMJ Open. 2018 Nov 8;8(11):e025055. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025055.
6
Peer assessment practices in nurse education: An integrative review.
Nurse Educ Today. 2018 Dec;71:266-275. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2018.09.017. Epub 2018 Sep 21.
9
A Novel Approach to Assessing Professionalism in Preclinical Medical Students Using Multisource Feedback Through Paired Self- and Peer Evaluations.
Teach Learn Med. 2017 Oct-Dec;29(4):402-410. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2017.1306446. Epub 2017 May 12.
10
Peer assessment in the objective structured clinical examination: A scoping review.
Med Teach. 2017 Jul;39(7):745-756. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2017.1309375. Epub 2017 Apr 11.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验