Stenberg Marie, Mangrio Elisabeth, Bengtsson Mariette, Carlson Elisabeth
Department of Care Science, Faculty of Health and Society, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden.
Department of Care Science, Faculty of Health and Society, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden
BMJ Open. 2021 Feb 9;11(2):e045345. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045345.
Formative peer assessment focuses on learning and development of the student learning process. This implies that students are taking responsibility for assessing the work of their peers by giving and receiving feedback to each other. The aim was to compile research about formative peer assessment presented in higher healthcare education, focusing on the rationale, the interventions, the experiences of students and teachers and the outcomes of formative assessment interventions.
A scoping review.
Searches were conducted until May 2019 in PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Education Research Complete and Education Research Centre. Grey literature was searched in Library Search, Google Scholar and Science Direct.
Studies addressing formative peer assessment in higher education, focusing on medicine, nursing, midwifery, dentistry, physical or occupational therapy and radiology published in peer-reviewed articles or in grey literature.
Out of 1452 studies, 37 met the inclusion criteria and were critically appraised using relevant Critical Appraisal Skills Programme, Joanna Briggs Institute and Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool tools. The pertinent data were analysed using thematic analysis.
The critical appraisal resulted in 18 included studies with high and moderate quality. The rationale for using formative peer assessment relates to giving and receiving constructive feedback as a means to promote learning. The experience and outcome of formative peer assessment interventions from the perspective of students and teachers are presented within three themes: (1) organisation and structure of the formative peer assessment activities, (2) personal attributes and consequences for oneself and relationships and (3) experience and outcome of feedback and learning.
Healthcare education must consider preparing and introducing students to collaborative learning, and thus develop well-designed learning activities aligned with the learning outcomes. Since peer collaboration seems to affect students' and teachers' experiences of formative peer assessment, empirical investigations exploring collaboration between students are of utmost importance.
形成性同伴评估侧重于学生学习过程的学习与发展。这意味着学生要通过相互给予和接受反馈,对同伴的作业进行评估。其目的是汇编高等卫生保健教育中关于形成性同伴评估的研究,重点关注其基本原理、干预措施、学生和教师的体验以及形成性评估干预措施的结果。
范围综述。
截至2019年5月,在PubMed、护理学与健康相关文献累积索引、教育研究全文数据库和教育研究中心进行了检索。在图书馆搜索、谷歌学术和科学Direct中搜索了灰色文献。
发表在同行评审文章或灰色文献中,涉及高等教育中形成性同伴评估,重点关注医学、护理、助产、牙科、物理治疗或职业治疗以及放射学的研究。
在1452项研究中,37项符合纳入标准,并使用相关的批判性评估技能计划、乔安娜·布里格斯研究所和混合方法评估工具进行了严格评估。使用主题分析法对相关数据进行了分析。
严格评估后纳入了18项高质量和中等质量的研究。使用形成性同伴评估的基本原理与给予和接受建设性反馈以促进学习有关。从学生和教师的角度来看,形成性同伴评估干预措施的体验和结果体现在三个主题中:(1)形成性同伴评估活动的组织和结构,(2)个人属性以及对自身和人际关系的影响,(3)反馈与学习的体验和结果。
卫生保健教育必须考虑让学生做好协作学习的准备并引入协作学习,从而开展与学习成果相一致的精心设计的学习活动。由于同伴协作似乎会影响学生和教师对形成性同伴评估的体验,因此探索学生之间协作的实证研究至关重要。