Goldfield Norbert
3M Health Information Systems, Inc, Wallingford, Connecticut 06492, USA.
Qual Manag Health Care. 2010 Jan-Mar;19(1):3-16. doi: 10.1097/QMH.0b013e3181ccbcc3.
Policymakers are searching for ways to control health care costs and improve quality. Diagnosis-related groups (DRGs) are by far the most important cost control and quality improvement tool that governments and private payers have implemented. This article reviews why DRGs have had this singular success both in the hospital sector and, over the past 10 years, in ambulatory and managed care settings. Last, the author reviews current trends in the development and implementation of tools that have the key ingredients of DRG success: categorical clinical model, separation of the clinical model from payment weights, separate payment adjustments for nonclinical factors, and outlier payments. Virtually all current tools used to manage health care costs and improve quality do not have these characteristics. This failure explains a key reason for the failure, for example, of the Medicare Advantage program to control health care costs. This article concludes with a discussion of future developments for DRG-type models outside the hospital sector.
政策制定者们正在寻找控制医疗成本和提高质量的方法。诊断相关分组(DRGs)是迄今为止政府和私人支付方实施的最重要的成本控制和质量改进工具。本文回顾了DRGs在医院部门以及在过去十年中在门诊和管理式医疗环境中取得如此显著成功的原因。最后,作者回顾了当前具有DRG成功关键要素的工具的开发和实施趋势:分类临床模型、临床模型与支付权重的分离、针对非临床因素的单独支付调整以及异常值支付。几乎所有当前用于管理医疗成本和提高质量的工具都不具备这些特征。例如,这一缺陷解释了医疗保险优势计划在控制医疗成本方面失败的一个关键原因。本文最后讨论了医院部门以外DRG类模型的未来发展。