• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[在智利使用诊断相关分组:经验与挑战 智利使用诊断相关分组的经验与挑战]

[Using diagnosis-related groups in Chile: lessons and challengesLições e desafios do uso de grupos de diagnósticos relacionados no Chile].

作者信息

Cid Camilo, Dawson Nancy, Medina Camila, Espinoza Augusto, Bastías Gabriel

机构信息

Fondo Nacional de Salud (FONASA) Santiago de Chile Chile Fondo Nacional de Salud (FONASA), Santiago de Chile, Chile.

Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile Santiago de Chile Chile Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago de Chile, Chile.

出版信息

Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2024 Sep 7;48:e67. doi: 10.26633/RPSP.2024.67. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.26633/RPSP.2024.67
PMID:39247390
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11379091/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Analyze the implementation of diagnosis-related groups (DRGs) in Chile with a view to optimizing the distribution of public resources.

METHODS

A chronological narrative analysis of the main milestones was complemented by simulated application of DRGs through emulated competition and cluster analysis for evaluative purposes.

RESULTS

In 2001, DRGs were introduced in Chile in an academic context. The National Health Fund (FONASA) began using DRGs in the private sector. A public sector pilot was launched in 2015. After nearly two decades of progress, in 2020 FONASA established the DRG program as a payment mechanism for public hospitals. However, the COVID-19 pandemic slowed its development. In 2022, implementation was resumed. After evaluating the program, it was evident that the hospital clusters that had been predefined for differentiated payment did not successfully differentiate homogeneous groups. In 2023, the program was reformed, financing was increased, a single cluster and base rate were defined, and greater hospital complexity was recognized, compared to previous years. Three hospitals were added to the program, for a total of 68.

CONCLUSIONS

This experience shows that it is possible to sustain a public health financing policy that achieves greater efficiency and equity in the health system, based on the existence of robust institutions that continuously develop and improve.

摘要

目的

分析智利诊断相关分组(DRGs)的实施情况,以优化公共资源分配。

方法

对主要里程碑进行按时间顺序的叙述性分析,并通过模拟竞争和聚类分析对DRGs进行模拟应用,以进行评估。

结果

2001年,DRGs在智利的学术背景下被引入。国家卫生基金(FONASA)开始在私营部门使用DRGs。2015年启动了公共部门试点。经过近二十年的发展,2020年FONASA将DRG计划确立为公立医院的支付机制。然而,新冠疫情减缓了其发展。2022年,实施工作恢复。在对该计划进行评估后,很明显,为差异化支付预先定义的医院集群未能成功区分同类群体。2023年,该计划进行了改革,增加了资金,确定了单一集群和基础费率,并且与前几年相比,认识到了更高的医院复杂性。该计划新增了三家医院,总数达到68家。

结论

这一经验表明,基于持续发展和完善的强大机构,维持一项能在卫生系统中实现更高效率和公平性的公共卫生筹资政策是可行的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb2d/11379091/dc04e526a16e/rpsp-48-e67_Figure3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb2d/11379091/06d9c6a50cfb/rpsp-48-e67_Figure1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb2d/11379091/2e4a477753ee/rpsp-48-e67_Figure2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb2d/11379091/dc04e526a16e/rpsp-48-e67_Figure3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb2d/11379091/06d9c6a50cfb/rpsp-48-e67_Figure1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb2d/11379091/2e4a477753ee/rpsp-48-e67_Figure2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb2d/11379091/dc04e526a16e/rpsp-48-e67_Figure3.jpg

相似文献

1
[Using diagnosis-related groups in Chile: lessons and challengesLições e desafios do uso de grupos de diagnósticos relacionados no Chile].[在智利使用诊断相关分组:经验与挑战 智利使用诊断相关分组的经验与挑战]
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2024 Sep 7;48:e67. doi: 10.26633/RPSP.2024.67. eCollection 2024.
2
Healthcare payment mechanism: Execution results of bundled payment program for bariatric surgery diagnosis in its first year of implementation in Chile.医疗保健支付机制:在智利实施肥胖症手术诊断捆绑支付计划的第一年的执行结果。
Medwave. 2024 Jan 3;24(1). doi: 10.5867/medwave.2024.01.2762.
3
Hospital concessions in Chile: where we are and where we are heading.智利的医院特许权:我们所处的位置以及前进的方向。
Medwave. 2014 Nov 25;14(10):e6039. doi: 10.5867/medwave.2014.10.6039.
4
Has DRG payment influenced the technical efficiency and productivity of diagnostic technologies in Portuguese public hospitals? An empirical analysis using parametric and non-parametric methods.疾病诊断相关分组(DRG)支付方式对葡萄牙公立医院诊断技术的技术效率和生产率有影响吗?一项使用参数和非参数方法的实证分析。
Health Care Manag Sci. 1999 May;2(2):107-16. doi: 10.1023/a:1019027509833.
5
The effects of diagnosis-related groups payment on hospital healthcare in China: a systematic review.按疾病诊断相关分组付费对中国医院医疗服务的影响:系统评价。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Feb 12;20(1):112. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-4957-5.
6
[Validation of COVID-19 vaccines administered abroad: experience and challenges of implementation in ChileRegistro de vacinação contra a COVID-19: experiência e desafios relacionados com a implementação no Chile].[在国外接种的新冠疫苗验证:智利的实施经验与挑战 新冠疫苗接种登记:智利实施过程中的经验与挑战]
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2023 Apr 14;47:e62. doi: 10.26633/RPSP.2023.62. eCollection 2023.
7
After the revolution: DRGs at age 30.革命之后:30 岁时的 DRGs。
Ann Intern Med. 2014 Mar 18;160(6):426-9. doi: 10.7326/M13-2115.
8
Mortality outcomes in hospitals with public, private not-for-profit and private for-profit ownership in Chile 2001-2010.2001 - 2010年智利公立医院、私立非营利性医院和私立营利性医院的死亡率结果
Health Policy Plan. 2015 Mar;30 Suppl 1:i75-81. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czu143.
9
The impact of introducing a new hospital financing system (DRGs) in Poland on hospitalisations for atherosclerosis: An interrupted time series analysis (2004-2012).引入新的医院融资系统(DRGs)对波兰动脉粥样硬化住院治疗的影响:一项中断时间序列分析(2004-2012 年)。
Health Policy. 2017 Nov;121(11):1186-1193. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2017.09.009. Epub 2017 Sep 20.
10
Poland health system review.波兰医疗体系综述。
Health Syst Transit. 2011;13(8):1-193.

本文引用的文献

1
[Why are diagnosis-related groups unpopular in Colombia?].[为什么诊断相关分组在哥伦比亚不受欢迎?]
Cad Saude Publica. 2015 Sep;31(9):2027-31. doi: 10.1590/0102-311X00170114.
2
[Evaluation of financial status of public hospitals considering the updated costs of their services].[考虑公立医院服务更新成本的财务状况评估]
Rev Med Chil. 2014 Feb;142(2):161-7. doi: 10.4067/S0034-98872014000200003.
3
Hospital payment systems based on diagnosis-related groups: experiences in low- and middle-income countries.基于疾病诊断相关分组的医院支付系统:在中低收入国家的经验。
Bull World Health Organ. 2013 Oct 1;91(10):746-756A. doi: 10.2471/BLT.12.115931. Epub 2013 Aug 6.
4
Diagnosis related groups in Europe: moving towards transparency, efficiency, and quality in hospitals?欧洲的诊断相关分组:医院是否正朝着透明、高效和高质量发展?
BMJ. 2013 Jun 7;346:f3197. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f3197.
5
The evolution of diagnosis-related groups (DRGs): from its beginnings in case-mix and resource use theory, to its implementation for payment and now for its current utilization for quality within and outside the hospital.诊断相关分组(DRGs)的演变:从其在病例组合和资源利用理论中的起源,到用于支付的实施,再到如今在医院内外用于质量方面的当前应用。
Qual Manag Health Care. 2010 Jan-Mar;19(1):3-16. doi: 10.1097/QMH.0b013e3181ccbcc3.
6
Diagnosis related groups: product line management within hospitals.诊断相关分组:医院内部的产品线管理。
Acad Manage Rev. 1986 Jan;11(1):41-54.
7
Case mix definition by diagnosis-related groups.按诊断相关分组进行病例组合定义。
Med Care. 1980 Feb;18(2 Suppl):iii, 1-53.