• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对正立和倒立面孔的感知形状敏感性反映在神经元适应中。

Perceptual shape sensitivity to upright and inverted faces is reflected in neuronal adaptation.

机构信息

Department of Neurobiology, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel.

出版信息

Neuroimage. 2010 Apr 1;50(2):383-95. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.12.077. Epub 2009 Dec 28.

DOI:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.12.077
PMID:20044007
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3221039/
Abstract

Using an fMR-adaptation paradigm for different face morphing levels we have recently demonstrated a narrow neuronal tuning to faces even at the sub-exemplar level which was tightly related to perceptual discrimination (Gilaie-Dotan and Malach, 2007). However, it is unclear whether this relationship is unique to faces or is a general property of object representations including unfamiliar objects, and whether the adaptation tuning is due to physical changes in the stimulus or to changes in perceptual discrimination. Here we compared the same face-morph paradigm for upright and inverted faces, thus modulating familiarity and perceptual discrimination effects while equating all low-level features. We found, as expected, a perceptual "inversion effect", i.e. a significant reduction in inverted face discrimination. Importantly, the fMR-adaptation tuning in the fusiform face area (FFA) changed in accordance with the different perceptual sensitivity both for upright and inverted faces. Additional object selective regions displayed differential tuning widths to the two categories. Our results are compatible with a model by which the ability of human observers to discriminate objects depends on the shape tuning properties of individual neurons.

摘要

利用不同面孔变形水平的 fMRI 适应范式,我们最近证明了即使在亚范例水平,神经元对面孔也有狭窄的调谐,这种调谐与知觉辨别紧密相关(Gilaie-Dotan 和 Malach,2007)。然而,目前尚不清楚这种关系是否是面孔所特有的,还是包括不熟悉物体在内的物体表示的一般属性,以及适应调谐是否是由于刺激的物理变化还是由于知觉辨别力的变化所致。在这里,我们比较了相同的面孔变形范式用于直立和倒置的面孔,从而调节熟悉度和知觉辨别效果,同时使所有低水平特征保持一致。正如预期的那样,我们发现了一种知觉的“反转效应”,即倒置面孔的辨别力显著降低。重要的是,梭状回面孔区(FFA)中的 fMRI 适应调谐与直立和倒置面孔的不同知觉敏感性相符。其他的物体选择性区域对两个类别显示出不同的调谐宽度。我们的结果与这样一种模型是一致的,即人类观察者辨别物体的能力取决于单个神经元的形状调谐特性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8137/3221039/4e9c419bc600/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8137/3221039/ce1be7ce6fa8/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8137/3221039/e770602c201a/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8137/3221039/4bc7c30ab720/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8137/3221039/bcc25cdb4294/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8137/3221039/4e9c419bc600/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8137/3221039/ce1be7ce6fa8/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8137/3221039/e770602c201a/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8137/3221039/4bc7c30ab720/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8137/3221039/bcc25cdb4294/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8137/3221039/4e9c419bc600/gr5.jpg

相似文献

1
Perceptual shape sensitivity to upright and inverted faces is reflected in neuronal adaptation.对正立和倒立面孔的感知形状敏感性反映在神经元适应中。
Neuroimage. 2010 Apr 1;50(2):383-95. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.12.077. Epub 2009 Dec 28.
2
Recovery from adaptation to facial identity is larger for upright than inverted faces in the human occipito-temporal cortex.在人类枕颞叶皮层中,从对面部身份的适应中恢复过来的程度,正立面孔比倒立面孔更大。
Neuropsychologia. 2006;44(6):912-22. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.08.015. Epub 2005 Oct 17.
3
Sub-exemplar shape tuning in human face-related areas.人类面部相关区域中的子范例形状调谐
Cereb Cortex. 2007 Feb;17(2):325-38. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhj150. Epub 2006 Mar 8.
4
Image-invariant responses in face-selective regions do not explain the perceptual advantage for familiar face recognition.面孔选择性区域的不变响应并不能解释熟悉面孔识别的知觉优势。
Cereb Cortex. 2013 Feb;23(2):370-7. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhs024. Epub 2012 Feb 17.
5
Cortical correlates of face and scene inversion: a comparison.面部与场景倒置的皮层关联:一项比较
Neuropsychologia. 2006;44(7):1145-58. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.10.009. Epub 2005 Nov 21.
6
The body inversion effect is mediated by face-selective, not body-selective, mechanisms.身体反转效应是由选择性的面孔加工机制,而非身体加工机制介导的。
J Neurosci. 2010 Aug 4;30(31):10534-40. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0911-10.2010.
7
Reduced neural selectivity increases fMRI adaptation with age during face discrimination.在面孔识别中,随着年龄的增长,神经选择性的降低会增加 fMRI 适应。
Neuroimage. 2010 May 15;51(1):336-44. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.01.107. Epub 2010 Feb 6.
8
Perception and conception: temporal lobe activity during complex discriminations of familiar and novel faces and objects.感知与认知:在对熟悉和陌生面孔及物体进行复杂辨别时大脑颞叶的活动。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2011 Oct;23(10):3052-67. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00010. Epub 2011 Mar 10.
9
The role of lateral occipital face and object areas in the face inversion effect.侧枕叶面孔区和物体区在面孔倒置效应中的作用。
Neuropsychologia. 2011 Oct;49(12):3448-53. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.08.020. Epub 2011 Aug 30.
10
Face-identity change activation outside the face system: "release from adaptation" may not always indicate neuronal selectivity.面部系统外的面孔身份变化激活:“适应释放”并不总是表明神经元的选择性。
Cereb Cortex. 2010 Sep;20(9):2027-42. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhp272. Epub 2010 Jan 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Benton facial recognition test scores for predicting fusiform gyrus activity during face perception.用于预测面部感知过程中梭状回活动的本顿面部识别测试分数。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 2;15(1):22507. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-06468-x.
2
Extensive Visual Training in Adulthood Reduces an Implicit Neural Marker of the Face Inversion Effect.成年期的广泛视觉训练可减少面部倒置效应的一种隐性神经标记。
Brain Sci. 2024 Jan 30;14(2):146. doi: 10.3390/brainsci14020146.
3
Parafoveal vision reveals qualitative differences between fusiform face area and parahippocampal place area.

本文引用的文献

1
A face feature space in the macaque temporal lobe.猕猴颞叶中的面部特征空间。
Nat Neurosci. 2009 Sep;12(9):1187-96. doi: 10.1038/nn.2363. Epub 2009 Aug 9.
2
Time course and stimulus dependence of repetition-induced response suppression in inferotemporal cortex.颞下皮质中重复诱导反应抑制的时间进程和刺激依赖性
J Neurophysiol. 2009 Jan;101(1):418-36. doi: 10.1152/jn.90960.2008. Epub 2008 Nov 5.
3
Stimulus similarity-contingent neural adaptation can be time and cortical area dependent.刺激相似性依赖的神经适应可能取决于时间和皮层区域。
旁视网膜区视觉揭示了梭状回面孔区和旁海马体位置区之间的定性差异。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2024 Feb 15;45(3):e26616. doi: 10.1002/hbm.26616.
4
Contributions of low- and high-level contextual mechanisms to human face perception.低水平和高水平语境机制对人类面孔感知的贡献。
PLoS One. 2023 May 2;18(5):e0285255. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285255. eCollection 2023.
5
Intracerebral Electrophysiological Recordings to Understand the Neural Basis of Human Face Recognition.颅内电生理记录以了解人脸识别的神经基础。
Brain Sci. 2023 Feb 18;13(2):354. doi: 10.3390/brainsci13020354.
6
fMRI evidence that hyper-caricatured faces activate object-selective cortex.功能磁共振成像证据表明,过度夸张的面部会激活物体选择性皮层。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 12;13:1035524. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1035524. eCollection 2022.
7
Mask exposure during COVID-19 changes emotional face processing.在 COVID-19 期间戴口罩会改变对情绪面孔的加工。
PLoS One. 2021 Oct 12;16(10):e0258470. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258470. eCollection 2021.
8
Does face-selective cortex show a left visual field bias for centrally-viewed faces?选择性面部皮层是否对面部中央呈现左视野优势?
Neuropsychologia. 2021 Aug 20;159:107956. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2021.107956. Epub 2021 Jul 13.
9
Investigating face and house discrimination at foveal to parafoveal locations reveals category-specific characteristics.在中央凹到周边位置上进行面孔和房屋歧视的研究揭示了类别特异性特征。
Sci Rep. 2020 May 20;10(1):8306. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-65239-y.
10
Human Face-Selective Cortex Does Not Distinguish between Members of a Racial Outgroup.人面选择性皮质不区分种族外群体的成员。
eNeuro. 2020 May 29;7(3). doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0431-19.2020. Print 2020 May/Jun.
J Neurosci. 2008 Oct 15;28(42):10631-40. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3333-08.2008.
4
The correlates of subjective perception of identity and expression in the face network: an fMRI adaptation study.面部网络中身份和表情主观感知的相关因素:一项功能磁共振成像适应研究。
Neuroimage. 2009 Jan 15;44(2):569-80. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.09.011. Epub 2008 Sep 25.
5
Class information predicts activation by object fragments in human object areas.类别信息可预测人类物体区域中物体碎片引起的激活。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2008 Jul;20(7):1189-206. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2008.20082.
6
Ultra-fine frequency tuning revealed in single neurons of human auditory cortex.人类听觉皮层单个神经元中发现超精细频率调谐
Nature. 2008 Jan 10;451(7175):197-201. doi: 10.1038/nature06476.
7
How does the brain process upright and inverted faces?大脑如何处理正立和倒立的面孔?
Behav Cogn Neurosci Rev. 2002 Mar;1(1):63-75. doi: 10.1177/1534582302001001004.
8
Face inversion disproportionately impairs the perception of vertical but not horizontal relations between features.面部倒置对垂直方向特征关系的感知损害尤为严重,而对水平方向特征关系的感知则不然。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2007 Aug;33(4):995-1002. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.33.4.995.
9
Repetition suppression in monkey inferotemporal cortex: relation to behavioral priming.猕猴颞下皮质中的重复抑制:与行为启动的关系。
J Neurophysiol. 2007 May;97(5):3532-43. doi: 10.1152/jn.01042.2006. Epub 2007 Mar 7.
10
Can generic expertise explain special processing for faces?一般专业知识能解释对面孔的特殊加工吗?
Trends Cogn Sci. 2007 Jan;11(1):8-15. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2006.11.002. Epub 2006 Nov 28.