• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

视力是宝贵的:一项成功的行为干预措施,提高了城市内成年人糖尿病视网膜病变筛查率。

Vision is precious: a successful behavioral intervention to increase the rate of screening for diabetic retinopathy for inner-city adults.

机构信息

Medgar Evers College, City University of New York, Department of Psychology, Brooklyn, New York (Dr Jones)

The Diabetes Research Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York (Dr Walker, Dr Schechter, Ms Blanco)

出版信息

Diabetes Educ. 2010 Jan-Feb;36(1):118-26. doi: 10.1177/0145721709356116. Epub 2009 Dec 31.

DOI:10.1177/0145721709356116
PMID:20044537
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4582664/
Abstract

PURPOSE

This purpose of this report is to describe a successful telephone intervention to increase the rate of diabetic retinopathy screening, its implementation with English and Spanish speakers, and the characteristics of those who benefited most from the intervention.

METHODS

Participants in the telephone group (N = 305) received a tailored intervention from trained health educators who were ethnically diverse and representative of the community. The main outcome for the randomized controlled study was documented receipt of a dilated fundus examination (DFE) within the 6-month study window. Exploratory analyses focused on examining the factors that contribute to receiving a DFE within 6 months for participants in the tailored telephone intervention using Pearson chi(2) and logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

Participants in the telephone intervention who did not receive a DFE had significantly more documented steps in the behavioral process than those who did receive a DFE, and ethnic concordance of the health educator was not significantly associated with a positive outcome in the DFE group. There was a negative association between the time spent building rapport and receipt of DFE. As time spent engaging in educational activities by telephone increased, the likelihood of receiving a DFE increased.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the telephone intervention was highly successful compared with the print intervention, these process results demonstrate the difficulties and challenges of conducting a tailored telephone intervention to improve rates of screening in an underserved, diverse urban community.

摘要

目的

本报告旨在描述一项成功的电话干预措施,以提高糖尿病视网膜病变筛查率,介绍该措施在英语和西班牙语使用者中的实施情况,以及从干预中受益最多的人群的特征。

方法

电话组(n = 305)的参与者接受了经过培训的健康教育者的个性化干预,这些健康教育者具有种族多样性且能代表社区。这项随机对照研究的主要结果是在 6 个月的研究窗口内记录到接受散瞳眼底检查(DFE)。使用 Pearson chi(2)和逻辑回归分析,对探索性分析侧重于检查个性化电话干预措施中参与者在 6 个月内接受 DFE 的因素。

结果

未接受 DFE 的电话干预组参与者在行为过程中记录的步骤明显多于接受 DFE 的参与者,且健康教育者的种族一致性与 DFE 组的阳性结果并无显著相关性。建立融洽关系所花费的时间与接受 DFE 的时间呈负相关。随着通过电话进行教育活动的时间增加,接受 DFE 的可能性也随之增加。

结论

尽管与印刷干预相比,电话干预措施非常成功,但这些过程结果表明,在服务不足且多样化的城市社区中,开展个性化电话干预以提高筛查率具有困难和挑战。

相似文献

1
Vision is precious: a successful behavioral intervention to increase the rate of screening for diabetic retinopathy for inner-city adults.视力是宝贵的:一项成功的行为干预措施,提高了城市内成年人糖尿病视网膜病变筛查率。
Diabetes Educ. 2010 Jan-Feb;36(1):118-26. doi: 10.1177/0145721709356116. Epub 2009 Dec 31.
2
Telephone intervention to promote diabetic retinopathy screening among the urban poor.通过电话干预促进城市贫困人口的糖尿病视网膜病变筛查。
Am J Prev Med. 2008 Mar;34(3):185-91. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2007.11.020.
3
Incentives and barriers to retinopathy screening among African-Americans with diabetes.非裔美国糖尿病患者视网膜病变筛查的激励因素与障碍
J Diabetes Complications. 1997 Sep-Oct;11(5):298-306. doi: 10.1016/s1056-8727(96)00121-3.
4
Effect of Behavioral Intervention on Dilated Fundus Examination Rates in Older African American Individuals With Diabetes Mellitus: A Randomized Clinical Trial.行为干预对老年非裔美国糖尿病患者散瞳眼底检查率的影响:一项随机临床试验
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015 Sep;133(9):1005-12. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2015.1760.
5
Prospective randomized controlled trial comparing the outcomes and costs of two eyecare adherence interventions in diabetes patients.比较糖尿病患者两种眼部护理依从性干预措施的效果和成本的前瞻性随机对照试验。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2015 Apr;13(2):253-63. doi: 10.1007/s40258-015-0159-4.
6
Tailored and targeted interventions to encourage dilated fundus examinations in older African Americans.为鼓励老年非裔美国人进行散瞳眼底检查而量身定制和有的放矢的干预措施。
Arch Ophthalmol. 2011 Dec;129(12):1592-8. doi: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2011.190.
7
Cost effectiveness of a telephone intervention to promote dilated fundus examination in adults with diabetes mellitus.一项促进糖尿病成人进行散瞳眼底检查的电话干预措施的成本效益分析
Clin Ophthalmol. 2008 Dec;2(4):763-8. doi: 10.2147/opth.s3232.
8
Telephone outreach to increase colorectal cancer screening in an urban minority population.通过电话外展服务提高城市少数族裔人群的结直肠癌筛查率。
Am J Public Health. 2006 Dec;96(12):2246-53. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2005.067223. Epub 2006 Oct 31.
9
An Education- and Telephone-Based Intervention to Improve Follow-up to Vision Care in Patients With Diabetes: A Prospective, Single-Blinded, Randomized Trial.一项基于教育和电话的干预措施,以改善糖尿病患者视力保健的随访情况:一项前瞻性、单盲、随机试验。
Am J Med Qual. 2016 Mar-Apr;31(2):156-61. doi: 10.1177/1062860614552670. Epub 2014 Sep 30.
10
Effect of a tailored leaflet to promote diabetic retinopathy screening among young adults with type 2 diabetes: a randomised controlled trial.一份定制传单对促进2型糖尿病青年成人糖尿病视网膜病变筛查的效果:一项随机对照试验。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2020 Mar 2;20(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s12886-020-1311-y.

引用本文的文献

1
An online diabetic retinopathy screening tool for patients with type 2 diabetes.一种用于2型糖尿病患者的在线糖尿病视网膜病变筛查工具。
Int J Ophthalmol. 2021 Nov 18;14(11):1748-1755. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2021.11.15. eCollection 2021.
2
Interventions to promote access to eyecare for non-dominant ethnic groups in high-income countries: a scoping review.促进高收入国家少数民族群体获得眼科保健服务的干预措施:范围综述。
BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Sep;6(9). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-006188.
3
Increasing Engagement of African American Patients with Glaucoma during Medical Encounters: Creation of a Pre-visit Video.提高非裔美国青光眼患者在就医过程中的参与度:制作预诊视频。
Optom Vis Sci. 2020 Jul;97(7):503-508. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000001530.
4
Interventions to promote access to eye care for non-Indigenous, non-dominant ethnic groups in high-income countries: a scoping review protocol.促进高收入国家非土著、非优势少数民族群体获得眼科保健的干预措施:范围综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2020 Jun 3;10(6):e033775. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033775.
5
Systematic review on barriers and enablers for access to diabetic retinopathy screening services in different income settings.系统评价不同收入环境下获得糖尿病视网膜病变筛查服务的障碍和促进因素。
PLoS One. 2019 Apr 23;14(4):e0198979. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198979. eCollection 2019.
6
Interventions to increase attendance for diabetic retinopathy screening.提高糖尿病视网膜病变筛查参与率的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 15;1(1):CD012054. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012054.pub2.
7
African American Patient Preferences for Glaucoma Education.非裔美国患者对青光眼教育的偏好
Optom Vis Sci. 2017 Apr;94(4):482-486. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000001059.
8
Eye Care Quality and Accessibility Improvement in the Community (EQUALITY) for adults at risk for glaucoma: study rationale and design.社区青光眼高危成年人的眼保健质量与可及性改善(EQUALITY):研究原理与设计
Int J Equity Health. 2015 Nov 18;14:135. doi: 10.1186/s12939-015-0213-8.
9
Effect of an eye health education program on older African Americans' eye care utilization and attitudes about eye care.眼健康教育培训计划对老年非裔美国人眼保健利用和眼保健态度的影响。
J Natl Med Assoc. 2013 Spring;105(1):69-76. doi: 10.1016/s0027-9684(15)30087-0.
10
Developing a multidisciplinary model of comparative effectiveness research within a clinical and translational science award.在临床和转化科学奖中开发多学科比较效果研究模型。
Acad Med. 2011 Jun;86(6):712-7. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e318217ea82.

本文引用的文献

1
Cost effectiveness of a telephone intervention to promote dilated fundus examination in adults with diabetes mellitus.一项促进糖尿病成人进行散瞳眼底检查的电话干预措施的成本效益分析
Clin Ophthalmol. 2008 Dec;2(4):763-8. doi: 10.2147/opth.s3232.
2
Telephone intervention to promote diabetic retinopathy screening among the urban poor.通过电话干预促进城市贫困人口的糖尿病视网膜病变筛查。
Am J Prev Med. 2008 Mar;34(3):185-91. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2007.11.020.
3
Diabetes health disparities: a systematic review of health care interventions.糖尿病健康差异:医疗保健干预措施的系统评价
Med Care Res Rev. 2007 Oct;64(5 Suppl):101S-56S. doi: 10.1177/1077558707305409.
4
AADE position statement. Cultural sensitivity and diabetes education: recommendations for diabetes educators.美国糖尿病教育者协会立场声明。文化敏感性与糖尿病教育:给糖尿病教育工作者的建议。
Diabetes Educ. 2007 Jan-Feb;33(1):41-4. doi: 10.1177/0145721706298202.
5
Concordance of race or ethnicity of interventionists and caregivers of dementia patients: relationship to attrition and treatment outcomes in the REACH study.痴呆症患者干预者与照料者的种族或族裔一致性:与REACH研究中的失访及治疗结果的关系
Gerontologist. 2006 Aug;46(4):449-55. doi: 10.1093/geront/46.4.449.
6
Diabetic retinopathy in a multi-ethnic cohort in the United States.美国一个多民族队列中的糖尿病视网膜病变
Am J Ophthalmol. 2006 Mar;141(3):446-455. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2005.08.063.
7
The prevalence of diabetic retinopathy among adults in the United States.美国成年人中糖尿病视网膜病变的患病率。
Arch Ophthalmol. 2004 Apr;122(4):552-63. doi: 10.1001/archopht.122.4.552.
8
Recruitment methods for community-based screening for diabetic retinopathy.
Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2000 Sep;7(3):209-18.
9
The effect of health education on the rate of ophthalmic examinations among African Americans with diabetes mellitus.健康教育对非裔美国糖尿病患者眼科检查率的影响。
Am J Public Health. 1999 Dec;89(12):1878-82. doi: 10.2105/ajph.89.12.1878.
10
Barriers to compliance with screening guidelines for diabetic retinopathy.
Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 1999 Mar;6(1):61-72. doi: 10.1076/opep.6.1.61.1563.