Department of Biology, The University of Texas at San Antonio, One UTSA Circle, San Antonio, TX 78249, USA.
Brain Res. 2010 Feb 26;1316:62-74. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2009.12.041. Epub 2010 Jan 4.
Much research has focused on the paradoxical effects of thought suppression, leading to the viewpoint that increases in unwanted thoughts are due to an ironic monitoring process that increases the activation of the very thoughts one is trying to rid from consciousness. However, it remains unclear from behavioral findings whether suppressed thoughts become more accessible during the act of suppression. In the current study, event-related potentials were recorded while participants suppressed or expressed thoughts of a focus word during a simple lexical decision task. Modulations in the N400 component reported here demonstrate the paradoxical effects occurring at the semantic level during suppression, as well as some evidence for the rebound effect after suppression periods. Interestingly, semantic activation was greater for focus words during suppression than expression, despite differences in the N1 window suggesting that expression elicited greater perceptual processing than suppression. Results provide electrophysiological evidence for the Ironic Process model and support recent claims of asymmetric network activation during thought suppression.
大量研究集中于思维抑制的矛盾效应,导致这样一种观点,即不想要的思维增加是由于一种讽刺性的监控过程,该过程增加了人们试图从意识中摆脱的思维的激活。然而,从行为发现中尚不清楚在抑制过程中,被抑制的思维是否变得更容易接近。在当前的研究中,参与者在简单的词汇决策任务中抑制或表达焦点词的思维时,记录了事件相关电位。这里报告的 N400 成分的调制表明,在抑制过程中,语义层面会发生矛盾效应,并且在抑制期后会出现反弹效应的一些证据。有趣的是,尽管在 N1 窗口中存在差异表明表达比抑制引起更大的感知处理,但在抑制期间,焦点词的语义激活大于表达,这表明抑制会引起语义激活。研究结果为讽刺过程模型提供了电生理证据,并支持了思维抑制期间不对称网络激活的最新观点。