• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美罗培南单药治疗与亚胺培南治疗脑脓肿的疗效相当,且安全性更高。

Meropenem monotherapy is as effective as and safer than imipenem to treat brain abscesses.

机构信息

Department of Infectious Diseases, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Oviedo University School of Medicine, Celestino Villamil s/n, 33006 Oviedo, Spain.

出版信息

Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2010 Mar;35(3):301-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2009.11.012. Epub 2009 Dec 31.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2009.11.012
PMID:20045289
Abstract

The efficacy of carbapenems versus cefotaxime (8g/day)+metronidazole (1.5-2g/day) [combined standard chemotherapy (CSC)] for the treatment of brain abscess was compared. Fifty-nine adult patients with brain abscesses received either imipenem or meropenem (3-4g/day) or CSC for a mean of 5 weeks, in addition to neurosurgery in most cases. Cure was obtained in 84.7% of cases; 42/47 (89.4%) on carbapenems [18/22 (81.8%) on imipenem versus 24/25 (96.0%) on meropenem] and 8/12 (66.7%) on CSC (P=0.06). Seven patients with multiple abscesses were treated with imipenem (1 died; cure rate 85.7%), five with meropenem (all survived; cure rate 100%) and five with CSC (2 died; cure rate 60%) (P<0.4). Neurosurgery was performed in 43/59 cases (72.9%); 17 (77.3%) in the imipenem group, 21 (84.0%) in the meropenem group and 5 (41.7%) in the CSC group (P=0.02). There was no significant difference in the rate of relapse requiring re-intervention. Treatment with meropenem was associated with a lower mortality than CSC (P=0.026). Seizures were observed only with carbapenems [8/22 (36.4%) for imipenem versus 2/25 (8.0%) for meropenem; P=0.03]. Carbapenems were more effective than CSC for treatment of brain abscesses. Because meropenem induced significantly fewer seizures than imipenem with at least the same clinical efficacy, the former appears to be a better choice to treat this infection.

摘要

比较了碳青霉烯类药物与头孢噻肟(8g/天)+甲硝唑(1.5-2g/天)[联合标准化疗(CSC)]治疗脑脓肿的疗效。59 例成人脑脓肿患者除了神经外科手术外,大多数患者还接受了亚胺培南或美罗培南(3-4g/天)或 CSC 治疗,平均 5 周。84.7%的病例获得治愈;47 例碳青霉烯类药物中 42 例(89.4%)[22 例亚胺培南中 18 例(81.8%),25 例美罗培南中 24 例(96.0%)],12 例 CSC 中 8 例(66.7%)(P=0.06)。7 例多发性脓肿患者接受了亚胺培南治疗(1 例死亡;治愈率 85.7%),5 例接受了美罗培南治疗(全部存活;治愈率 100%),5 例接受了 CSC 治疗(2 例死亡;治愈率 60%)(P<0.4)。43/59 例(72.9%)患者接受了神经外科手术;22 例亚胺培南组中 17 例(77.3%),25 例美罗培南组中 21 例(84.0%),12 例 CSC 组中 5 例(41.7%)(P=0.02)。需要再次干预的复发率无显著差异。美罗培南治疗的死亡率低于 CSC(P=0.026)。只有碳青霉烯类药物才观察到癫痫发作[22 例亚胺培南中 8 例(36.4%),25 例美罗培南中 2 例(8.0%);P=0.03]。碳青霉烯类药物治疗脑脓肿的疗效优于 CSC。由于美罗培南引起的癫痫发作明显少于亚胺培南,且具有相同的临床疗效,因此前者似乎是治疗这种感染的更好选择。

相似文献

1
Meropenem monotherapy is as effective as and safer than imipenem to treat brain abscesses.美罗培南单药治疗与亚胺培南治疗脑脓肿的疗效相当,且安全性更高。
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2010 Mar;35(3):301-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2009.11.012. Epub 2009 Dec 31.
2
Efficacy and tolerability of IV doripenem versus meropenem in adults with complicated intra-abdominal infection: a phase III, prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, noninferiority study.静脉注射多黏菌素B与美罗培南治疗成人复杂性腹腔内感染的疗效和耐受性:一项III期、前瞻性、多中心、随机、双盲、非劣效性研究。
Clin Ther. 2008 May;30(5):868-83. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2008.04.019.
3
Meropenem versus imipenem/cilastatin in the treatment of sepsis in Chinese patients.美罗培南与亚胺培南/西司他丁治疗中国患者脓毒症的疗效比较
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi (Taipei). 2000 May;63(5):361-7.
4
Multicenter randomized trial comparing meropenem (1.5 g daily) and imipenem/cilastatin (2 g daily) in the hospital treatment of community-acquired pneumonia.多中心随机试验比较美罗培南(每日1.5克)与亚胺培南/西司他丁(每日2克)用于医院治疗社区获得性肺炎的疗效。
Drugs Exp Clin Res. 1999;25(6):243-52.
5
A randomized, controlled clinical trial on meropenem versus imipenem/cilastatin for the treatment of bacterial infections.美罗培南与亚胺培南/西司他丁治疗细菌感染的随机对照临床试验
Chin Med J (Engl). 2002 Dec;115(12):1849-54.
6
Is it safe to use carbapenems in patients with a history of allergy to penicillin?对青霉素有过敏史的患者使用碳青霉烯类药物是否安全?
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2004 Dec;54(6):1155-7. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkh454. Epub 2004 Oct 14.
7
Imipenem therapy of brain abscesses.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1996 Aug;15(8):653-7. doi: 10.1007/BF01691152.
8
Cefozopran, meropenem, or imipenem-cilastatin compared with cefepime as empirical therapy in febrile neutropenic adult patients: A multicenter prospective randomized trial.头孢唑兰、美罗培南或亚胺培南-西司他丁与头孢吡肟作为发热性中性粒细胞减少成年患者经验性治疗的比较:一项多中心前瞻性随机试验。
J Infect Chemother. 2015 Jan;21(1):16-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2014.08.026. Epub 2014 Sep 17.
9
Efficacy and safety of intravenous infusion of doripenem versus imipenem in ventilator-associated pneumonia: a multicenter, randomized study.多利培南与亚胺培南静脉输注治疗呼吸机相关性肺炎的疗效与安全性:一项多中心随机研究
Crit Care Med. 2008 Apr;36(4):1089-96. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181691b99.
10
Activity of cefepime and carbapenems in experimental pneumonia caused by porin-deficient Klebsiella pneumoniae producing FOX-5 beta-lactamase.头孢吡肟和碳青霉烯类药物对产FOX-5β-内酰胺酶的孔蛋白缺陷型肺炎克雷伯菌所致实验性肺炎的活性。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2005 Jan;11(1):31-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2004.01018.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Single-center experience and evaluation of rare ıntracranial abscesses in childhood.儿童罕见颅内脓肿的单中心经验与评估
Ital J Pediatr. 2025 Feb 7;51(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s13052-025-01895-y.
2
Subdural Empyema as a Sequela of Severe Erosive Sinusitis: A Case Report.严重侵蚀性鼻窦炎后遗症之硬脑膜下积脓:病例报告
Cureus. 2024 Aug 24;16(8):e67690. doi: 10.7759/cureus.67690. eCollection 2024 Aug.
3
Outcome of management of brain abscess in children.儿童脑脓肿的治疗结果
Pak J Med Sci. 2020 Mar-Apr;36(3):306-309. doi: 10.12669/pjms.36.3.1087.
4
CONSORT: May stereotactic intracavity administration of antibiotics shorten the course of systemic antibiotic therapy for brain abscesses?CONSORT:立体定向腔内给予抗生素能否缩短脑脓肿全身抗生素治疗的疗程?
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 May;96(21):e6359. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000006359.
5
Evaluation of Ertapenem use with impact assessment on extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBL) production and gram-negative resistance in Singapore General Hospital (SGH).评价厄他培南的使用,并对新加坡中央医院(SGH)产超广谱β-内酰胺酶(ESBL)和革兰氏阴性耐药的影响进行评估。
BMC Infect Dis. 2013 Nov 6;13:523. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-13-523.
6
Brain abscess: Current management.脑脓肿:当前的治疗方法。
J Neurosci Rural Pract. 2013 Aug;4(Suppl 1):S67-81. doi: 10.4103/0976-3147.116472.
7
Pyogenic brain abscess, a 15 year survey.化脓性脑脓肿,15 年调查。
BMC Infect Dis. 2012 Nov 30;12:332. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-12-332.
8
Inflammatory index and treatment of brain abscess.脑脓肿的炎症指标与治疗
Nagoya J Med Sci. 2012 Aug;74(3-4):313-24.