不同加压带压力值对加压疗法治疗静脉性腿部溃疡愈合的影响。

The influence of different sub-bandage pressure values on venous leg ulcers healing when treated with compression therapy.

机构信息

Clinic for Vascular Surgery, Clinical Centre Nis, Vascular Department, Nis, Serbia.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg. 2010 Mar;51(3):655-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2009.10.042. Epub 2010 Jan 4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Venous leg ulcers (VLU) have a huge social and economic impact. An estimated 1.5% of European adults will suffer a venous ulcer at some point in their lives. Despite the widespread use of bandaging with high pressure in the treatment of this condition, recurrence rates range between 25% to 70%. Numerous studies have suggested that the compression system should provide sub-bandage pressure values in the range from 35 mm Hg to 45 mm Hg in order to achieve the best possible healing results.

METHODS

An open, randomized, prospective, single-center study was performed in order to determine the healing rates of VLU when treated with different compression systems and different sub-bandage pressure values. One hundred thirty-one patients (72 women, 59 men; mean age, 59-years-old) with VLU (ulcer surface >3 cm(2); duration >3 months) were randomized into three groups: group A - 42 patients who were treated using an open-toed, elastic, class III compression device knitted in tubular form (Tubulcus, Laboratoires Innothera, Arcueil, France); group B - 46 patients treated with the multi-component bandaging system comprised of Tubulcus and one elastic bandage (15 cm wide and 5 cm long with 200% stretch, Niva, Novi Sad, Serbia); and group C - forty-three patients treated with the multi-component bandaging system comprised of Tubulcus and two elastic bandages. Pressure measurements were taken with the Kikuhime device (TT MediTrade, Soro, Denmark) at the B1 measuring point in the supine, sitting, and standing positions under the three different compression systems.

RESULTS

The median resting values in the supine and standing positions in examined study groups were as follows: group A - 36.2 mm Hg and 43.9 mm Hg; group B - 53.9 mm Hg and 68.2 mm Hg; group C - 74.0 mm Hg and 87.4 mm Hg. The healing rate during the 26-week treatment period was 25% (13/42) in group A, 67.4% (31/46) in group B, and 74.4% (32/43) in group C. The success of compression treatment in group A was strongly associated with the small ulcer surface (<5 cm(2)) and smaller calf circumference (CC; <38 cm). On the other hand, compliance in group A was good. In groups B and C, compliance was poor in patients with small CC, but the healing rate was high, especially in patients with large ulcers and a large CC (>43 cm).

CONCLUSION

The results obtained in this study indicate that better healing results are achieved with two or multi-component compression systems than with single-component compression systems and that a compression system should be individually determined for each patient according to individual characteristics of the leg and CC. Target sub-bandage pressure value (B1 measuring point in the sitting position) of the compression system needed for the ulcer healing could be determined according to a simple formula, CC + CC/2.

摘要

背景

静脉性腿部溃疡(VLU)具有巨大的社会和经济影响。据估计,欧洲成年人中有 1.5%的人在其一生中的某个时刻会患有静脉溃疡。尽管在治疗这种情况下广泛使用高压绷带包扎,但复发率在 25%至 70%之间。许多研究表明,为了获得最佳愈合效果,压缩系统应提供 35 毫米汞柱至 45 毫米汞柱范围内的亚绷带压力值。

方法

为了确定不同压缩系统和不同亚绷带压力值治疗 VLU 的愈合率,进行了一项开放、随机、前瞻性、单中心研究。131 名 VLU 患者(72 名女性,59 名男性;平均年龄 59 岁)(溃疡面积>3cm2;病程>3 个月)被随机分为三组:A 组-42 名患者使用开放式、弹性、III 级压缩装置治疗管状编织(Tubulcus,Laboratoires Innothera,Arcueil,法国);B 组-46 名患者用多组件绷带系统治疗,包括 Tubulcus 和一条弹性绷带(15cm 宽,5cm 长,拉伸率 200%,Niva,Novi Sad,塞尔维亚);C 组-43 名患者用多组件绷带系统治疗,包括 Tubulcus 和两条弹性绷带。使用 Kikuhime 设备(TT MediTrade,Soro,丹麦)在三种不同的压缩系统下,在仰卧、坐姿和站立位置的 B1 测量点测量压力。

结果

在检查的研究组中,仰卧和站立时的中位静息值如下:A 组-36.2mmHg 和 43.9mmHg;B 组-53.9mmHg 和 68.2mmHg;C 组-74.0mmHg 和 87.4mmHg。在 26 周的治疗期间,A 组的愈合率为 25%(13/42),B 组为 67.4%(31/46),C 组为 74.4%(32/43)。A 组压缩治疗的成功与溃疡面积较小(<5cm2)和小腿周长(CC;<38cm)密切相关。另一方面,A 组的依从性良好。在 B 组和 C 组中,CC 较小的患者依从性较差,但愈合率较高,尤其是 CC 较大(>43cm)的患者。

结论

本研究结果表明,与单组件压缩系统相比,双组件或多组件压缩系统可获得更好的愈合效果,应根据腿部和 CC 的个体特征为每位患者单独确定压缩系统。根据一个简单的公式,即 CC+CC/2,可以确定用于溃疡愈合的压缩系统的目标亚绷带压力值(坐姿下的 B1 测量点)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索