Glasner Tina, van der Vaart Wander
Department of Social Research Methodology, Faculty of Social Sciences, VU University Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1081, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Qual Quant. 2009 May;43(3):333-349. doi: 10.1007/s11135-007-9129-8. Epub 2007 Oct 5.
Retrospective reports in survey interviews and questionnaires are subject to many types of recall error, which affect completeness, consistency, and dating accuracy. Concerns about this problem have led to the development of so-called calendar instruments, or timeline techniques. These aided recall procedures have been designed to help respondents gain better access to long-term memory by providing a graphical time frame in which life history information can be represented. In order to obtain more insights into the potential benefits of calendar methodology, this paper presents a review of the application of calendar instruments, their design characteristics and effects on data quality. Calendar techniques are currently used in a variety of fields, including life course research, epidemiology and family planning studies. Despite the growing interest in these new methods, their application often lacks sufficient theoretical foundation and little attention has been paid to their effectiveness. Several recent studies however, have demonstrated that in comparison to more traditional survey methods, calendar techniques can improve some aspects of data quality. While calendar instruments have been shown to be potentially beneficial to retrospective data quality, there is an apparent need for methodological research that generates more systematic knowledge about their application in social surveys.
调查访谈和问卷中的回顾性报告容易出现多种回忆误差,这些误差会影响完整性、一致性和日期准确性。对这一问题的担忧促使了所谓的日历工具或时间线技术的发展。这些辅助回忆程序旨在通过提供一个可以呈现生活史信息的图形时间框架,帮助受访者更好地回忆长期记忆。为了更深入了解日历方法的潜在益处,本文对日历工具的应用、其设计特点以及对数据质量的影响进行了综述。日历技术目前应用于多个领域,包括生命历程研究、流行病学和计划生育研究。尽管人们对这些新方法的兴趣日益浓厚,但其应用往往缺乏足够的理论基础,且很少有人关注其有效性。然而,最近的几项研究表明,与更传统的调查方法相比,日历技术可以提高数据质量的某些方面。虽然日历工具已被证明对回顾性数据质量可能有益,但显然需要进行方法学研究,以产生更多关于其在社会调查中应用的系统知识。