Suppr超能文献

用于评估职业史的基于图标/日历的问卷的重测信度。

Test-retest reliability of an icon/calendar-based questionnaire used to assess occupational history.

作者信息

Engel L S, Keifer M C, Thompson M L, Zahm S H

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.

出版信息

Am J Ind Med. 2001 Nov;40(5):512-22. doi: 10.1002/ajim.1119.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Self-reported work histories can be critical for both epidemiologic and clinical purposes. However, the complexity of some work histories, such as those of migrant farm workers, can hamper recall, resulting in inaccurate reporting. Memory aids may reduce such error. This study assesses the reliability of work histories collected using such aids in the form of an icon/calendar-based questionnaire.

METHODS

Thirty-one males engaged in farmwork and other manual labor for a median 28 years (range: 10-64) were interviewed twice, 8-14 months apart, about their lifetime employment. In each interview, subjects were asked about important life events, which were recorded with icons on a calendar. They were then asked to recount their work history, including for each job the tasks, crops or products handled, starting and ending dates, and location. This information was recorded, job-by-job, on the calendar with icons.

RESULTS

Interquestionnaire agreement of cumulative reported employment duration (as measured by the correlation coefficient) was moderate to high across all time periods for certain crops (e.g., r = 0.69-0.92 for apple-related work), by location (e.g., r = 0.76-0.95 for Washington State), and for agricultural work in general (r = 0.67-0.94), but was lower for specific tasks. Agreement of job counts was high for total work history for certain crops (e.g., r = 0.93 for apple-related work), by location (e.g., r = 0.90 for Washington State), and for agricultural work in general (r = 0.89), but paradoxically decreased with proximity to the interview date. Agreement of both measures tended to be highest for those tasks and crops in which subjects reported spending the most time. Categorization of subjects into tertiles on the basis of either cumulative duration or counts produced results similar to those observed for job counts.

CONCLUSIONS

The icon-calendar questionnaire is an effective tool for estimating cumulative duration of certain work categorizations among subjects with complex work histories.

摘要

背景

自我报告的工作经历对于流行病学和临床目的而言都可能至关重要。然而,某些工作经历的复杂性,比如流动农场工人的工作经历,可能会妨碍回忆,导致报告不准确。记忆辅助工具或许可以减少此类误差。本研究评估了使用基于图标/日历的问卷这种辅助工具收集的工作经历的可靠性。

方法

对31名从事农场工作及其他体力劳动、工作年限中位数为28年(范围:10 - 64年)的男性进行了两次访谈,两次访谈间隔8 - 14个月,询问他们一生的就业情况。在每次访谈中,向受试者询问重要生活事件,并用日历上的图标进行记录。然后要求他们讲述自己的工作经历,包括每份工作的任务、所处理的作物或产品、开始和结束日期以及工作地点。这些信息逐份工作地用日历上的图标进行记录。

结果

对于某些作物(如与苹果相关工作,r = 0.69 - 0.92)、按地点(如华盛顿州,r = 0.76 - 0.95)以及总体农业工作(r = 0.67 - 0.94),所有时间段内累计报告就业时长的问卷间一致性(通过相关系数衡量)为中等至高,但特定任务的一致性较低。对于某些作物(如与苹果相关工作,r = 0.93)、按地点(如华盛顿州,r = 0.90)以及总体农业工作(r = 0.89),工作计数的一致性较高,但矛盾的是,随着离访谈日期越近,一致性降低。对于受试者报告花费时间最多的那些任务和作物,这两种测量方法的一致性往往最高。根据累计时长或计数将受试者分为三分位数,得出的结果与工作计数观察到的结果相似。

结论

图标 - 日历问卷是一种有效工具,可用于估计工作经历复杂的受试者中某些工作分类的累计时长。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验