Suppr超能文献

比较传统问卷与基于图标/日历的问卷以评估职业史。

Comparison of a traditional questionnaire with an icon/calendar-based questionnaire to assess occupational history.

作者信息

Engel L S, Keifer M C, Zahm S H

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.

出版信息

Am J Ind Med. 2001 Nov;40(5):502-11. doi: 10.1002/ajim.1118.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Self-reported work histories are an essential tool for estimating exposure in many occupational epidemiologic studies. However, the transience of some occupations such as farm work can hamper recall, resulting in inaccurate reporting. To address this problem, we have developed an icon/calendar-based questionnaire. This study compares work histories collected via this questionnaire to those collected via a traditional questionnaire.

METHODS

Eighty-nine farmworkers and non-farmworkers were interviewed twice, 8-10 months apart, about their lifetime employment. In the first interview, subjects were asked to recount their entire work history, starting from the interview date and moving backwards in time ("traditional questionnaire"). In the second interview, subjects were first asked about important life events, which were recorded with icons on a calendar. They were then asked to recount their work history, which was recorded, job-by-job, on the calendar with icons ("icon-calendar questionnaire").

RESULTS

Number of jobs and amount of work time accounted for since first employment were significantly greater using the icon-calendar questionnaire than the traditional questionnaire, the disparity increasing with time from the date of interview. The ratio of number of jobs in the traditional questionnaire to number of jobs in the icon-calendar questionnaire decreased from 100.0% in the most recent time period to 0.0% in the earliest time period. While the percentage of time explained by employment remained relatively constant across time periods in the icon-calendar questionnaire, ranging from 86.3 to 98.9%, it rapidly decreased with time in the traditional questionnaire, from 77.9% in the most recent time period to 0.0% in the earliest time period.

CONCLUSIONS

The icon-calendar questionnaire was more effective than the traditional questionnaire for obtaining complex work histories during interviews, producing a more complete picture of a person's work history.

摘要

背景

在许多职业流行病学研究中,自我报告的工作经历是估计暴露情况的重要工具。然而,某些职业(如农业工作)的短暂性会妨碍回忆,导致报告不准确。为了解决这个问题,我们开发了一种基于图标/日历的问卷。本研究比较了通过该问卷收集的工作经历与通过传统问卷收集的工作经历。

方法

对89名农场工人和非农场工人进行了两次访谈,间隔8 - 10个月,询问他们的终身就业情况。在第一次访谈中,要求受试者从访谈日期开始,倒叙讲述他们的整个工作经历(“传统问卷”)。在第二次访谈中,首先询问受试者重要的生活事件,并用日历上的图标记录下来。然后要求他们讲述工作经历,在日历上逐份工作地用图标记录(“图标 - 日历问卷”)。

结果

使用图标 - 日历问卷自首次就业以来记录的工作数量和工作时间显著多于传统问卷,这种差异随着离访谈日期的时间增加而增大。传统问卷中的工作数量与图标 - 日历问卷中的工作数量之比从最近时间段的100.0%降至最早时间段的0.0%。虽然在图标 - 日历问卷中,各时间段就业所解释的时间百分比相对稳定,在86.3%至98.9%之间,但在传统问卷中,该百分比随时间迅速下降,从最近时间段的77.9%降至最早时间段的0.0%。

结论

在访谈中获取复杂的工作经历时,图标 - 日历问卷比传统问卷更有效,能更全面地呈现一个人的工作经历。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验