Natarajan Loki
University of California, San Diego, USA.
Int J Biostat. 2009;5(1):Article 12. doi: 10.2202/1557-4679.1143.
Epidemiologic research focuses on estimating exposure-disease associations. In some applications the exposure may be dichotomized, for instance when threshold levels of the exposure are of primary public health interest (e.g., consuming 5 or more fruits and vegetables per day may reduce cancer risk). Errors in exposure variables are known to yield biased regression coefficients in exposure-disease models. Methods for bias-correction with continuous mismeasured exposures have been extensively discussed, and are often based on validation substudies, where the "true" and imprecise exposures are observed on a small subsample. In this paper, we focus on biases associated with dichotomization of a mismeasured continuous exposure. The amount of bias, in relation to measurement error in the imprecise continuous predictor, and choice of dichotomization cut point are discussed. Measurement error correction via regression calibration is developed for this scenario, and compared to naïvely using the dichotomized mismeasured predictor in linear exposure-disease models. Properties of the measurement error correction method (i.e., bias, mean-squared error) are assessed via simulations.
流行病学研究专注于估计暴露与疾病之间的关联。在某些应用中,暴露可能会被二分法分类,例如当暴露的阈值水平是主要的公共卫生关注点时(例如,每天食用5份或更多水果和蔬菜可能会降低患癌风险)。已知暴露变量中的误差会在暴露 - 疾病模型中产生有偏差的回归系数。针对连续测量错误的暴露进行偏差校正的方法已被广泛讨论,并且通常基于验证子研究,即在一个小的子样本上观察到“真实”和不精确的暴露情况。在本文中,我们关注与测量错误的连续暴露二分法相关的偏差。讨论了与不精确连续预测变量中的测量误差相关的偏差量以及二分法切点的选择。针对这种情况开发了通过回归校准进行测量误差校正的方法,并将其与在线性暴露 - 疾病模型中天真地使用二分法测量错误的预测变量进行比较。通过模拟评估测量误差校正方法的属性(即偏差、均方误差)。