Gerrig Richard J, Love Jessica, McKoon Gail
Stony Brook University.
J Mem Lang. 2009 Jan 1;60(1):144-153. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2008.08.004.
When readers experience narratives they often encounter small mysteries-questions that a text raises that are not immediately settled. In our experiments, participants read stories that introduced characters by proper names (e.g., "It's just that Brandon hasn't called in so long"). Resolved versions of the stories specified the functions those characters' assumed in their narrative worlds with respect to the other characters (e.g., Brandon was identified as the speaker's grandson); unresolved versions of the stories did not immediately provide that information. We predicted that characters whose functions were still unresolved would remain relatively accessible in the discourse representations. We tested that prediction in Experiments 1 and 2 by asking participants to indicate whether a name (e.g., Brandon) had appeared in the story. Participants responded most swiftly when the characters remained unresolved. In the latter experiments, we demonstrated that the presence of an unresolved character disrupted processing of information that followed that character's introduction (Experiment 3) but not information that preceded that introduction (Experiment 4). These results support the general importance of providing a theoretical account of readers' responses to narrative mysteries.
当读者阅读叙事作品时,他们常常会遇到一些小谜团——文本提出的问题,这些问题不会立即得到解决。在我们的实验中,参与者阅读的故事通过专有名称来介绍人物(例如,“只是布兰登很久没有打电话来了”)。故事的已解决版本明确了这些人物在其叙事世界中相对于其他人物所承担的功能(例如,布兰登被确定为讲述者的孙子);故事的未解决版本没有立即提供该信息。我们预测,其功能仍未解决的人物在话语表征中会保持相对易获取的状态。我们在实验1和实验2中通过要求参与者指出一个名字(例如,布兰登)是否出现在故事中来检验这一预测。当人物仍未解决时,参与者的反应最为迅速。在后面的实验中,我们证明,未解决人物的出现会干扰在该人物被引入之后的信息处理(实验3),但不会干扰在该引入之前的信息处理(实验4)。这些结果支持了为读者对叙事谜团的反应提供理论解释的总体重要性。