Suppr超能文献

在单次脊髓麻醉期间,针诱导的感觉异常:坐位与侧卧位的比较。

Needle-induced paresthesiae during single-shot spinal anesthesia: a comparison of sitting versus lateral decubitus position.

机构信息

Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.

出版信息

Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2010 Jan-Feb;35(1):41-4. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e3181c757c8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Paresthesiae occasionally occur during spinal puncture or injection of local anesthetic for spinal anesthesia. No information is currently available regarding the effects of the patient's position on the incidence of needle-induced paresthesiae. The purpose of this prospective, observational study was to compare the occurrence of needle-induced paresthesiae in patients who received single-shot spinal anesthesia in the sitting position or in the lateral decubitus position.

METHODS

A total of 620 patients operated on under spinal anesthesia were included. Spinal anesthesia was performed in the sitting position in 142 patients and in the lateral decubitus position in 478 patients. All blocks were performed with a 25-gauge, 90-mm, Sprotte needle, at the L3-L4 or L4-L5 level. Patients' demographics, patients' position (lateral decubitus or sitting), number of skin punctures, incidence of paresthesiae, and success of the anesthesia were recorded.

RESULTS

The overall incidence of paresthesiae was higher in the lateral decubitus position (16.95%) compared with the sitting position (9.15%) (P = 0.0230). The number of punctures and the success rate were similar in both positions. Studying the incidence of paresthesiae for each position, when performing 1 or more punctures, there was no position-related difference noted if a single-needle puncture was sufficient to perform the block (8.0% in the lateral decubitus group versus 5.1% in the sitting group) (P = 0.3305). This difference between positions was significant when more than a single-needle puncture was required (34.1% in the lateral decubitus group versus 18.6% in the sitting group) (P = 0.0497).

CONCLUSIONS

Patient's position may influence the occurrence of needle-induced paresthesiae during spinal anesthesia. Lateral decubitus position resulted in a higher incidence of paresthesiae than the sitting position. However, there is no position-related difference noted if a single-needle puncture is sufficient to perform the block.

摘要

背景和目的

脊髓穿刺或局部麻醉注射进行脊髓麻醉时偶尔会出现感觉异常。目前尚无关于患者体位对针诱导感觉异常发生率影响的信息。本前瞻性观察研究的目的是比较接受单次脊髓麻醉的患者在坐位和侧卧位时发生针诱导感觉异常的情况。

方法

共纳入 620 例接受脊髓麻醉的患者。142 例患者在坐位行脊髓麻醉,478 例患者在侧卧位行脊髓麻醉。所有阻滞均采用 25 号、90mm 的 Sprotte 针在 L3-L4 或 L4-L5 水平进行。记录患者的人口统计学特征、患者体位(侧卧位或坐位)、皮肤穿刺次数、感觉异常的发生率以及麻醉的成功率。

结果

侧卧位时感觉异常的总发生率(16.95%)高于坐位(9.15%)(P = 0.0230)。两种体位的穿刺次数和成功率相似。研究每个体位的感觉异常发生率,如果单次穿刺即可完成阻滞,那么两种体位之间无差异(侧卧位组为 8.0%,坐位组为 5.1%)(P = 0.3305)。如果需要多次穿刺,则两种体位之间存在显著差异(侧卧位组为 34.1%,坐位组为 18.6%)(P = 0.0497)。

结论

患者体位可能会影响脊髓麻醉期间针诱导感觉异常的发生。侧卧位比坐位更容易出现感觉异常。然而,如果单次穿刺即可完成阻滞,则两种体位之间无差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验