Suppr超能文献

将上腔静脉综合征作为起搏器植入并发症进行管理:临床实践的汇总分析

Managing superior vena cava syndrome as a complication of pacemaker implantation: a pooled analysis of clinical practice.

作者信息

Riley Robert F, Petersen Steffen E, Ferguson John D, Bashir Yaver

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, University of Washington Affiliated Hospitals, Seattle, Washington.

出版信息

Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2010 Apr;33(4):420-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2009.02613.x. Epub 2009 Dec 28.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Superior vena cava syndrome (SVCS) is a rare complication of pacemaker implantation. Numerous methods have been employed to treat this condition, ranging from anticoagulation and thrombolysis to surgical interventions and stenting. However, thus far only small case series have been reported and there is no currently accepted standard of care.

METHODS

Our group preformed a PubMed literature search to identify cases of symptomatic SVCS that developed following implantation of permanent pacemakers or implanatable cardioverter defibrillators and were treated with one of five different modalities: anticoagulation, thrombolysis, venoplasty, stenting, and surgical reconstuction. Duration of follow-up and incidence of recurrence of symptoms were the main end-points.

RESULTS

One hundred and four eligible cases from 74 different publications were identified, in which SVCS presented at a median of 48 (range 0-396) months after device implantation. We found that over the last 40 years, conservative treatments have been replaced by surgical reconstruction, and most recently by stenting, as the most common therapeutic modality employed. Anticoagulation, thrombolysis, and venoplasty alone were all associated with high recurrence rates. Surgery and stenting were more successful: recurrence rates were 12% and 5% over a median follow-up of 16 (range: 2-179) and 9.5 (range: 2-60) months, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Currently, transvenous stenting is the most common treatment used for pacemaker-related SVCS, usually with conservation of the implanted leads. Both surgery and stenting appear to be effective treatments, with low incidences of recurrent SVCS over the first 12 months, but there is unfortunately a paucity of data on long-term outcomes. (PACE 2010; 420-425).

摘要

背景

上腔静脉综合征(SVCS)是起搏器植入术的一种罕见并发症。治疗该病症已采用了多种方法,从抗凝和溶栓到手术干预及支架置入。然而,迄今为止仅报道了小病例系列,目前尚无公认的治疗标准。

方法

我们团队进行了一项PubMed文献检索,以确定在植入永久性起搏器或植入式心脏复律除颤器后出现症状性SVCS并接受以下五种不同治疗方式之一的病例:抗凝、溶栓、静脉成形术、支架置入和手术重建。随访时间和症状复发率是主要终点。

结果

从74篇不同出版物中识别出104例符合条件的病例,其中SVCS在设备植入后的中位时间为48(范围0 - 396)个月出现。我们发现,在过去40年中,保守治疗已被手术重建所取代,最近又被支架置入所取代,成为最常用的治疗方式。单独的抗凝、溶栓和静脉成形术均与高复发率相关。手术和支架置入更成功:在中位随访16(范围:2 - 179)个月和9.5(范围:2 - 60)个月时,复发率分别为12%和5%。

结论

目前,经静脉支架置入是用于起搏器相关SVCS的最常见治疗方法,通常保留植入的导线。手术和支架置入似乎都是有效的治疗方法,在最初12个月内SVCS复发率较低,但遗憾的是关于长期结果的数据很少。(《PACE》2010年;420 - 425页)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验