Suppr超能文献

精神科护士补充处方与独立医疗处方的临床效果和成本比较:后测试对照组研究。

A comparison of the clinical effectiveness and costs of mental health nurse supplementary prescribing and independent medical prescribing: a post-test control group study.

机构信息

King's College London, Division of Health and Social Care Research, London SE1 8WA, UK.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2010 Jan 5;10:4. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-10-4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Supplementary prescribing for mental health nurses was first introduced in the UK in 2003. Since then, a number of studies have reported stakeholders' perceptions of the success of the initiative. However, there has been little experimental research conducted into its effectiveness. This paper reports findings from the first known study to compare the cost and clinical impact of mental health nurse supplementary prescribing to independent medical prescribing.

METHODS

A post-test control group experimental design was used to compare the treatment costs, clinical outcomes and satisfaction of patients in receipt of mental health nurse supplementary prescribing with a matched group of patients in receipt of independent prescribing from consultant psychiatrists. The sample comprised 45 patients in receipt of mental health nurse supplementary prescribing for a minimum of six months and a matched group (by age, gender, diagnosis, and chronicity) of patients prescribed for by psychiatrists.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between patients in the nurse supplementary prescribers' group and the independent prescribers' group in terms of medication adherence, health status, side effects, and satisfaction with overall care. Total costs per patient for service use were 803 pounds higher for the nurse prescribers' group but this difference was not significant (95% confidence interval--1341 pounds to 3020 pounds).

CONCLUSIONS

No significant differences were found between the health and social outcomes of patients in the mental health nurse supplementary prescribers' group, and those prescribed for by the independent medical prescribers. The cost appraisal also showed that there was no significant difference in the costs of the two types of prescribing, although the pattern of resources used differed between patients in the two prescriber groups. The results suggest that mental health nurse supplementary prescribers can deliver similar health benefits to patients as consultant psychiatrists without any significant difference in patients' service utilisation costs.

摘要

背景

精神科护士的补充处方于 2003 年在英国首次引入。自那时以来,许多研究报告了利益相关者对该倡议成功的看法。然而,对其有效性进行的实验研究很少。本文报告了首次对精神科护士补充处方与独立医疗处方的成本和临床效果进行比较的研究结果。

方法

采用后测对照实验设计,比较接受精神科护士补充处方治疗至少 6 个月的 45 名患者与接受顾问精神科医生独立处方治疗的匹配组患者的治疗费用、临床结局和满意度。

结果

在药物依从性、健康状况、副作用和对整体护理的满意度方面,护士补充处方组和独立处方组的患者之间没有显著差异。护士处方组的每位患者的服务使用总成本比独立处方组高 803 英镑,但差异无统计学意义(95%置信区间:1341 英镑至 3020 英镑)。

结论

精神科护士补充处方组和独立医疗处方组患者的健康和社会结局没有显著差异。成本评估还表明,两种处方类型的成本没有显著差异,尽管两组患者的资源使用模式不同。结果表明,精神科护士补充处方者可以为患者提供与顾问精神科医生相似的健康益处,而患者的服务利用成本没有显著差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2974/2820038/d60d9322d6bb/1472-6963-10-4-1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验