Suppr超能文献

采用效应量的荟萃分析比较成人注意缺陷多动障碍药物的疗效。

A comparison of the efficacy of medications for adult attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder using meta-analysis of effect sizes.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, SUNY Upstate Medical University, 750 East Adams St, Syracuse, NY 13210, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Psychiatry. 2010 Jun;71(6):754-63. doi: 10.4088/JCP.08m04902pur. Epub 2009 Dec 29.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Medications used to treat attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in adults have been well researched, but comparisons among drugs are hindered by the absence of direct comparative trials. Our objectives were to (1) estimate the effect size of the medications used to treat adult ADHD, (2) determine if differences in the designs of studies confound comparisons of medication efficacy, (3) quantify the evidence for differences in effect sizes among medications, and (4) see if features of study design influence estimates of efficacy.

DATA SOURCES

The following search engines were used: PubMed, Ovid, ERIC, CINAHL, MEDLINE, PREMEDLINE, the Cochrane database, e-psyche, and Social Sciences Abstracts. Presentations from the American Psychiatric Association and American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry meetings were reviewed.

STUDY SELECTION

A literature search was conducted to identify double-blind, placebo-controlled studies of ADHD in adults published in English after 1979. Only trials that used DSM-III, -III-R, or -IV ADHD criteria and followed subjects for > or = 2 weeks were selected.

DATA EXTRACTION

Meta-analysis regression assessed the influence of medication type and study design features on medication effects.

RESULTS

Nineteen trials met criteria and were included in this meta-analysis. These trials studied 13 drugs using 18 different outcome measures of hyperactive, inattentive, or impulsive behavior. After trials were stratified on the class of drug studied (short-acting stimulant vs long-acting stimulant vs nonstimulant), significant differences in effect size were observed between stimulant and nonstimulant medications (P = .006 and P = .0001, respectively, for short- and long-acting stimulants vs nonstimulants), but the effect for short-acting stimulants was not significant after correcting for study design features. The effect sizes for each drug class were similar in magnitude to what we previously reported for medication treatment studies of children with ADHD. We found significant heterogeneity of effect sizes for short-acting stimulants (P < .001) but not for other medication groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Although both stimulant and nonstimulant medications are effective for treating ADHD in adults, stimulant medications show greater efficacy for the short durations of treatment characteristic of placebo-controlled studies. We found no significant differences between short- and long-acting stimulant medications. Study design features vary widely among studies and can confound indirect comparisons unless addressed statistically as we have done in this study.

摘要

目的

用于治疗成人注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)的药物已有充分研究,但由于缺乏直接比较试验,药物之间的比较受到阻碍。我们的目标是:(1)评估用于治疗成人 ADHD 的药物的效应大小,(2)确定研究设计的差异是否混淆药物疗效的比较,(3)量化药物之间效应大小差异的证据,(4)观察研究设计特征是否影响疗效的估计。

资料来源

使用了以下搜索引擎:PubMed、Ovid、ERIC、CINAHL、MEDLINE、PREMEDLINE、Cochrane 数据库、e-psyche 和社会科学文摘。审查了美国精神病学协会和美国儿童和青少年精神病学学会会议的报告。

研究选择

进行了文献检索,以确定 1979 年后发表的用英语撰写的治疗成人 ADHD 的双盲、安慰剂对照研究。仅选择使用 DSM-III、-III-R 或 -IV ADHD 标准并随访受试者>或=2 周的试验。

资料提取

荟萃分析回归评估了药物类型和研究设计特征对药物作用的影响。

结果

19 项试验符合标准并纳入本荟萃分析。这些试验研究了 13 种药物,使用了 18 种不同的多动、注意力不集中或冲动行为的结果测量。在按研究药物类别分层(短效兴奋剂与长效兴奋剂与非兴奋剂)后,观察到兴奋剂和非兴奋剂药物之间的效应大小存在显著差异(短效兴奋剂与非兴奋剂相比,P=.006 和 P=.0001;长效兴奋剂与非兴奋剂相比,P=.006 和 P=.0001),但在校正研究设计特征后,短效兴奋剂的作用不显著。每种药物类别的效应大小与我们之前报告的 ADHD 儿童药物治疗研究相似。我们发现短效兴奋剂的效应大小存在显著异质性(P<.001),但其他药物组没有。

结论

尽管兴奋剂和非兴奋剂药物对治疗成人 ADHD 均有效,但兴奋剂药物在安慰剂对照研究中治疗时间较短的情况下显示出更大的疗效。我们没有发现短效和长效兴奋剂药物之间的显著差异。研究设计特征在研究之间差异很大,如果不像我们在本研究中那样进行统计学处理,可能会混淆间接比较。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验