The Robert Graham Center, Washington, DC, USA.
J Am Board Fam Med. 2010 Jan-Feb;23(1):49-58. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2010.01.090101.
In its recent shift to a Maintenance of Certification for Family Physicians (MC-FP) paradigm, the American Board of Family Medicine provides diplomates completing 3 self-assessment modules (SAMs) in the first 3 years (or first stage of MC-FP) a pathway to extend their recertification cycle to 10 years provided additional requirements are met, versus a 7-year cycle for "non-completers." We use geographic information systems to report on variations in SAM participation and completion in a single cohort of diplomates followed during their first stage of MC-FP to better understand the communities impacted, barriers to uptake, and urban-rural differences.
We merged data from 2006 MC-FP files, association workforce files, and the US Census and completed cross-sectional spatial, descriptive, and regression analyses of the uptake and timely completion of SAMs during a 3-year period. Specifically, we explored characteristics of diplomates who did not meet first-stage MC-FP requirements within 3 years versus those who did.
The cohort comprised 10,812 participants who passed their certification or recertification examination in 2005, of which 30.5% did not complete their MC-FP requirements by the end of 2008. Noncompleters were more likely to be older (P < .01), men (P < .0001), and from areas of dense poverty (P < .01) and underserved areas (P < .05). There were no significant differences in MC-FP completion across the rural-urban continuum (P = .7108).
More than two-thirds of eligible, certified family physicians completed stage-one MC-FP requirements. Concerns that technical aspects of the new MC-FP paradigm would leave parts of a widely distributed, poorly resourced primary care workforce disadvantaged may hold true for providers in some underserved areas, but differential completion among rural and remote physicians was not found. Understanding barriers to uptake is essential if the specialty boards are to meet their obligations to the public to promote quality of care through Maintenance of Certification for all physicians.
美国家庭医学委员会最近转向以家庭医生维持认证(MC-FP)为模式,为在最初 3 年内完成 3 个自我评估模块(SAM)的专科医生提供了一条途径,如果满足其他要求,他们可以将重新认证周期延长至 10 年,而非完成者的周期为 7 年。我们使用地理信息系统来报告在 MC-FP 第一阶段接受随访的单一专科医生队列中 SAM 参与和完成情况的变化,以更好地了解受影响的社区、接受的障碍以及城乡差异。
我们合并了 2006 年 MC-FP 档案、协会劳动力档案和美国人口普查的数据,并对 3 年内 SAM 的参与和及时完成情况进行了横断面空间、描述性和回归分析。具体来说,我们探讨了在 3 年内未达到第一阶段 MC-FP 要求的专科医生与达到要求的专科医生的特征。
该队列包括 10812 名在 2005 年通过认证或重新认证考试的参与者,其中 30.5%的人在 2008 年底前未完成 MC-FP 的要求。未完成者更有可能年龄较大(P <.01)、男性(P <.0001)、处于人口稠密的贫困地区(P <.01)和服务不足地区(P <.05)。在农村-城市连续体中,MC-FP 的完成情况没有显著差异(P =.7108)。
超过三分之二的合格认证家庭医生完成了第一阶段的 MC-FP 要求。新的 MC-FP 模式的技术方面可能会使分布广泛、资源匮乏的初级保健劳动力中的一部分处于不利地位的担忧可能对一些服务不足地区的提供者来说是正确的,但在农村和偏远地区的医生中并没有发现差异完成。如果专业委员会要履行其向公众提供通过所有医生的维持认证来提高护理质量的义务,了解接受的障碍是至关重要的。