The Robert Graham Center for Policy Studies in Family Medicine and Primary Care, Washington, DC, USA.
Ann Fam Med. 2011 May-Jun;9(3):203-10. doi: 10.1370/afm.1251.
The American Board of Family Medicine has completed the 7-year transition of all of its diplomates into Maintenance of Certification (MOC). Participation in this voluntary process must be broad-based and balanced for MOC to have any practical national impact on health care. This study explores family physicians' geographic, demographic, and practice characteristics associated with the variations in MOC participation to examine whether MOC has potential as a viable mechanism for dissemination of information or for altering practice.
To investigate characteristics associated with differential participation in MOC by family physicians, we performed a cross-sectional comparison of all active family physicians using descriptive and multinomial logistic regression analyses.
Eighty-five percent of active family physicians in this study (n = 70,323) have current board certification. Ninety-one percent of all active board-certified family physicians eligible for MOC are participating in MOC. Physicians who work in poorer neighborhoods (odds ratio [OR] = 1.105; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.038-1.176), who are US-born or foreign-born international medical graduates (OR = 1.221; 95% CI, 1.124-1.326; OR = 1.444; 95% CI, 1.238-1.684, respectively), or who are solo practitioners (OR = 1.460; 95% CI, 1.345-1.585) are more likely to have missed initial MOC requirements than those from a large, undifferentiated reference group of certified family physicians. When age is held constant, female physicians are less likely to miss initial MOC requirements (OR = 0.849; 95% CI, 0.794-0.908). Physicians practicing in rural areas were found to be performing similarly in meeting initial MOC requirements to those in urban areas (OR = 0.966; 95% CI, 0.919-1.015, not significant).
Large numbers of family physicians are participating in MOC. The significant association between practicing in underserved areas and lapsed board certification, however, warrants more research examining causes of differential participation. The penetrance of MOC engagement shows that MOC has the potential to convey substantial practice-relevant medical information to physicians. Thus, it offers a potential channel through which to improve health care knowledge and medical practice.
美国家庭医学委员会已经完成了其所有专科医生的 7 年的认证维持(MOC)过渡。为了使 MOC 对医疗保健产生任何实际的全国性影响,这种自愿参与必须具有广泛的基础和平衡。本研究探讨了家庭医生的地理、人口统计学和实践特征与 MOC 参与的变化相关,以检查 MOC 是否有可能成为传播信息或改变实践的可行机制。
为了调查家庭医生 MOC 参与差异相关的特征,我们对所有现役家庭医生进行了横断面比较,采用描述性和多项逻辑回归分析。
本研究中 85%(n=70323)的现役家庭医生具有当前的委员会认证。所有符合 MOC 条件的现役委员会认证家庭医生中,91%正在参与 MOC。在贫困社区工作的医生(比值比[OR] = 1.105;95%置信区间[CI],1.038-1.176)、美国出生或外国出生的国际医学毕业生(OR = 1.221;95% CI,1.124-1.326;OR = 1.444;95% CI,1.238-1.684)或个体从业者(OR = 1.460;95% CI,1.345-1.585)比来自大型、无差异的认证家庭医生参考组的医生更有可能错过初始 MOC 要求。当年龄保持不变时,女性医生不太可能错过初始 MOC 要求(OR = 0.849;95% CI,0.794-0.908)。研究发现,农村地区的医生在满足初始 MOC 要求方面与城市地区的医生表现相似(OR = 0.966;95% CI,0.919-1.015,无统计学意义)。
大量家庭医生正在参与 MOC。然而,在服务不足地区执业与委员会认证失效之间存在显著关联,这需要更多研究来探讨差异参与的原因。MOC 参与的普及表明,MOC 有可能向医生传达大量与实践相关的医学信息。因此,它提供了一个潜在的渠道,可以提高医疗保健知识和医疗实践。