• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

芬兰前列腺癌筛查试验中的假阳性筛查结果。

False-positive screening results in the Finnish prostate cancer screening trial.

机构信息

Department of Urology, University of Tampere and Tampere University Hospital, Box 2000, Tampere FIN-33521, Finland.

出版信息

Br J Cancer. 2010 Feb 2;102(3):469-74. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605512. Epub 2010 Jan 5.

DOI:10.1038/sj.bjc.6605512
PMID:20051951
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2822946/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is evidence that prostate cancer (PC) screening with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) serum test decreases PC mortality, but screening has adverse effects, such as a high false-positive (FP) rate. We investigated the proportion of FPs in a population-based randomised screening trial in Finland.

METHODS

Finland is the largest centre in the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer. We have completed three screening rounds with a 4-year screening interval (mean follow-up time 9.2 years) using a PSA cutoff level of 4.0 ng ml(-1); in addition, men with PSA 3.0-3.9 and a positive auxiliary test were referred. An FP result was defined as a positive screening result without cancer in biopsy within 1 year from the screening test.

RESULTS

The proportion of FP screening results varied from 3.3 to 12.1% per round. Of the screened men, 12.5% had at least one FP during three rounds. The risk of next-round PC following an FP result was 12.3-19.7 vs 1.4-3.7% following a screen-negative result (depending on the screening round), risk ratio 3.6-9.9. More than half of the men with one FP result had another one at a subsequent screen. Men with an FP result were 1.5 to 2.0 times more likely to not participate in subsequent rounds compared with men with a normal screening result (21.6-29.6 vs 14.0-16.7%).

CONCLUSION

An FP result is a common adverse effect of PC screening and affects at least every eighth man screened repeatedly, even when using a relatively high cutoff level. False-positive men constitute a special group that receives unnecessary interventions but may harbour missed cancers. New strategies are needed for risk stratification in PC screening to minimise the proportion of FP men.

摘要

背景

有证据表明,使用前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)血清检测进行前列腺癌(PC)筛查可降低 PC 死亡率,但筛查有不良反应,如高假阳性(FP)率。我们研究了芬兰一项基于人群的随机筛查试验中的 FP 比例。

方法

芬兰是欧洲前列腺癌筛查随机研究的最大中心。我们已经完成了三轮筛查,筛查间隔为 4 年(平均随访时间为 9.2 年),使用 PSA 截断值为 4.0ng/ml;此外,PSA 为 3.0-3.9 且辅助检测阳性的男性也会被转诊。FP 结果定义为在筛查后 1 年内活检无癌症的阳性筛查结果。

结果

每轮筛查的 FP 筛查结果比例为 3.3%至 12.1%。在接受筛查的男性中,有 12.5%在三轮筛查中至少有一次 FP。在一轮 FP 结果后发生下一轮 PC 的风险为 12.3%-19.7%,而在阴性筛查结果后为 1.4%-3.7%(取决于筛查轮次),风险比为 3.6-9.9。超过一半的单次 FP 结果的男性在随后的筛查中会再次出现 FP 结果。与正常筛查结果的男性相比,FP 结果的男性更有可能不参加随后的轮次,比例为 21.6%-29.6%比 14.0%-16.7%(21.6%-29.6%比 14.0%-16.7%)。

结论

FP 结果是 PC 筛查的常见不良反应,即使使用相对较高的截断值,也会影响至少每 8 个接受重复筛查的男性。FP 男性构成一个特殊的群体,他们接受了不必要的干预,但可能错过了癌症。需要新的策略来对 PC 筛查进行风险分层,以尽量减少 FP 男性的比例。

相似文献

1
False-positive screening results in the Finnish prostate cancer screening trial.芬兰前列腺癌筛查试验中的假阳性筛查结果。
Br J Cancer. 2010 Feb 2;102(3):469-74. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605512. Epub 2010 Jan 5.
2
False-positive screening results in the European randomized study of screening for prostate cancer.欧洲前列腺癌筛查随机研究中的假阳性筛查结果。
Eur J Cancer. 2011 Dec;47(18):2698-705. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2011.06.055. Epub 2011 Jul 23.
3
Histological inflammation and risk of subsequent prostate cancer among men with initially elevated serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) concentration in the Finnish prostate cancer screening trial.在芬兰前列腺癌筛查试验中,最初血清前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)浓度升高的男性中,组织学炎症与随后发生前列腺癌的风险。
BJU Int. 2013 Oct;112(6):735-41. doi: 10.1111/bju.12153. Epub 2013 Jun 7.
4
Specificity of serum prostate-specific antigen determination in the Finnish prostate cancer screening trial.芬兰前列腺癌筛查试验中血清前列腺特异性抗原测定的特异性
Br J Cancer. 2007 Jan 15;96(1):56-60. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603522.
5
The Finnish prostate cancer screening trial: analyses on the screening failures.芬兰前列腺癌筛查试验:筛查失败情况分析
Int J Cancer. 2015 May 15;136(10):2437-43. doi: 10.1002/ijc.29300. Epub 2014 Nov 10.
6
Prostate cancer mortality in the Finnish randomized screening trial.芬兰随机筛选试验中的前列腺癌死亡率。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013 May 15;105(10):719-25. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djt038. Epub 2013 Mar 11.
7
Impact of Prostatic-specific Antigen Threshold and Screening Interval in Prostate Cancer Screening Outcomes: Comparing the Swedish and Finnish European Randomised Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer Centres.前列腺特异性抗原阈值和筛查间隔对前列腺癌筛查结果的影响:比较瑞典和芬兰前列腺癌筛查中心的欧洲随机研究。
Eur Urol Focus. 2019 Mar;5(2):186-191. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2017.07.007. Epub 2017 Aug 10.
8
Number of Screening Rounds and Postscreening Prostate Cancer Incidence: Results from the Finnish Section of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer Study.筛查轮数与前列腺癌筛查后的发病率:芬兰参与的前列腺癌筛查欧洲随机研究的结果。
Eur Urol. 2016 Sep;70(3):499-505. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.05.009. Epub 2016 Jun 11.
9
Positive predictive value of prostate biopsy indicated by prostate-specific-antigen-based prostate cancer screening: trends over time in a European randomized trial*.基于前列腺特异性抗原的前列腺癌筛查指示的前列腺活检的阳性预测值:一项欧洲随机试验的随时间变化趋势*。
BJU Int. 2012 Dec;110(11):1654-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11481.x. Epub 2012 Oct 8.
10
Second round results of the Finnish population-based prostate cancer screening trial.芬兰基于人群的前列腺癌筛查试验第二轮结果。
Clin Cancer Res. 2004 Apr 1;10(7):2231-6. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-03-0338.

引用本文的文献

1
The role of inflammatory processes and zinc levels in prostatic enlargement among Iraqi samples.伊拉克样本中炎症过程和锌水平在前列腺增大中的作用。
J Med Life. 2023 Sep;16(9):1388-1392. doi: 10.25122/jml-2023-0224.
2
Modifiable risk factors for subsequent lethal prostate cancer among men with an initially negative prostate biopsy.可改变的风险因素与初始前列腺活检阴性的男性后续致命性前列腺癌相关。
Br J Cancer. 2023 Dec;129(12):1988-2002. doi: 10.1038/s41416-023-02472-y. Epub 2023 Oct 28.
3
Determination of urinary spermine using controlled dissolution of polysulfide modified gold electrode.采用多硫化物修饰金电极可控溶解法测定尿精脒。
Mikrochim Acta. 2023 Feb 10;190(3):87. doi: 10.1007/s00604-023-05664-8.
4
Early prediction of prostate cancer risk in younger men using polygenic risk scores and electronic health records.利用多基因风险评分和电子健康记录提前预测年轻男性的前列腺癌风险。
Cancer Med. 2023 Jan;12(1):379-386. doi: 10.1002/cam4.4934. Epub 2022 Jun 25.
5
Molecular imaging of orthotopic prostate cancer with nanobubble ultrasound contrast agents targeted to PSMA.纳米气泡超声对比剂靶向 PSMA 对原位前列腺癌的分子成像。
Sci Rep. 2021 Feb 25;11(1):4726. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-84072-5.
6
Can expressed prostatic secretions effect prostate biopsy decision of urologist?前列腺液的表达是否会影响泌尿科医生对前列腺活检的决策?
Int Braz J Urol. 2019 Mar-Apr;45(2):246-252. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2018.0292.
7
Development of Adenosine Deaminase-Specific IgY Antibodies: Diagnostic and Inhibitory Application.腺苷脱氨酶特异性 IgY 抗体的研制:诊断与抑制应用。
Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2018 Apr;184(4):1358-1374. doi: 10.1007/s12010-017-2626-x. Epub 2017 Oct 17.
8
Evaluation of Combined Quantification of PCA3 and AMACR Gene Expression for Molecular Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer in Moroccan Patients by RT-qPCR.通过逆转录定量聚合酶链反应(RT-qPCR)联合定量检测PCA3和AMACR基因表达用于摩洛哥患者前列腺癌分子诊断的评估
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2016 Dec 1;17(12):5229-5235. doi: 10.22034/APJCP.2016.17.12.5229.
9
Immunochemical Assays and Nucleic-Acid Detection Techniques for Clinical Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer.用于前列腺癌临床诊断的免疫化学检测和核酸检测技术
J Cancer. 2016 Feb 10;7(5):523-31. doi: 10.7150/jca.13821. eCollection 2016.
10
Molecular Form Differences Between Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) Standards Create Quantitative Discordances in PSA ELISA Measurements.前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)标准品之间的分子形式差异导致PSA酶联免疫吸附测定中的定量不一致。
Sci Rep. 2016 Feb 25;6:22050. doi: 10.1038/srep22050.

本文引用的文献

1
Prostate cancer diagnosis and treatment after the introduction of prostate-specific antigen screening: 1986-2005.前列腺特异性抗原筛查引入后的前列腺癌诊断与治疗:1986 - 2005年
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009 Oct 7;101(19):1325-9. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djp278. Epub 2009 Aug 31.
2
Cumulative incidence of false-positive results in repeated, multimodal cancer screening.重复多模式癌症筛查中假阳性结果的累积发生率。
Ann Fam Med. 2009 May-Jun;7(3):212-22. doi: 10.1370/afm.942.
3
Screening and prostate-cancer mortality in a randomized European study.一项欧洲随机研究中的筛查与前列腺癌死亡率
N Engl J Med. 2009 Mar 26;360(13):1320-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0810084. Epub 2009 Mar 18.
4
Mortality results from a randomized prostate-cancer screening trial.一项前列腺癌随机筛查试验的死亡率结果。
N Engl J Med. 2009 Mar 26;360(13):1310-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0810696. Epub 2009 Mar 18.
5
Specificity of serum prostate-specific antigen determination in the Finnish prostate cancer screening trial.芬兰前列腺癌筛查试验中血清前列腺特异性抗原测定的特异性
Br J Cancer. 2007 Jan 15;96(1):56-60. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603522.
6
The impact of a suspicious prostate biopsy on patients' psychological, socio-behavioral, and medical care outcomes.可疑前列腺活检对患者心理、社会行为及医疗护理结局的影响。
J Gen Intern Med. 2006 Jul;21(7):715-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00464.x.
7
Long-term effects of finasteride on prostate specific antigen levels: results from the prostate cancer prevention trial.非那雄胺对前列腺特异性抗原水平的长期影响:前列腺癌预防试验的结果
J Urol. 2005 Sep;174(3):877-81. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000169255.64518.fb.
8
Prostate cancer detection in men with a 'normal' total prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level using percentage free PSA: a prospective screening study.使用游离前列腺特异性抗原百分比在总前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)水平“正常”的男性中检测前列腺癌:一项前瞻性筛查研究。
BJU Int. 2005 Jun;95(9):1249-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2005.05514.x.
9
Global cancer statistics, 2002.2002年全球癌症统计数据。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2005 Mar-Apr;55(2):74-108. doi: 10.3322/canjclin.55.2.74.
10
Effects of false-positive prostate cancer screening results on subsequent prostate cancer screening behavior.前列腺癌筛查假阳性结果对后续前列腺癌筛查行为的影响。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2005 Jan;14(1):190-4.